Hi. Read this article on the major causes of cancer and found it to be very logical and interesting.
Just wanted to share with you all:-
| Posts 1 - 30 (125 total) | |
|---|---|
|
dlb823 Joined: Aug 2008 Posts: 2,508 |
Oct 10, 2009 12:03 am
dlb823 wrote:
graceths ~ I've just skimmed the article, and while I'm not refuting it, I think it's awfully simplistic. I for one have always been very active and never overweight. I've always eaten a very wholesome, natural diet, and supplemented with high quality nutritional products. I use only natural cleaning products (no chemicals), have never smoked, and drank no more than an occasional glass of wine. I lived in the mountains (Vail, Aspen) for years, so had an abundance of clean air and water -- and I still developed breast cancer. What this article fails to mention, and what I think is far more dangerous are the hormones women are prescribed throughout our lifetime -- from birth control pills to HRT. Oh, and stress. I think those 2 things are mega factors that were totally overlooked in this article. I know when I was first dx'd, I would be in a supermarket and notice terribly unhealthy looking women with shopping carts full of soft drinks and potato chips and mostly packaged foods -- things I never ate -- and I just thought it was so unfair, because they didn't get bc; I did. And for the most part, the women I've met who are also fighting bc are neither overweight nor unhealthy. In fact, many of them are extremely fit. So while I think it's always better to be as healthy as possible, I just don't buy the notion that you can prevent cancer -- especially bc, which is what I know most about -- entirely with lifestyle choices. Maybe diabetes and in some cases heart disease, but not bc. On the other hand, having fought bc now, I believe and hope that some further lifestyle changes I've made will help me prevent a recurrence -- starting with getting the excess hormones out of my body, and including enough serious exercise to have lost 8 lbs. from my already-slim frame. But I feel like what I'm doing now is kind of above and beyond what most people consider a healthy lifestyle, and definitely more hard core than the recommendations in this article. JMHO ... Deanna "The soul would have no rainbow if the eyes had no tears" Native American proverb
Diagnosis: 2/1/2008, 1cm, Stage IIa, Grade 3, 1/16 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
graceths Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 33 |
Oct 10, 2009 10:32 am
graceths wrote:
Hi I do agree with you all. What the article did not mention is the the other factors but the article was researched based on studies done. I think other factors like heredity, and what you mentioned do contribute. But according to chinese belief, the body if very strong and healthy will prevent cancers from being dominant in the body. Being strong and haelthy does not mean phsyical health but internally strong. Just my opinion. |
|
activern Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 334 |
Oct 10, 2009 10:35 am
activern wrote:
I would not even bother. When I was first diagnosed I remember sitting in my doctor's office going over these theatrical statements about risk factors. My risk factor - having boobs and being female........ that is the number one! Vilma Gordon
Diagnosis: 6/24/2009, IBC, Stage IV, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
pitanga Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 689 |
Oct 10, 2009 05:08 pm
pitanga wrote:
I´ve never been overweight either, always exercised, never smoked, eat very little meat, rarely drink, have no family history... Basically I think they are grasping at straws when it comes to those risk factors. In fact I have read that 80% of all breast cancer patients dont have any risk factors. Graceths, I have a question for you. I notice you mostly post with information about ideas for cures. I also notice you don't list a diagnosis on your bio. Do you have breast cancer? I ask because I find it hard sometimes when people try to come up with ideas about what causes breast cancer. Often they are well-intentioned but there is such a tendency to imply we caused our own illness somehow by what we did or didn't do... it gets a little overwhelming. Lisa First dx 1999, age 39, Stage IIA. 2009--Local recurrence and mets.
