Member Since: May 24, 2007
Last Login: September 23, 2008
Location:
Occupation:
| Diagnosis: | Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
| Diagnosed: | January, 2007 |
| Type: | Invasive or Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma |
| Recurrent? | No recurrence |
| Metastatic? | No |
| Stage: | Stage II |
| Lymph Nodes Removed: | 9 |
| Positive Lymph Nodes: | 0 |
| Tumor Size: | 4cm-4.9cm |
| Tumor Grade: | Grade 2 or medium grade |
| Hormone Receptor Status: | Tumor has both estrogen and progesterone receptors |
| HER2/neu Status: | Tumor has an excess of HER2/neu receptors or genes |
Posted in:
Recovery, Renewal, & Hope + Moving Beyond Cancer, Created: Sep 4, 2008 01:10 pm
rejected from weight loss study because of breast cancer historyJust wanted to let all those interested know that I got a thoughtful response from the pricipal investigator of the clinical trial. He sent me an e-mail of apology, and said he would look into the matter more and get back in touch. He called today. He said he fully agreed with me that this had been very inappropriately handled on his end. He has addressed this with the person who had coordinated the enrollment of subjects. Re participation in the study, he said the study was without a medical director originally and now has one. It was subsequently decided that a history of cancer within five years would disqualify a subject. The protocol will be revised to reflect this. The reason for the cancer exclusion is that 1) there is the risk of recurrance which might mean such a subject could not complete the trial and 2) clinically, a significant weight loss could be a symptom of recurrance and how would they differentiate between weight loss as a result of the trial and weight loss due to a recurrance? He advised me to work with my doctors on monitoring my weight loss just to be aware of this concern. Anyhow, he did offer me the opportunity to choose either wing of the program, and while I could not be part of the trial, he would assign a grad student to monitor me weekly through whichever wing of the trial I would choose. I thought that was a gracious offer and told him so, but I have decided to do Weight Watchers locally. I figure without being in the actual clinical trial I would not have any particular commitment to the program so might as well do something local. In any event, I do think changes were made as a response to my experience. Thanks for the interest and feedback. Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Recovery, Renewal, & Hope + Moving Beyond Cancer, Created: Aug 22, 2008 07:55 am
rejected from weight loss study because of breast cancer historyThanks, all, for the additional responses. I will work on my letter today. Once that is dealt with, I will do some thinking about how to handle the weight loss issue -- want to do this slowly but surely!
Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Recovery, Renewal, & Hope + Moving Beyond Cancer, Created: Aug 20, 2008 05:54 pm
rejected from weight loss study because of breast cancer historyAnn, I just responded to your PM. ALL, I do feel a bit guilty venting about this when I realize how fortunate I am to have this be an issue. If my primary doc had not found my lump back in 1/07, I would likely be dealing with much more stressful issues than rejection from a weight loss trial. To some extent, I feel like a spoiled brat to be whining about this considering other issues I might have had -- or might have in the future. In general, I am full of gratitude for my second gift of life. But now I want to focus on making the most of it, and losing weight is part of that agenda for me -- so I can make the most of my saved life! Thanks, ALL, for reading and for letting me vent, and for the feedback. I am feeling better already. Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Recovery, Renewal, & Hope + Moving Beyond Cancer, Created: Aug 20, 2008 04:47 pm
rejected from weight loss study because of breast cancer historyThanks, Ann, your comments are very helpful. Sending a strong letter is what I am considering doing. I wanted other reactions/feedback before doing so. This study is through the University of Pennsylvania. Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Recovery, Renewal, & Hope + Moving Beyond Cancer, Created: Aug 20, 2008 04:41 pm
rejected from weight loss study because of breast cancer historyBoth my oncologist and my primary doc have stressed with me how important it is for me to now focus on losing weight. This study did not involve any medications -- just one of two healthy diets and behaviour management with a focus on controlling eating and doing exercise. I really feel it would have been "the answer" for me at this point. It is a NIH federally funded study through a top medical center. I have tried Weight Watchers in the past and it has worked for me when I stuck with it. But with WW I am only responsible to myself. With a study I knew I would feel a commitment to the reserachers and giving good data to medical science to benefit others. The two-year commitment would, I felt, keep me "on the wagon." I may try WW again but it feels same old, same old to me and this study opportunity had me psyched. Thanks for the responses. I needed to vent. I wonder if they thought I was a "bad risk" because I might recur. I can understand that but feel the process was mishandled. Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Recovery, Renewal, & Hope + Moving Beyond Cancer, Created: Aug 20, 2008 04:30 pm
