Skip to content
Forum IndexForum: IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma) → Topic: Please explain this decision by Susan Komen Foundation
« Forum: IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma): Just diagnosed, in treatment, or finished treatment for IDC.

Topic: Please explain this decision by Susan Komen Foundation

Log in to post a reply
  • Posted on: Nov 7, 2009 05:00 pm
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 136
MsBliss wrote:

Could someone please explain why the Susan Komen Foundation sponsored a conference which took place this past October in Egypt which was to celebrate unity in conquering breast cancer but allowed the Egyptian Health Minister Gabali to ban any Israeli doctor from attending?

Page 1 of 2 (39 results)

1 2
Posts 1 - 30 (39 total)
CoolBreeze
Sacramento
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 462
Nov 7, 2009 05:10 pm CoolBreeze wrote:

The Komen foundation cannot control what the Egyption government does.  The Egyptions disallowed the Isrealis from attending at the last minute.

Komen put out this statement:

_____

Susan G. Komen for the Cure Pleased to Announce Egyptian Events to Welcome All Advocates, Including those from Israel Statement by Nancy G. Brinker, Founder, Susan G. Komen for the Cure

"Breast cancer advocates from the United States and across the Middle East are meeting in Egypt from October 21-27 for breast cancer awareness events. There have been reports that some of the invited participants would not be allowed to attend these events. Susan G. Komen for the Cure has now received confirmation that all advocates, regardless of their country of origin, are invited to fully participate in events to bring breast cancer to the forefront of public discussion in the Middle East.  

_____

They launched diplomatic activity to try to get the Isrealis back in attendance.  I don't know how successful they were but to say that Koman didn't allow it is disengenouous.  However, putting on a conference that all are welcome to attend in the Middle East was probably naive and hopefully they will chose a better location for future events.

Ann's cancer blog. http://butdoctorihatepink.blogspot.com/
Diagnosis: 8/17/2009, IDC, 4cm, Grade 3, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2+
Leah_S
Israel
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 667
Nov 7, 2009 06:05 pm Leah_S wrote:

The Israeli delegation was barred from participating. Susan G. Komen for the Cure chose to accept this and not cancel the conference.

The Egyptian government appears to hate Jews more than it hates cancer.

Leah


Diagnosis: 11/3/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage IIb, Grade 3, 6/17 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
Leah_S
Israel
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 667
Nov 7, 2009 06:06 pm Leah_S wrote:

Please understand that my comment in the abov post refers, as I stated, to the Egyptian GOVERNMENT and not individuals.

Leah


Diagnosis: 11/3/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage IIb, Grade 3, 6/17 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
MsBliss
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 136
Nov 7, 2009 08:17 pm MsBliss wrote:

I never said, nor did I mean to imply, that this was an act perpetrated by the Komen Foundation.  Of course it was not. In response to your statement, it seems "disengenuous" of you to attribute that to my post.    This was more than naive, it was incredibly irresponsible.  I don't see how the Susan Komen Foundation could have, or should have, continued their association with this conference after this behavior by the Egyptian Health Minister. 

London-Virg…
Great Britain
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 827
Nov 7, 2009 08:21 pm London-Virginia wrote:

MsBliss - what is the point of your post?  We have already had a debate concenring this topic over the last week or more.  The moderators eventually had to intervene.

Virginia.
Diagnosis: 5/9/2009, IDC, 2cm, Stage IIb, Grade 3, 1/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
2tzus
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 303
Nov 7, 2009 10:01 pm 2tzus wrote:

Komen cannot control the Egyptian government. They CAN control WHERE and WHO they allow to host their conference. When their HOST chooses to bar INVITED participants, the Komen Foundation had the choice to make a strong statement and cancel the event. They did neither. One has to wonder why.

It's okay, MsBliss. You don't have to have a POINT to post here, not the least was that you did have a POINT, which was your question about the Komen/Egyptian conference controversy. While there was short discussion about this in another forum recently, no doubt you did not see it there. As far as I know, the moderators have not forbidden discussing this topic and since the Komen Foundation is probably the world's largest fundraiser for breast cancer, it is a relevant topic for a breast cancer discussion board.