Diagnosis: 2/5/2009, IDC, <1cm, Stage IV, Grade 2, mets, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
DGHoff Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 382 |
Oct 10, 2009 06:10 pm
DGHoff wrote:
Lifestyle factors do play a huge role, but I definitely think that hormones are the key for many of us. I have never been overweight, have been fit and healthy in every other way my whole life. Maybe I didn't eat quite as many fruits and vegetables as I should have, but I certainly ate far better than almost everyone I know. Yet, I was was the one to get cancer. I agree too, Deanna. I would be at the grocery store and see what people were buying and think... this is all just so unfair. I think you're also on the mark, Deanna, regarding the hormones and stress. I'm pretty sure the major risk factor for me was the 18+ years I was on birth control pills, coupled with lack of vitamin D, too many hormones from dairy products, and some super stressful things that happened in my life just prior to my diagnosis. They say that one episode of stress can flood our body with more hormones than all the hormone laced beef you can swallow. Here's another interesting thing. I read about one oncologist who says that every single woman in his practice who had breast cancer also had root canals. Interesting if there is a possible link. I had a root canal about 5 years prior to my diagnosis.Hmm. It's quite a tangled web of possibilities. You can go crazy thinking about it. DeAnn Diagnosis: 6/14/2007, IDC, 6cm+, Stage IIIa, Grade 3, 7/8 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
activern Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 334 |
Oct 10, 2009 08:04 pm
activern wrote:
DeAnn: I hope that I do not sound condescending but by the age of 25 the majority of the US population has had a root canal. That may not be the best evidence. Your onc can also probably state that women who are sexually active by age 20 will get breast cancer. I can state a million other non-related examples. Sorry. Vilma Gordon
Diagnosis: 6/24/2009, IBC, Stage IV, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
yasminv1 Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 220 |
Oct 10, 2009 08:14 pm
yasminv1 wrote:
I am 31 and weigh 99 pounds. I have always been thin. I have been eating well and have stayed fit since 18. I started exercising regularly and lifting weight after graduating high school. I drink wine occassionally.I have never had a root canal. No family history of breast cancer. I have been super healthy all my life. Basically, according to this article I should never had gotten cancer. But I did. And I don't sit here wondering why. I did take birth control but so did my Mom and sisters. As my doctor told me it was the luck of the draw. So I will continue to eat red meat on occassion, as well as wine, cheese and milk. The way I see it my family eats and drinks the same things and none of them have cancer so it isn't going to stop me from having what they have. Dx 4/8/2009, Bilateral Mastectomy 6/15/09,DCIS 5CM and IDC, 5.5mm and 3mm, Stage Ib, Grade 1, Mucinous Carcinoma 2mm, Stage 1, Grade 1, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2-,TCx4
|
|
pitanga Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 689 |
Oct 11, 2009 09:28 am
pitanga wrote:
I forgot to say I do have one risk factor--not having children. But I know a lot of other women around my age (49) who dont have children, and only one got it. I also know of many women who have children and got it anyway. Some of them card-carrying health nuts. It is just a crap shoot if you ask me. Sure there is something that causes it, but so far medical science has not gotten a grip on what. Until they do, I try to steer clear of pointing the finger at myself or at others. It only makes it worse. Has anyone read "Illness as Metaphor" by Susan Sontag? In the book she analyzes social attitudes about illnesses considered incurable, comparing ideas about cancer today to those about tuberculosis in the 19th century. It was believed that TB patients had brought the disease upon themselves by leading "dissolute" lifestyles. The cure, it was thought, was for patients to straighten up their lifestyles, eat healthy and especially to go to the mountains where the air was clean. But people who did as they were told kept dying anyway, because of course TB was really caused by bacteria. They didnt figure that out until the end of the 1800s, and when they did, lo and behold, lifestyle had nothing to do with it, it was a contagious disease curable with antibiotics. All those theories down the drain... Sontag makes a parallel between the attitudes about TB in the 1800s and the ones that exist today about cancer. So often the onus for having gotten cancer is put on the patient, yet except for lung and cervical cancers, none of the theories about what a person should or should not do in order not to get it hold up very well. She wrote the book while she was doing chemo for breast cancer. She was 35 years old and stage 4 when she was dx'd, with around 30 positive lymph nodes. They gave her six months to live.... she died decades later, in 2004, having lived a full life and writing many books in between. My hero! Lisa First dx 1999, age 39, Stage IIA. 2009--Local recurrence and mets.