rejected from weight loss study because of breast cancer historyI need to vent. I am over a year past treatment (mastectomy and chemo) and now just on femara for four more years. I am feeling very grateful and ready to take on my "second gift of life" full force. One remaining issue that I have struggled with for a long time is weight. I heard on NPR about a clinical study being done by a major research university in my region. They were soliciting volunteer subjects for this study, which would compare two diets. You needed to be overweight and diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes. (Hey, I met the criteria!) I contacted the coordinator by e-mail, provided my height and weight, and mentioned that I had been successfully treated for breast cancer in 2007, and had had chemo treatments. She wrote back that I seemed to fit the criteria for the study, explained more about it and asked me to call her if I were interested. I made the call, and again mentioned that I had been treated for breast cancer and did NOT want to waste any time if that would be an issue. She said she would double-check with the nurse practitioner, who needed to review my medications, but it should not be an issue. I asked her to let me know immediately if she got a "NO" from the nurse practitioner -- that I would not want to waste time pursing this if I would not be in the study, Again, this coordinator told me she saw no problem and to assume I would be in the study. She sent me paperwork for my primary doc to complete. Because she wanted it returned promptly, I ran it over to my doc's office with a cover letter and request that she turn it around quickly. I also offered to pay any fee in connection with the paperwork, as it was many pages of responses from my doc. I picked up the paperwork a few days later and paid a $25 paperwork fee (fine by me, as I appreciate that doctors do need to be compensated for things like this). Primary doc completed all the papers and said "no contraindications to participating in the study." Meanwhile, I got myself very pscyhed about being in this study, which would combine behavior management sessions with one of two diets being tested. The study would run for two years (one with lots of sessions and the second year mainly a follow-up). I knew it would be a major commitment but felt that I would take the commitment to the trial seriously and thus be highly likely to stick with the program/study, as opposed to doing it on my own or with Weight Watchers. I also had mounds of paperwork to complete myself -- data on weight of family members, detailed medical and lifetime weght data, an essay on my motivation, LOTS of personal info, a depression questionnaire, MANY detailed questions on lifestyle, eating and exercise habits, psychological questions, etc. This took me many hours to complete. I was asked to come to the medical center (in a city in my region) for a 1 1/2 hour initial appointment which also involved a 45-minute drive one-way) and search for and cost of parking. The study does not reimburse for expenses. I set aside a day for doing this. With all my and my doctor's sompleted paperwork, I met with the study coordinator who took my papers to review and left me to read the official authorization paperwork. She first weighed and measured me. Within a minute or two she returned and told me that while she knew I had told her I had had breast cancer, she had just learned from the nurse practitioner that that disqualified me from the study. I broke into tears of frustration. I had raised this issue several times during the initial screening purely to avoid it coming to this point! The coordinator told me that the nurse practitioner had been on vacation when we had first spoken and written weeks ago, and only now had this been discussed. IMO this should have been discussed well before I took this trip into the city. If the NP was on vacation when I asked the question, the coordinator either should have gone higher up to the study managers/directors to get a response, OR should have run this past the NP once she was back from vacation -- not waited until I was sitting in the office with all paperwork done and paid for and my car in a paid spot with gas used for the trip. NOT to mention my time on a beautiful day, and my psychological investment and consequent letdown - the biggest issue for me. The coordinator made a point of telling me that she took "full responsibility" for the mistake, (reminds me of John Edwards LOL) and also that this was "not a case of cancer discrimination." I am frustrated and disappointed at how this was handled. Reactions?? Suggestions?? THANKS! Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + HER2/neu Positive Breast Cancer, Created: Aug 16, 2008 08:26 am