Diagnosis: 8/4/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
MsBliss
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 136
Nov 8, 2009 02:25 am MsBliss wrote:

London Virginia,

Why are you asking me this? 

First, I did not see the other thread on this topic--I was surprised to learn this had happened. 

Secondly, since when is a single topic restricted to one thread?  There are multiple layers and multiple hits for dozens and dozens of other topics.  Do you notify other members when they ask a question about another subject that has already been discussed on other threads?

I honestly don't care that the moderators had to intervene.  This is a very disturbing event and the reaction to it should be just as disturbing.

 

barbe1958
Barrie, ON
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,194
Nov 8, 2009 08:39 am barbe1958 wrote:

But why are you asking us? Ask the Susan Komen Foundation! Nothing we say or don't say will ever change anything. You have to go to the source...perhaps the Egyptian government?

Papillary Carcinoma with ITCs and IMLN, Bilateral Mastectomy Dec 16th/08 No re-con. No foobies.
Diagnosis: 12/10/2008, 1cm, Stage II, 2/13 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
kmccraw423
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,508
Nov 8, 2009 08:57 am kmccraw423 wrote:

Right on Barbe ... well said.  I don't know why this happened.  CoolBreeze is probably right about naivity.  I am sure their intentions were good (I know, trhe road to hell is paved with good intentions). I remember years ago, and I don't know if it is still true but I suspect it is (and remember this was well before 9/11 and terrorist strikes) if you wanted to see Egypt and Israel it was best to visit Egypt first before you got an Israeli visa on your passport.

MsBliss - I understand righteous indignation - I love righteous indignation - but I don't think anything will be resolved here.  None of us were in control of any part of the situation.  Anyway, it was a good point but I think Komen is the only one who can answer this with any validity.

Kathleen
Diagnosis: 10/3/2008, DCIS, 4cm, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
MsBliss
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 136
Nov 8, 2009 05:24 pm MsBliss wrote:

Barbe, are you serious?  What do you mean by "us"?  Do you speak for everyone here?  Maybe some of the other forum members would have something enlightening to add to the conversation--this is, after all a DISCUSSION FORUM for and about everything Breast Cancer and Susan Komen is the biggest Breast Cancer Foundation on this earth. 

You are mistaken that anything we say will have no impact on poor decisions by a high profile entity like Komen.  From what I have read since my original topic posting, had Komen CANCELLED the conference, it would have gone a long way toward making a statement.  The public reaction to Komen's mishandling of this entire episode is an education for everyone.

Further, I would think that this discussion wouldn't make you so defensive were it you didn't think some of us have no right to be shaken by what happened.

CoolBreeze
Sacramento
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 462
Nov 8, 2009 05:36 pm CoolBreeze wrote:

MsBliss wrote:

I never said, nor did I mean to imply, that this was an act perpetrated by the Komen Foundation. Of course it was not. In response to your statement, it seems "disengenuous" of you to attribute that to my post.

Okay, but here is exactly what you said:

Could someone please explain why the Susan Komen Foundation sponsored a conference which took place this past October in Egypt which was to celebrate unity in conquering breast cancer but allowed the Egyptian Health Minister Gabali to ban any Israeli doctor from attending? 

You made it sound, by the use of the word "allowed" like the Komen Foundation had the ability to allow any government to do anything.  You didn't say anything in your original post about how you think they should have pulled out.  Had you mentioned a better response, I might have agreed.

Perhaps they should have. As a person with rights of return myself, I think what the Egyptionss did was despicable, although certainly not surprising.

On the other hand, the Komen Foundation is not concerned with Middle East Peace. They are concerned with women with breast cancer.  Who do you think is getting better treatment for breast cancer at the moment?  Israeli women? Or Iranian or Egyption women?  

I'd venture the former is getting the same treatment we are privvy too.  So, if your goal in life is to get ALL women the treatment they need - and you are not a diplomatic agenc - then maybe they felt they could do more good and bring more awareness by going on with the conference.

