My onc told me she will not do tumor markers because they are not accurate in breast cancer and only cause high anxiety. Also, because I am stage I, OK-really stage II since one of my nodes had atypical cells, she says I won't need them because TCH will be curative. I wish she read this message board. Is it the norm for stage I not to have tumor markers done? Are they helpful? What are the marker tests called? Is it possible she doesn't do them because my cheap axx insurance won't cover them?
| Posts 1 - 15 (15 total) | |
|---|---|
|
pj12345 Joined: May 2009 Posts: 1,770 |
Nov 20, 2009 08:12 am
pj12345 wrote:
I am stage one and my med onc does a CA15-3 test every 3 months. My insurance approved fee is less than $50.00 for the test. She says the number itself is not as important as the trend. But lots of docs do not order them. I like it. pam "Teach me your mood, oh patient stars, who climb each night the ancient sky" TX: Lumpectomy, 36 Radiation, Arimidex
Diagnosis: 3/3/2009, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
kira Joined: May 2008 Posts: 1,023 |
Nov 22, 2009 04:07 pm
kira wrote:
ASCO guidelines are NOT to do tumor markers, except in stage IV disease (American Society of Clinical Oncologists)
Recommendations Different tumor markers are used at different points in the diagnosis and treatment process. The ASCO recommendations for tumor markers for breast cancer include the following: For patients with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): DCIS means that cancer has not spread outside of the ducts in the breast. It is also called noninvasive breast cancer. No tumor marker tests for DCIS are recommended at this time. ER and PR tests, to help predict response to hormone therapy after surgery HER2 test, to help predict response to trastuzumab and other anti-HER2 treatments and some types of chemotherapy For patients with node-negative breast cancer: uPA and PAI-1 tests, if available, to estimate the prognosis. Patients with tumors that do not have uPA and PAI-1 have a very good prognosis and may not need chemotherapy. Oncotype DX test, to identify patients who may be successfully treated with tamoxifen alone and may not need chemotherapy ER and PR tests, to help predict response to hormone therapy HER2 test, to help predict response to trastuzumab and other anti-HER2 treatments CA 15-3 and CA 27.29, for monitoring treatment; these should be used along with the patient's health history, a physical examination, and diagnostic imaging tests, such as an x-ray, computed tomography (CT) scan, and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CEA, for monitoring treatment; this test should be used along with the patient's health history, a physical examination, and diagnostic imaging tests. HER2 test, to help predict response to trastuzumab and other anti-HER2 treatments and guide the use of specific chemotherapy Kira Diagnosis: 5/10/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage Ib, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
ookii Joined: Nov 2009 Posts: 6 |
Nov 29, 2009 07:07 am, edited Nov 29, 2009 07:08 AM
by ookii
ookii wrote:
I think it's a good idea to track a number of tumor markers regularly. They give you a lot of valuable information. But you need to understand them. Cost is also a factor. There's a good article about tumor markers here (scroll down): http://www.lef.org/protocols/prtcl-027.shtml At the moment I'm are mainly tracking CEA, CA 15-3, Ferritin, ALP, BCA 225, TPA, NTx, alpha-1 globulin, and Hyaluronic Acid. Each marker tells a different story. Combinations of markers are far superior to just one or two. Recently I changed therapy and I do some markers weekly before the next therapy, and I can get a good idea about the response I'm getting. It's amazing how much of a response you can get in some markers in such a short time and they do appear accurate. If one waits too long to check, we can get much bigger jumps in the marker, which I feel are more scary. If something isn't working, it takes longer to find out. Which is what happened to me before. When changing anything with our therapy, marker checks beforehand are a good idea, so that we can isolate the effect it has. I think it makes it less of a guessing game. |
|
cookiegal Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 980 |
Nov 30, 2009 10:35 pm
cookiegal wrote:
I had no idea this was used for early stage! Are you guys in the us? |
|
deborye Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 2,564 |
Nov 30, 2009 10:41 pm
deborye wrote:
Is the onco score test results on the path report if one was ordered? I don't seem to see anywhere that the test was performed my onc does not do the CA blood test on early stage BC. I will have to ask her in Feb at my appt. NEVER GIVE UP/NEVER SURRENDER/www.deborye.multiply.com
Diagnosis: 3/23/2007, IDC, <1cm, Stage Ib, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
weety911 Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 455 |
Dec 1, 2009 03:58 am
weety911 wrote:
Well, my onc does do tumor markers for early stage and guess what? Mine are up during chemo! I started at 27 and 29 before surgery & chemo and now they are up to 47.5! I am freaking out, needless to say. I hope they are NOT reliable in my case. Diagnosis: 7/17/2009, IDC, <1cm, Grade 3, 0/1 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2+ |
|