I was so relieved but now...HER2+ and scared againYou should easily be able to take a trip once the chemo is over and you are just on herceptin. Herceptin is relatively easy and most of the time given on a three-week cycle. It is nothing like chemo in terms of side effects. (And thanks to the newer anti-nausea drugs chemo was not bad for me either - ask your oncologist to prescribe Emend for you and take it as directed - really worked for me.) Spring is supposed to be the best time to visit Italy. I think you will be fine once you get going. Best wishes, Joan Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + HER2/neu Positive Breast Cancer, Created: Aug 15, 2008 10:40 am
I was so relieved but now...HER2+ and scared againI very much hope I did not scare you with my mention of heart damage. I just believe in full disclosure, but meant to stress that my case is unusual and far from par for the course. My point was that we HER-2 + ladies are so fortunate to have herceptin available. But I feel dishonest saying that without disclosing that I could not get the full treatment. I am still well within normal ranges for heart function, and am in the VERY small percent of those who had heart damage. Plus, heart disease runs in my family (dad died at 63 of a heart attack). So PLEASE do not stress out. My bet is that you will do fine. I am now as happy as I have ever been in my life (in part because I truly know how fortunate I am) and wish the same for you. You will get through this and do lots more great trips. Why not plan one now to celebrate the end of your treatment? Jyber/Joan Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + HER2/neu Positive Breast Cancer, Created: Aug 15, 2008 07:57 am
I was so relieved but now...HER2+ and scared againIt will get better for you. The hardest times are at the beginning, and you are most of the way through the beginning. Soon you will be in the middle and then you will be on your way through. Her2+ is more aggressive but we are blessed to have herceptin, the "magic bullet." I had a tumor of over 4 cm. as well, but like you was delighted to have no nodes positive. That was like a gift to me. Unfortunately, I am one of the very few who had heart damage from herceptin. My oncologist was strict about this and stopped herceptin when my LVEF remained at 55% (from an earlier 65-70%) even after a herceptin pause. She did not want to cause any further damage. But YOU are very unlikely to have this happen so will probably get the full benefit of herceptin. Even I hope I got enough of it to do the job. I am now feeling great and VERY thankful -- feel as if I was given my life back. Not a bad trade for a "bad boob." Best wishes. Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + Stage III Cancer, Created: Aug 9, 2008 03:02 pm
Okay, this is weird...stage IIIC???Thanks for your response, BMac. Boy, do I understand where you are coming from re feeling "lucky." When I was first diagnosed I was told my tumor was big and aggressive and that my prognosis was uncertain. I also felt guilty as I had neglected my mammos for years. Now I feel like I have been given a second chance at life and am deeply grateful every day. Again, best wishes, Joan Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + Stage III Cancer, Created: Aug 9, 2008 02:21 pm
Okay, this is weird...stage IIIC???Thank you for explaining about your stage, BMac. I was not one who PM'ed you but must admit I was curious as well -- not doubting, just curious as I want to understand as much as I can about this business. Please do not take it as a challenge if others are wondering about your staging; I doubt that they are doubting you; they just want to understand all the factors that go into staging. I don't know if you might want to consider editing your profile to spell it out -- of course, up to you! In any event, the most important and wonderful thing is that you are doing so well! Congratulations and best wishes! Joan Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + HER2/neu Positive Breast Cancer, Created: Aug 7, 2008 02:00 pm
What percentage do they use to stop the herceptin?Snowyday, if I were you I would go in assuming I would NOT be in the small percentage of those treated with herceptin who develop heart issues. Even I, who did have to stop herceptin because of heart damage, am still with an ejection fraction within the normal range (55%). I actually begged my oncologist to continue with the herceptin, because as I told her, "I am more worried about breast cancer than heart disease." I figured let's use all weapons on the BC; I can deal with other issues later. Now I do appreciate how she handled it. Still, I would assume, unless you get other evidence, that herceptin will not be a problem for you. It is not for the vast majority of patients, who benefit greatly from its power over HER-2 + breast cancer. Best wishes to you. Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + HER2/neu Positive Breast Cancer, Created: Aug 7, 2008 07:32 am