I'm not saying it's what I would have done but just remembering what they might be concerned with.

Ann's cancer blog. http://butdoctorihatepink.blogspot.com/
Diagnosis: 8/17/2009, IDC, 4cm, Grade 3, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2+
MsBliss
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 136
Nov 8, 2009 07:16 pm MsBliss wrote:

I agree with you.  When I went to MD Anderson, I was astonished at the number of women from Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Iran and the Saudi Arab Emirates there.  Since I speak some limited Farsi, and they spoke a bit of English, I had a conversation with a woman and her daughter.  A long conversation because we waited almost 90 minutes for our appointments.  They cannot get proper treatment and screening in their homeland because of cultural issues--but not so much because of access to the latest treatments. 

But I wonder if cancelling the event would have sent a louder message than the appeasement that was dished out by the Komen Foundation to the limited brains that saw fit to hurt the very women who need this free exchange of information most.

barbe1958
Barrie, ON
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,194
Nov 9, 2009 07:22 am, edited Nov 9, 2009 07:23 AM by barbe1958 barbe1958 wrote:

Bliss, if you met a lot of women from other countries then I think the message is getting out. Women have had breasts and breast cancer for, oh, what do you think? About 10,000 years! Please credit third world countries with some semblance of knowledge! It's the TREATMENT that is of issue. You say they can get diagnosed, but not treated? That doesn't make sense. 

There are millions of women around the world that can't get adequate treatment! Not just "over there". You're standing on quite a big soapbox and trying to ignite a topic that was dealt with weeks ago.

This is not the right venue to try to change the Egyptian government!  What kind of answers are you looking for? You ask us to "explain this decision". We most certainly CANNOT do that. Please call the foundation and let us all know what their explanation is....I'll wait with bated breath....

Papillary Carcinoma with ITCs and IMLN, Bilateral Mastectomy Dec 16th/08 No re-con. No foobies.
Diagnosis: 12/10/2008, 1cm, Stage II, 2/13 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
barbe1958
Barrie, ON
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,194
Nov 9, 2009 07:24 am barbe1958 wrote:

Besides...it's a done deal. Learn which battles you need to fight. You'll exhaust the energy you need to fight your own physical battles.

(Had to get that in before you slammed me against the wall again....)

Papillary Carcinoma with ITCs and IMLN, Bilateral Mastectomy Dec 16th/08 No re-con. No foobies.
Diagnosis: 12/10/2008, 1cm, Stage II, 2/13 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
2tzus
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 303
Nov 9, 2009 11:05 am 2tzus wrote:

The topic was never dealth with "weeks ago". The Komen Foundation has NOT been transparent and in fact, has put out some questionable information regarding their handling in this. This was a KOMEN FOUNDATION event. Not an Egyptian event. In fact the Jerusalem Post has said that the Israeli scientist WERE NOT invited back. Many MANY in the Jewish community are very upset about this and it is very relevant because the Komen Foundation ASKS for money for research, yet allows a government to dictate THEIR conference list. Frankly, alot of people are asking if their was a financial incentive for the Komen Foundation to go along with this outrageous act. Lots of oil money in the middle east. Yes, women in the middle east need access to treatments. I wonder if the Egyptian government would deny a cure or treatment that was discovered by Israeli scientists? From their actions, one would have to surmise that they would. And from Komen's actions, evidently they would be complicit in this denial.

MsBliss did not slam you against the wall, Barbe. You snarked her first. You accuse her of being on a soapbox? Since when are YOU the arbiter of what is relevant or not? This is a breast cancer discussion forum, and the actions of the world's largest breast cancer foundation is very relevant to discussion here. Why don't YOU learn which battles you need to fight instead of telling other people what theirs should be? Don't like this topic? Then don't freaking post in it!


Diagnosis: 8/4/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
barbe1958
Barrie, ON
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,194
Nov 9, 2009 11:24 am barbe1958 wrote:

This topic WAS dealt with and if I'm not mistaken, stopped by the Moderators as it became too political. You're right! This is a breast cancer forum, but not a political forum. Surely you've seen what happens when politics and emotions mix.