Diagnosis: 2/5/2009, IDC, <1cm, Stage IV, Grade 2, mets, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
LJ13-2 Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 149 |
Oct 11, 2009 12:12 pm
LJ13-2 wrote:
Considering that they have found cancer in mummies and fossil, I wouldn't put too much credence into the theory that it is a "modern" disease. |
|
pitanga Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 689 |
Oct 11, 2009 12:31 pm
pitanga wrote:
Didnt know that about mummies! Interesting. About the speculations that modern society causes cancer, I wonder if it might not be, at least partly, that today so many things that used to kill people much younger --smallpox, local infections, the flu, childbirth, etc.--no longer do. Maybe we have more "opportunity" to develop cancer? Also, way back when, cancer must have gone undiagnosed pretty often. I do historical research and I often have to look at death records from the 1800s. The causes of death are often phrased in very ambiguous terms -- "internal malady" "dropsy" [i.e., abdominal swelling] etc. Things that, if they had performed autopsies, could very well have turned out to be cancer. First dx 1999, age 39, Stage IIA. 2009--Local recurrence and mets.
Diagnosis: 2/5/2009, IDC, <1cm, Stage IV, Grade 2, mets, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
activern Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 334 |
Oct 11, 2009 02:01 pm
activern wrote:
So true Pitanga. Our ancestors have died for many "causes unknown" or have died from something else like a heart attack and probably had cancer as another underlying disease since yearly physicals were not done routinely as they are now. Sometimes we criticize modern medicine; however, ppl are living much longer lives also increasing the cost of healthcare [another topic]. How many of us would have been survivors only as recent as 10 years ago? Vilma Gordon
Diagnosis: 6/24/2009, IBC, Stage IV, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
rreynolds1 Joined: May 2009 Posts: 333 |
Oct 11, 2009 02:06 pm
rreynolds1 wrote:
I think putting nutrition, etc as a cause makes people feel that if they do the right things they won't get it. Like saying that someone got lung cancer it's because they smoke when not everyone who gets lung cancer is a smoker. My oncologist told me I was a healthy women with breast cancer. Odd but true. It makes me wonder why some women appear to have all the risk factors and don't get cancer and so many of us had none of the risk factors and get it anyway. Who ever said life was fair? Roseann |
|
DGHoff Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 382 |
Oct 11, 2009 04:44 pm
DGHoff wrote:
No worries, Vilma! I totally get your point, and that is kind of what I was getting at in my post, but didn't do a very good job of it. That there are lots of possibilities and nobody really knows for sure. You could point to things all day long and still not know the answer. Good point, Pitanga. Maybe we are just living a whole lot longer now and we have more opportunities to develop cancer. I guess maybe I like thinking that it boils down to nutrition and lifestyle because that is something I have control over. The whole random crapshoot is the scary part. Ah well. I'm just trying to live a day at a time and be thankful for each day. I do feel better since I changed my dietary and exercise habits, so even if it doesn't prevent cancer, I at least feel better each day. No more seasonal allergies, and I am so very thankful for that! DeAnn Diagnosis: 6/14/2007, IDC, 6cm+, Stage IIIa, Grade 3, 7/8 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
pitanga Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 689 |
Oct 11, 2009 08:53 pm
pitanga wrote:
DeAnn, Feeling like I don´t have control over my health is scary to me too. Before breast cancer I never had any serious health condition. I felt like I was in control. Then breast cancer came. I felt so betrayed by my body. Still feel that way. I also get very scared when I fly, about plane crashes. I know that statistically speaking I should be way more scared to get into a car, but I´m not. And I think that is about the feeling of control. In a car I feel like I am in control, even if the chances of getting into an accident are much higher. In an airplane I have less chance of dying but it is completely out of my hands so it terrifies me. Funny how irrational a person can be. Lisa First dx 1999, age 39, Stage IIA. 2009--Local recurrence and mets.
