Skip to content
Forum IndexForum: High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer → Topic: Is Radiation Harmful
« Forum: High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer: Managing high recurrence risk of developing a second breast cancer.

Topic: Is Radiation Harmful

Log in to post a reply
  • Posted on: Jun 28, 2009 10:15 pm
Little River, SC
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3
nja922 wrote:

Need help  in deciding if I can go through w/ radiation.

I have read about alot of side effects (long & short term)

I have DCIS

Posts 1 - 6 (6 total)
baywatcher
Key West, FL
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 351
Jun 28, 2009 10:45 pm baywatcher wrote:

Yes, it is harmful but it wouldn't kill cancer cells if it wasn't.

nja922
Little River, SC
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3
Jun 28, 2009 10:53 pm nja922 wrote:

Hi baywatcher,

I am concerned that it is not necessary for my diagnosis. I have read that DCIS are pre-cancerous

& don't always become invasive. Am I just being silly? The radiation is really scaring me.

baywatcher
Key West, FL
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 351
Jun 28, 2009 11:15 pm baywatcher wrote:

The radiation scared me too. That is one reason that I chose a mastectomy instead of a lumpectomy with rads. I live in Key West so I get a lot of sun and I had already had a mastectomy on my other side. When I had to option of the lumpectomy and rads, the doctors that I discussed my case with stated that without rads there was a 50% chance of the cancer coming back. I don't know if that is correct but it made my decision for me.

You can decide not to do rads. You are allowed to just say no. The problem is that if the cancer came back, would you blame yourself for not having rads?

I didn't have rads but many women say that they are very doable. I was scared because I am in a support group with other cancer patients, not all of them breast cancer. One had rads 20 years ago (older technology I'm sure) and recently has heart issues due to rads. One of the women had rads to the side of her face and now her jaw bone is disinegrating. Scary stuff!

There are just no good solutions to cancer treatment. Wish I could help you but you have to decide this on your own. Lumpectomy with rads is definately protocol.

rgiuff
Long Island, NY
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 303
Jun 29, 2009 10:56 am rgiuff wrote:

NJA922, ask about the probability of getting future cancers if you have the radiation, and the probability without getting radiation, based on your particular case of only having DCIS.   And it also depends on your age.  I've read even about some cases where surgery was all that was recommended for DCIS.  Have you had the surgery already, and if so, what did your pathology report show?

RoseG
Dx 4/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/4 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
pj12345
little bit of Paradise, Fl
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 599
Jul 30, 2009 07:31 pm pj12345 wrote:

Modern radiotherapy has fewer risks than therapy 15 or 20 years ago.  Consult with a radiation oncologist who will be able to explain the new ways of targeting the tumor and exposing the heart and lungs to much less radiation.

Good luck whatever course you take.

Pam 


Dx 3/3/2009, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
MsBliss
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 136
Aug 12, 2009 08:00 pm, edited Aug 12, 2009 08:01 PM by MsBliss MsBliss wrote:
This Post was deleted by MsBliss.

© 2009 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.