I didn't "snark" MsBliss first, I made a comment....a discussion if you will....

By the lack of response from the other ladies on this board, you can see that this is a tired topic, and one that cannot be properly addressed here. Perhaps the Komen Foundation has a discussion board where the politics of this decision can be addressed?

2tzus, by the amount of capitals in your post, I see this is a very emotional topic for you. I am sorry that my post has distressed you. I have seen many topics closed down in the past year when people get overheated on political issues...I certainly don't want to add to the fire. (I come in peace....Innocent)

Papillary Carcinoma with ITCs and IMLN, Bilateral Mastectomy Dec 16th/08 No re-con. No foobies.
Diagnosis: 12/10/2008, 1cm, Stage II, 2/13 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
2tzus
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 303
Nov 9, 2009 11:33 am 2tzus wrote:

Barbe, the moderators did not close any topic down regarding this. It was not stopped. One poster complained (unfairly iun my mind) that there was a solicitation in the original post and the OP altered her post to accomodate that. The topic is not closed down and anyone can go and post in it. Some of us do not feel this is a "political" topic at all. Fundraising for breast cancer isn't/shouldn't be political. It follows that Komen should make sure it is never perceived as such. That is the argument.

I don't think it's a tired topic at all. In fact, I KNOW there are other ladies that MIGHT want to discuss it except for those poster here that appoint themselves the Post Police and make it their business to insert themselves into threads just to waggle their fingers about whether the topics or posts are "appropriate". I think of these finger wagglers as Busy Bodys. Other people call them Bullies. Whatever..when I read a topic that I don't have anything to add to, I simply back out of it. How hard can that be for you?


Diagnosis: 8/4/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
Member_of_t…
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,555
Nov 9, 2009 11:34 am Member_of_the_Club wrote:

Komen should have cancelled.  Period.  I think its great for Komen to reach out to Arab women, who I'm sure are underserved, but not in the face of bigotry.  I never saw the earlier thread so I didn't know about this issue, but in my opinion Komen took the cowardly way out.


Diagnosis: 9/30/2004, IDC, 3cm, Stage IIb, Grade 2, 1/17 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
PatMom
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 664
Nov 9, 2009 11:40 am PatMom wrote:

Ladies, money talks.  Is there another organization that is doing the kind of research we need and working to come up with a cure?  If we direct donations there that otherwise would have gone to Komen, and let Komen know why I guarantee that they will get the message, and won't be planning anymore international conferences in locations where the government is likely to prohibit some of the invitees from attending.

If we send an email to Komen letting them know that "I won't be participating in _____________ event this year, and instead will be donating the $_________ to ____________________ in protest of over your organization's handling of the barring of Israeli participants in the Egyptian Conference in October 2009."   It will be far more effective than bickering among ourselves.

Until the time when someone comes up with a definitive "cure", we each have to cobble together what we believe will be the most effective treatment that we can live with, not merely survive.
BinVA
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,690
Nov 9, 2009 11:46 am BinVA wrote:

Great idea Patmom.   I think I would donate to The Huntsman Foundation instead.

barbe1958
Barrie, ON
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,194
Nov 9, 2009 11:50 am barbe1958 wrote:

2tzus, sorry, but the original posting was "Egyt Bans Israeli Scientists from Komen Breast Cancer Conf." The moderators DID get involved and I saw you  post there as well (so whew I'm not crazy!). I see the post was modified to exclude what I, too, considered prejudicial wording. Religion should NEVER come between humans and it is so sad that it does. Peel away our skin and we are all the same inside.

Great point PatMom! 

Papillary Carcinoma with ITCs and IMLN, Bilateral Mastectomy Dec 16th/08 No re-con. No foobies.
Diagnosis: 12/10/2008, 1cm, Stage II, 2/13 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
2tzus
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 303
Nov 9, 2009 11:57 am 2tzus wrote:

I did not say the moderators did not get involved, Barbe. I said that they did not close the topic or shut it down as YOU stated they did. I did post in that topic for the same reason I posted in this one. Because it is a timely and relevant subject to women with breast cancer regardless of ethnicity, religion, skin color. That thread got sidetracked by a different issue.