Diagnosis: 2/5/2009, IDC, <1cm, Stage IV, Grade 2, mets, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
pitanga Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 689 |
Oct 11, 2009 09:24 pm
pitanga wrote:
I think I didnt finish my though process in that post. What I was trying to get at is that because of wanting to stay in control, it is tempting to try to find a way of feeling in control of the disease we are facing, even if it is an illusion. First dx 1999, age 39, Stage IIA. 2009--Local recurrence and mets.
Diagnosis: 2/5/2009, IDC, <1cm, Stage IV, Grade 2, mets, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
activern Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 334 |
Oct 15, 2009 03:38 pm
activern wrote:
@Pitanga: We feel out of control because we depend on so many ppl: doctors; government; employer; community social services - you name it! We have to depend on laws or regulations or benefits etc. This becomes frustrating and makes me feel like wanting to give up the whoe damn thing! Sorry! Vilma Gordon
Diagnosis: 6/24/2009, IBC, Stage IV, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
pitanga Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 689 |
Oct 15, 2009 05:32 pm
pitanga wrote:
Vilma, I dont think I understand what you meant. You gave more reasons why we feel out of control. To me that sounds perfectly in agreement with what I said. But it sounded like you are disagreeing? Or is there something I am not getting? First dx 1999, age 39, Stage IIA. 2009--Local recurrence and mets.
Diagnosis: 2/5/2009, IDC, <1cm, Stage IV, Grade 2, mets, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
activern Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 334 |
Oct 18, 2009 11:06 am
activern wrote:
Sorry Pitanga. Simply put - everyone else is controlling what happens to us. Don't you feel this way? Vilma Gordon
Diagnosis: 6/24/2009, IBC, Stage IV, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
pitanga Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 689 |
Oct 18, 2009 01:59 pm
pitanga wrote:
Absolutely! and try though I might to surrender myself to the idea of changing what I can and accepting the inevitability of the rest, the gray area between the one and the other is the source of a whole lot of angst. First dx 1999, age 39, Stage IIA. 2009--Local recurrence and mets.
Diagnosis: 2/5/2009, IDC, <1cm, Stage IV, Grade 2, mets, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
mumayan Joined: May 2008 Posts: 1,737 |
Oct 18, 2009 02:07 pm
mumayan wrote:
The article has disapeared.I would of like to read it. Diagnosis: 4/23/2008, IDC, 5cm, Stage IIb, 2/15 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
Rosemary44 Joined: May 2004 Posts: 3,887 |
Oct 19, 2009 07:58 am
Rosemary44 wrote:
I'm waiting for the sister study to start showing results. In my mind it's not so much about what we did to get here, it's all about what they're doing that keeps them out of places like this. My sister once mentioned to me that she ate one apple every day at work for 25 years. I was thinking about that recently when I saw some research about apples. My next thought was nah, apples keeping BC away? Anyway my sister has 2 sisters with BC and there she still is, free of this disease at age 74. Just in case, I've been eating an apple a day too. What the heck. |
|
BMac Joined: May 2008 Posts: 564 |
Oct 19, 2009 08:21 am
BMac wrote:
Like many of you I was a healthy eating, non-smoking, rarely drinking, slim person who was at her absolute healthiest when I developed ovarian cancer. Five years later I got breast cancer. Neither cancer was hormone positive. My cause? BRCA1. No point in saying "Why me?". It is what it is. You can be the healthiest person in the world and still get cancer. Barbara
Diagnosis: 10/23/2007, IDC, 2cm, Stage IIIc, Grade 3, 1/13 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2+ |
|
yellowfarmh
Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 882 |
Oct 21, 2009 01:24 am
yellowfarmhouse wrote:
You know, you got me thinking. It seems like perfectly healthy kids get cancer for no apparent reason and we are much older and have been exposed to more things. It was interesting to me that at my 25 th high school reununion, there were 30 girls in my class. Four of us have had breast cancer already. One of us has had 4 types of primary cancer in her body. And another girl has lupus. And that's just the people we know about. I too lived pretty healthy, not overweight etc.... no famly hx although my dad had prostate and my uncle melanoma. My personal theory is farm chemical -- possibly in water? Or maybe birth control pills ( progesterone type that I took for endometriosis), also maybe exposure to chlorine chemicals at work as another gal I worked with got BC at same time as me? Or maybe I was a DES baby-- my OBgyn said I had a misshaped uterus.... or maybe a combo of all of these things. I think it is valuable to me is ask why -- mostly for my daughters' sake.... you are right that the why me doesn't help me much.... just hope that I can help my kids live healthy. Lets all continue to live long and as well as possible, Wendy blessings and love to all my sisters here!
