Does anyone know how common IDC with multiple invasive tumors is? Only one tumor was detected on my wife's mammogram and sonogram but she had a lumpectomy and another tumor was found so the doctors recommended a mastectomy. The mastectomy turned up 4 more very small tumors.
Thanks,
Randy
| Posts 1 - 14 (14 total) | |
|---|---|
|
prettyinpin
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 2174 |
Jun 15, 2008 02:10 pm
prettyinpink100 wrote:
Randy,
PIP
Dx 2/1/2007, IDC, , Stage IIIb, Grade 2, 9/16 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
fire Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 198 |
Jun 22, 2008 02:44 pm
fire wrote:
Hello, I'm too very interested, how common it is? I had IDC 4sm, IDC 8MM, DCIS, and one tumor in lump node -1sm. I had 2 lumpectomy's because second tumor (8mm) was found after first surgery. Doctor told me that difference between lumpectomy and mastectomy only 2%. Dx 7/3/2006, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 3, 1/12 nodes, ER+/PR+ |
|
BethNY Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 4517 |
Jun 22, 2008 04:11 pm
BethNY wrote:
You can have multifocal tumors with any type- whether it be dcis, idc, or lobular. While it does have a bearing on your surgery, it doesn't really change anything, b/c your treatment will be based on the total pathology. After my mammo which showed one tumor, the ultra sound showed one on top of that- which turned out to be a malignant intramammory lymph node. Of course, we didn't know that till I was opened in the O.R. I don't know if you'll be able to find specifics on that statistic. There are mane women that present with multifocal tumors, which is why many surgeons recommend a bilateral MRI prior to surgery. I told you I only play to win....
|
|
fire Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 198 |
Jun 25, 2008 11:13 pm
fire wrote:
BethNY, thank you. Dx 7/3/2006, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 3, 1/12 nodes, ER+/PR+ |
|
vision4utoo
Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 43 |
Jul 3, 2008 05:59 pm
vision4utoo wrote:
I was wondering the same thing - as I have two tumors, two cancers and multicentric only in one breast though - I haven't seen posts on this topic. Dx 6/6/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage IIa, Grade 2, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
wishiwere Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 3070 |
Sep 1, 2008 04:27 am
wishiwere wrote:
One study from back in 2005 showed about 10% of women were found to have had multi-focal or multi-centric tumors. The study pointed out though, that it may be higher, but with Lumpectomies, one wouldn't know if there were other tumors that weren't seen till a later date. The study also said that they felt in many cases using the entire tumor load would place those women at a higher risk for metasteses and thus, the tx they were receiving was possible undertreatment as a result of using only one foci rather than the aggregate tumor load. That didn't fare well with me in the report and I'm left wondering why more studies aren't done on this aspect of breast cancer. For instance, the oncotype test is done on ONLY the largest tumor, not both, so the ILC w/ LCIS was not even considered in the RS. Seems like that is ommitting pertinent information to me, but no one seems concerned. I still am. Here is what the study concluded: CONCLUSION: The tendency of breast tumors to metastasize is a reflection of the total tumor load. Failure to measure the additional tumor burden provided by multiple small foci may understage a woman's disease. This may deny patients the opportunity of adjuvant therapies if the contribution of the smaller foci to the incidence of node positivity and survival is ignored. wishiwere
Dx 9/21/2007, ILC, 1cm, Stage Ib, Grade 2, 0/4 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
leobear Joined: Jun 2008 Posts: 10 |
Sep 1, 2008 08:15 am
leobear wrote:
wishiwere, thanks for the information. My wife started with a lumpectomy and luckily the surgeon bisected a second tumor so they followed up with a mastectomy and eventually a reexcision on the first mastectomy due to DCIS at the margins in one location. The other breast was clear but because of the multple foci her doctors highly recommend more agressive treatment. Her Oncotype DX was very in the very low end of the gray area and she could have gone either way on chemo, but her oncologist clearly believed more agressive treatment was the right course so she is doing chemo. At least in her case the doctors are taking the multi-focal nature of the cancer into account and treating it more aggressively than would be normal based on the size of the largest tumor. The DX info is for my wife Sandy.