And as you can see, evidently this is NOT a tired topic. And I see no reason for women to go elsewhere to discuss it as you have suggested.


Diagnosis: 8/4/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
barbe1958
Barrie, ON
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,194
Nov 9, 2009 12:10 pm barbe1958 wrote:

I only suggested that maybe it would be MORE effective discussed on the Komen website rather than here....SORRY if I was NOT on the same PAGE as you. Oh my God! I made a BOO-BOO! The other topic wasn't closed down...yikes! But YOU were the ONE that said it was "never dealt with weeks ago" and yet YOU posted THERE! Surprised

Papillary Carcinoma with ITCs and IMLN, Bilateral Mastectomy Dec 16th/08 No re-con. No foobies.
Diagnosis: 12/10/2008, 1cm, Stage II, 2/13 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
2tzus
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 303
Nov 9, 2009 12:32 pm, edited Nov 9, 2009 12:45 PM by 2tzus 2tzus wrote:

But YOU were the ONE that said it was "never dealt with weeks ago" and yet YOU posted THERE!

<deep breath here> Barbe, I was referring to the Komen Foundation. The topic was never dealt with by the KOMEN FOUNDATION. I said that in reference to YOUR comment (above) that "the topic was dealt with weeks ago"). They issued a vague statement and then changed it to an even more vague statement. They have not dealt with this controversy and it is obvious they are hoping it goes away.

YES! I posted in the other forum regarding this topic. I have never said I didn't. I am the one that told you that the moderators did not shut the topic down. I did not come into this topic waggling my finger at the original poster and suggesting she go to another board to discuss this topic. YOU DID. It's fine to have a different opinion than another person. Just say so and leave it at that. It's another thing to appoint yourself the Neener Nanny just to pop in and tell someone what topics are appropriate and which "battles" are worth fighting. And that's what you did.

I am so sick of the Post Police. You can have the last word on this.


Diagnosis: 8/4/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
barbe1958
Barrie, ON
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,194
Nov 9, 2009 12:51 pm barbe1958 wrote:

I get the last word? Goody!

When I said the topic has been dealt with, I meant on this board. If you misinterpreted it, I can't account for that!

I am not a Neener Nanny, whatever that means, I was suggesting posting to a more appropriate forum to GET AN ANSWER! I didn't come here wagging my finger either! I was just wondering what and how the poster could expect to get an answer! Duh.

Papillary Carcinoma with ITCs and IMLN, Bilateral Mastectomy Dec 16th/08 No re-con. No foobies.
Diagnosis: 12/10/2008, 1cm, Stage II, 2/13 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
MsBliss
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 136
Nov 9, 2009 04:41 pm MsBliss wrote:

Barbe, either I'm not writing clearly enough or you are misreading the other posts as well as my own.  I would favor the latter because your responses do not favor discussion, and this is after all, a discussion forum.  I would attribute your misreading of the posts as the reaction of someone who has a hidden agenda and would like to become the "Sheriff of all Postings".  But we don't need another Sheriff.  I am troubled by what happened, I am a member of this forum in good standing, and your sarcasm is neither helpful nor clever.

Now, let me restate, from a lower "soap box" in a "non-slamming" way that I did not write anything about the ability of third world countries to service the medical needs of their people.  Do  you think Syria, Jordan, Egypt, and Iran are "Third World countries"?  If you do, then your bias and judgement of the issues is showing.  Nor did I write that people "over there" had access to treatment but not diagnosis; I did not write anything even resembling anything to which you retorted.  

Actually, nothing in your post is making sense to me.  "Message getting out" about what?  That women get cancer?  That is not a message--it is an inevitable fact.  No one is disputing that.

The women who I met had ample resources and were traveling to MD Anderson for treatment.  They were telling me that there is a problem with screening at home because male doctors cannot "look upon women's bodies" and screening becomes problematic since there are fewer women doctors now than before. They and other of their peer groups travel here to pay cash for treatment; their sisters who have no resources are diagnosed at much later stages and have difficulty getting targeted therapies.  No one is taking any credit away from their medical systems, but if there were no room for improvement then what was the Susan Komen conference for anyway?