Diagnosis: IDC, 3cm, Stage IIIa, Grade 3, 4/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
allalone Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 51 |
Oct 21, 2009 03:03 am
allalone wrote:
There is research about a 'mouse virus' being involved in BC, so maybe one day there will be a vaccination for it, just like cervical cancer, and hopefully a killer ap will be available for us, too. I loved the post about mummies with cancer -- I believe they had a lot of trouble with mice in ancient Egypt raiding the grain stores. That's why they worshipped cats. |
|
barry Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 395 |
Oct 22, 2009 04:31 am, edited Oct 23, 2009 01:45 AM
by barry
barry wrote:
delete |
|
brewster Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 19 |
Oct 31, 2009 05:02 am
brewster wrote:
>>About the speculations that modern society causes cancer, I wonder if it might not be, at least partly, that today so many things that used to kill people much younger --smallpox, local infections, the flu, childbirth, etc.--no longer do. Maybe we have more "opportunity" to develop cancer?<< Bingo! Whether or not its a "nice" thing to think about, infectious disease has been part of the natural selection process that shaped our gene pool. We evolved for millions of years along with infectious diseases culling out the weak. And by weak, I don't mean inferior human beings, but genetically or physiologically susceptible. Maybe the same genetic traits that made people especially susceptible to infectious disease in childhood (and thus would not survive), also predisposed them to certain chronic illnesses or genetic mutations later in life. Only today, thanks to vaccines, antibiotics, and modern medical care, most are surviving the infectious diseases and thus living long enough to pass those genes on, get the chronic diseases or mutations for cancer. So did cancer rates start to increase after the industrial revolution with its environmental pollution and processed foods? Or did cancer rates increase after modern advents such as the identification of microbes (bacteria) as causing disease (leading to food safety, sanitation, and refridgeration), antibiotics, vaccines, and better medical care? |
|
Fairyfloss Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 31 |
Nov 4, 2009 03:41 am
Fairyfloss wrote:
i completely agree with you. i think its critical to be on the right diet. in china, this is no red meat and no dairy; and no sugar. no alcohol. and see the other posts ive made for the rest. once this very strict diet is in place, then the anti cancer, herbs, supplements, other plant treatments can begin. i do believe the chinese can cure this disease, i have heard anecdotal evidence that was very convincing. the western idea of a 'healthy' diet is often very different from chinese medicine's idea of one. even vegetarians and vegans may not be following the 'healthy diet' they suggest. it is very strict. |
|
thenewme Joined: Jan 2009 Posts: 333 |
Nov 4, 2009 04:57 pm
thenewme wrote:
Fairyfloss, do you have breast cancer? Is this what you base your treatment decisions on - "...anecdotal evidence that was very convincing" ?? Wow. Diagnosis: 11/2008, IDC, 5cm, Stage IIb, Grade 3, 0/9 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2- |
|
CrunchyPood
Joined: Sep 2009 Posts: 482 |
Nov 4, 2009 06:50 pm, edited Nov 4, 2009 06:55 PM
by CrunchyPoodleMama
CrunchyPoodleMama wrote:
The article is gone now but I get the gist. I thought I had no risk factors. NO ONE in my family has ever had cancer. Until a few years ago, I was super-healthy... exercised... have been eating mostly organic since college. I did have one gigantic risk factor though. Not having children... and I've had four miscarriages... which (cruelly) put me at much higher risk of bc. (And guess what, out of my closest girlfriends, TWO of them were diagnosed with breast cancer in their late 30's/early 40's... and they are the two who, besides me, have never been able to have children.) Add to that some serious depression/despair for over a year (due to the miscarriages) and eating crappily for the first time in my life, and I guess I can see why I got it. I don't know if the article mentioned these, but here are other risk factors that affect many otherwise healthy people: - drinking and/or cooking with and/or bathing in tap water (horrible stuff, full of poisonous flouride and chlorine) - using products with parabens (in most cosmetics, shampoo, soap, lotions, etc.) - royally screws with your hormones - getting all the vaccinations our society demands we get - those are chock full of carcinogens now - not sleeping 7-8 hours at night (oh yeah, that's another risk factor... I used to pull a lot of all-nighters then nap during the day... terrible for melatonin levels) - eating microwaved food - spending 8-10+ hours a day indoors, where carcinogenic offgassing occurs (particularly in new offices and homes) - radiation from sitting in front of a computer monitor all day, from airport travel, etc. - wearing synthetic or non-organic natural fiber clothing, sleeping on non-organic sheets (those pesticides in the cotton fields don't magically disappear once fabric is made!) - having multiple sexual partners throughout your life, increasing the risk of undetected viruses that can lead to cancer - stress, anxiety, depression- of course, the hormone thing (I thought that didn't apply to me since I was only on birth control for a few months -- I often blame those few months for all my miscarriages, and who knows, maybe it led to this too) - having a less than optimal immune system for various reasons (traveling a lot, not getting enough sunshine, etc.) - not consuming certain micronutrients such as nitrilosides which offer protection against cancer - consuming meat, dairy, caffeine, alcohol, sugar, synthetic vitamins and medications, processed/packaged foods (chock full of cancer-causing chemicals); too many cooked foods, too much non-organic food; not enough leafy greens, etc. (basically, I agree with Fairyfloss about the Chinese diet... and yes, there is solid evidence to support that hypothesis) I have read that all of us have cancer cells that come and go... but most people's bodies naturally protect against it, so they never know they have it. That theory would explain why cancer was found in ancient bodies. The theory that nitrilosides (found in fruit seeds, bitter almonds, sprouts, and certain other foods that most people don't consume much of) have been deleted from our modern diets, thereby reducing our natural protection against cancer, also makes sense. Diagnosis: 10/24/2009 |
|
swimangel72
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 1,779 |
Nov 4, 2009 07:09 pm
swimangel72 wrote:
I'm convinced my BC was due to exposure to DDT before I even had breasts........DDT was outlawed in the 70's, but in the 60's they sprayed it liberally at the beaches of the North Shore of LI where we played as kids. My mother sprayed it in her flower garden and stored it in the house. Yes, perhaps my post-menopausal weight gain did increase my exposure to the bad estrogen (the kind that is created from fat through the work of the adrenal glands), but my onc told me that the "motor" that drove my cancer's growth was the Her2neu protein...........and until other studies prove me wrong, I'm blaming it on DDT exposure. Now - don't get me started on the PCP's in our environment and the increases in cancer due to that carcinogen! As you can see - I get upset whenever reading articles that make it sound like it's OUR fault we got BC! ![]() 3/3/08 Right-side mastectomy with immediate muscle-sparing free tram; 3/9/08 Developed abdominal MRSA staph infection and hernia;Completed 4 months Navelbine and 1 year Herceptin; Arimidex - 4 more years! Diagnosed at age 53
Diagnosis: 2/5/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage Ib, Grade 1, 0/7 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
© 2010 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.