cookiegal Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 980 |
Dec 1, 2009 11:45 am
cookiegal wrote:
I read elsewhere on the board that they spike during chemo, and also they can spike from non-tumor causes. |
|
Sydney6 Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 128 |
Dec 1, 2009 07:14 pm
Sydney6 wrote:
My onc does the CA.29 test every three months. There is no harm in asking if you want them to do it. That's what I did when I wanted the test to see how well I metabolize the Tamoxifen. I didn't think my insurance company would cover it based on what the plan said, but was willing to pay out of pocket because I wanted to know. My onc explained why she doesn't usually do it, but didn't seem to have a problem ordering it when I asked her to. Insurance did wind up paying. Good luck. Sue Diagnosis: 11/20/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
LRM216 Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 785 |
Dec 1, 2009 08:44 pm
LRM216 wrote:
My onc says that they are not always accurate, but she uses them for the "trend" they establish. I had one at the first visit and she said it was "good". I have them every three months. I have finished my last rads tonight, had my last chemo on 9/10/09 and am Stage 1, Grade 3 triple neg. She did blood work last week and they called today saying all was fine and my tumor marker is 11. I was happy, but if I have no cancer in me (which I hope is the case), why wouldn't my tumor marker come back "0"????? I have been put on this frightening journey against my will, but I do not have to travel it alone.
Diagnosis: 2/23/2009, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 3, 0/1 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2- |
|
sbmolee Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 1,078 |
Dec 1, 2009 08:55 pm
sbmolee wrote:
Carcharm - if your onc will not do the tumor marker testing ask your primary doctor. A gal I work with had cancer years ago and no longer sees an onc. She asks her primary and gets tested annually. My onc does the tumor marker - CA27-29 along with a CBC. There is a book called Life after Breast Cancer that discusses various testing alternatives. Weet911 - the book I mentioned above states there are MANY reasons for elevated and fluctuating values, many of the reasons have nothing to do with cancer. Guess what I took from the book is the results can give false negatives and false positives...and in many cases the false positives - mean more tests necessary to determine reason for elevated results. Live life to the fullest - it is not a spectator sport.
Diagnosis: 3/27/2008, DCIS, 2cm, Stage Ia, Grade 3, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
Sydney6 Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 128 |
Dec 2, 2009 10:13 am
Sydney6 wrote:
LRM216 - The first time my onc did the tumor marker test I thought the same thing. Why would it show anything if you no longer have a tumor? I'm going to ask her later this month about that. Sue Diagnosis: 11/20/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
LRM216 Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 785 |
Dec 2, 2009 03:28 pm
LRM216 wrote:
Thanks, Sue. I see mine Dec. 23rd, so I'll ask too (if my chemo brain remembers!). Linda I have been put on this frightening journey against my will, but I do not have to travel it alone.
Diagnosis: 2/23/2009, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 3, 0/1 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2- |
|
elimar Joined: Jul 2009 Posts: 901 |
Dec 2, 2009 03:53 pm
elimar wrote:
kira, Thanks for posting the guidelines. I was curious about the follow-up for Early Stage women. Diagnosis: 6/24/2009, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
weety911 Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 455 |
Dec 3, 2009 01:27 pm
weety911 wrote:
LRM, Even healthy women who have never had breast cancer have a postive response to the CA 27.29 test. That is why numbers up to 38 are considered normal. Your number of 11 is completely normal! It can still mean there is no cancer in your body. Doctors use these tests more to look at the trend of results, rather than for an absolute number. A consistent increase in the numbers is likely to mean something is going on, but even this doesn't happen in all women with recurrences. This is part of the reason why the use of tumor markers is controversial. Many doctors don't use them at all because they can be somewhat unreliable. Diagnosis: 7/17/2009, IDC, <1cm, Grade 3, 0/1 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2+ |
|
LRM216 Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 785 |
Dec 3, 2009 07:20 pm
LRM216 wrote:
Weety - Thanks so much for putting my mine to ease! I am not a dumb woman, but after I got off the phone with the PA who told me all my blood work came back good and my tumor marker was 11, I felt good. Got off the phone and began wondering, geez, maybe it should have been "0". Tried googling, but could not find anything telling me anything concrete. You just did! Thanks, again - and to you - all good wishes. Linda I have been put on this frightening journey against my will, but I do not have to travel it alone.
Diagnosis: 2/23/2009, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 3, 0/1 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2- |
© 2010 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.