I am grateful for everything Komen has succeeded in doing.  More than that, they are extraordinarily powerful now.  There is no room for the nonsense the Egyptian Health Minister pulled.  Komen, being non government affiliated, was perhaps the ONLY ONE that could have made a statement at that opportune moment, yet they chose not to. 

As I said before, I am shocked by this.  I think it deserves a loud response. To insist that this is a dead topic, that there is nothing we can do, is simply your opinion, but not mine.  I have given a lot to Komen--but this year, and only this year, I will send a message that my support goes elsewhere for now.

SoCalLisa
San Diego, CA
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,146
Nov 9, 2009 05:52 pm SoCalLisa wrote:

Why not just have the conference here in the US at Komen headquarters..

DX 2000-IDC- 2B..POS NODE--ER+. PR+, HER2 NEG
barbe1958
Barrie, ON
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,194
Nov 9, 2009 06:29 pm barbe1958 wrote:

MsBliss, hon, you continue to read an agenda in my posts. I've had over 5,000 posts and never have had a problem like this! I most certainly do NOT want to be the "Sheriff of Posting", I am dealing with the reality of my diagnosis and don't have time for petty back and forth like this, but you've rubbed me the wrong way right from the beginning asssuming I'm biased and have this great secret agenda. Please refrain from more name calling and take a deep breath. I said above that I come in peace. If you don't understand what that means, look it up in Wikipedia! Not everyone that words things different that you has an ulterior motive to rule the world.

Papillary Carcinoma with ITCs and IMLN, Bilateral Mastectomy Dec 16th/08 No re-con. No foobies.
Diagnosis: 12/10/2008, 1cm, Stage II, 2/13 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-
MsBliss
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 136
Nov 9, 2009 07:32 pm MsBliss wrote:

Barbe, "HON", if you "come in peace", then please refrain from posting dictatorial mandates; if you don't have time for "petty back and forth like this", than don't post without thinking.

You did have an agenda; generally there is nothing wrong with that.  But you chose to insert yourself into a discussion for the sole purpose of slamming the discussion down, and you chose to do it in a rude and insulting manner.  Well, I usually turn my back on such behavior, but you, Barbe, "HON", rubbed me the wrong way, determined that this discussion did not deserve to see any further oxygen. I don't think you realize how all of your comments on this thread are immature, finger pointing sand box behavior.  That is so unhelpful.  Go to Komen, Go to Egypt, YOU did this, YOU did that.  What do you think this forum is about? 

I will not expend one more atom of energy on you.  That is sad because we have more in common than not.  We have breast cancer and the rule of the day is to hang together, support one another, share information and vent if we need to.  I was astonished when I learned of the Komen event.  You jumped in assuming I was stirring things up in your town and I better not do that. 

All I wanted to do was find out if other's knew about the event, and if it was resolved.

barbe1958
Barrie, ON
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,194
Nov 10, 2009 07:09 am barbe1958 wrote:

MsBliss, I usually call people "HON" just before I call them something worse. Now who's being sarcastic! As you can see, this thread is NOT important to a lot of women except you and me and one other! Aren't you proud?

Many knew of this event as it WAS posted back at the end of October! We've had this discussion. It's done. Why are you trying to rustle things up again?

You, my dear duck, have to look up words in a dictionary! I did not post "dictatorial mandates", but a helpful one! Read back, if you can, and think like an adult, not with the sandbox mentally that you are continually displaying ont this thread. Look up the words you are using and see just how VERY, very wrong you are about me!

Hidden agenda! Give me a break!

Oooooh, this is SO much fun! Laughing

Papillary Carcinoma with ITCs and IMLN, Bilateral Mastectomy Dec 16th/08 No re-con. No foobies.
Diagnosis: 12/10/2008, 1cm, Stage II, 2/13 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-

Page 1 of 2 (39 results)

1 2

© 2009 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.