Dx 5/21/2008, ILC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
Emily2008 Joined: May 2008 Posts: 178 |
Sep 1, 2008 08:35 am
Emily2008 wrote:
This is a fascinating conversation. I, too, had a lumpectomy, in which the surgeon bisected another smaller tumor which we didn't even know existed. I was recommended for a re-excision, but opted to have a mast instead. The final path report also showed DCIS. So, I had multiple areas in the breast that were affected, but it didn't seem to concern my surgeon as much as it did me. Perhaps they are used to treating much more aggressive cancers, so when they see a stage 1, grade 1, neg lymphnode cancer, they're happy. I, however, decided to aggressively attack what I had, get the mast, and though my oncotype was 14, 2 oncologists felt that it would be wise to do chemo as well. I'm also pre-menopausal (36 yrs old), so that factored into the decision. That study info is interesting, wishiwere. I've also read that in the recent past, tumor stage was based on the aggregate size of all tumors involved. Nowadays, they only count the largest one. I wonder how this has affected recurrences, distant metastises, and overall survival? Dx 5/14/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/5 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
gsg Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 3348 |
Sep 1, 2008 09:02 am
gsg wrote:
Thanks for the study info, Wish. i found a lump, and mammo and ultrasound showed just the one lump. had an MRI and it showed four other tiny tumors surrounding it. i was still able to have a lumpectomy because they were so close to the large tumor. felt fortunate that there were clear margins of 1 cm or more and no evidence of vascular invasion shown on final path report. Since MRI seems to show more in my breasts, my breast surgeon has me get one annually. I don't regret my decision to have a lumpectomy as opposed to mastectomy. Had chemo, rads and am now on an AI. Pardon me if I repeat myself. Can't remember jack.
|
|
wishiwere Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 3070 |
Sep 1, 2008 09:34 am
wishiwere wrote:
That's what concerns me too, Patrice. I had the 2 in different quadrants with the larger IDC/DCIS at noon high on the chest wall, and the other just about under the nipple and was ILC/LCIS. With the tx and all, they only considered the IDC even though the ILC was over 1cm without the LCIS involvement. Now, they aren't even doing mammo's every 6 months, but annually. The Mammo and the U/S did NOT find this ILC, only on the MRI, so yes, I'm very uncomfortable with this R breast and it's follow up. There just doesn't seem to be enough study or consistency when it comes to the treatment of mult-centric, multi-focal BC and follow either. Makes one wonder who to trust, who to go to and what the heck...everything, you know? No thanks needed guys, this is one of the sites i've saved, b/c it's bothered me ever since I found way back in january. But of course, my onco can't understand me when I ask questions, and doesn't 'normally' deal with BC pts, so what good would it do to bring it up either :( wishiwere
Dx 9/21/2007, ILC, 1cm, Stage Ib, Grade 2, 0/4 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
kimbly Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 255 |
Sep 1, 2008 10:09 am
kimbly wrote:
I also had two tumors and DCIS in a different quadrant in the same breast. The two tumors did show up on the mammo and u/s as did the DCIS. Nothing more was found after surgery, I did have chemo before my surgery though. Dx 11/21/2007, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
wishiwere Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 3070 |
Sep 1, 2008 10:32 am
wishiwere wrote:
So, Kimbly, did you have a mast or lump? I know that they say complete response to the neochemo is a great sign! Sounds excellent hey? wishiwere
Dx 9/21/2007, ILC, 1cm, Stage Ib, Grade 2, 0/4 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
vhqh Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 372 |
Sep 1, 2008 07:56 pm
vhqh wrote:
I had a lumpectomy, margins were not clear but a bone lesion had been found so I started chemo right away. Finally had a mastectomy and they found LCIS, ALH plus many flecks of IDC scattered through the remaining tissue. Path report stated that it showed chemo response so who knows what it looked like before chemo. IDC, er+/pr +, her2 +++, stage IV
|
|
koshka1 Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 228 |
Sep 1, 2008 11:06 pm
koshka1 wrote:
Hi ladies.... I initially had a diagnosis of low grade dcis (found by calcifications on my first mammogram)...after i had the first lumpectomy to remove that..lo and behold they found a 1mm idc and a 4mm idc both low grade and no lymph nodes......i had a second lumpectomy to clear margins...then i did radiation treatment and tamoxifin.... i was lucky both of those were so small.... a client/friend of mine just turned 40 and was just diagnosed with 2 very large tumors in her breast,, she is doing the whole works, chemo, bilat, radiation...and probably hormonals after....she is doing great and remaining very strong, positive and hopeful..... hugs to all of us... kosh Dx 12/2007, IDC, <1cm, Stage Ia, Grade 1, 0/1 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
© 2008 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.