What percentage do they use to stop the herceptin?My oncologist stopped herceptin when I went from 65% down 60% and then to 55% and did not recover after several "challenges" and a pause in the herceptin treatments. She said that a 10% drop is enough to demonstrate heart damage and that it was clear that herceptin was damaging my heart. Many other doctors use the 50% (low end of normal function) guideline, but mine insisted on using the drop from original function. She said that the issue of long-term heart damage is a rising concern among those who treat cancer patients. ("We may have cured the cancer but we have given you a heart condition.") Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + Recurrence and Metastatic Disease, Created: Jul 3, 2008 09:14 am
Frustrated to tears!!ARRRGGHH! I am so sorry to read this - you have both psychological (frustration over the PET scan delay) and physical pain. Please allow everyone with you on this trip to cater to you. It can be their gift to you -- as well as your gift to them. I hope you are feeling better in both areas before too long. Jyber/Joan Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + Triple Negative, Created: Jul 2, 2008 04:06 pm
Mastecomy Before or After Chemo?I had the surgery first (mastectomy). I had a large tumor (4.2 cm.) and was fine with the mastectomy - had little interest in saving the breast versus first shrinking the tumor and then possibly a lumpectomy. What I most wanted was as much info as possible re staging upfront. Had I had the chemo first, I would not have known if the cancer might have spread to my lymph nodes already, but been evicted by the chemo. (The chemo might have knocked it out.) So I had the mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy and got the unexpected good news that I was node negative. At least this is my understanding of what the tradeoff was for me. Your tumor is so much smaller than mine was so you are much less likely to have either a mastectomy or lymph node involvement. Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + Stage III Cancer, Created: Jun 30, 2008 11:30 am
not good you guysJanis, What a bummer -- but what a trooper you are! Hoping you can sock it to those bad guys, knock them out and resume eating those sandwiches for a REALLY long time. Thanks for keeping us posted. Joan Dx 1/2007, IDC, 4cm, Stage II, Grade 2, 0/9 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + Stage III Cancer, Created: Jun 24, 2008 03:42 pm
not good you guysJanis, I hope things went OK today. Your attitude is a wonder. Thinking of you and your family. Jyber/Joan (an infrequent poster but one very touched by your story) |
Posted in:
Tests, Treatments & Side Effects + Breast Prostheses and Reconstruction Alternatives, Created: May 14, 2008 06:06 pm
Doc says prostheses won't fit properly--is she right?I had a single mastectomy and use a prosthesis that is inserted into a pocket of a mastectomy bra. I have had no trouble with it at all. Nobody who did not know I had a mastectomy would guess. I am curious about the "push" by surgeons for reconstruction. I told my breast surgeon that I knew I did not want reconstruction. He wanted me to meet with a plastic surgeon anyway. I simply never made the appointment. Before the surgery, I told him again I was confident I would never want reconstruction and if anything I might later want a preventive mastectomy on the other side. He told me he was doing a skin-sparing mastectomy anyway in case I changed my mind. All I cared about was being cured. Plus, I spoke with someone who did have reconstruction and years later it needed redoing when her other breast aged and changed. So she needed more surgery so they could match again. Getting a new prosthesis is much easier in my opinion! I am all for keeping things simple. But in any event, different strokes for different folks! |
Posted in:
Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis + Stage III Cancer, Created: Feb 28, 2008 07:39 pm
Spot on my lung...........I'm another one who had a 3 mm spot (nodule) on my lung show up on my CAT scan post diagnosis is BC. My oncologist said it was so small some radiologists would not even have mentioned it and it would be followed in a year. It is now one year later and my follow-up CAT showed the lung nodule to be the same size. Lack of growth suggests it is not cancer. The oncologist said we will do one more CAT a year from now and if it still has not grown, then it is assumed benign and we will no longer even do any more follow-ups. So I would assume benign unless you see evidence otherwise (such as growth). Apparently many people are walking around with such things blissfully ignorant - we only learn of ours because of the scans we get. |
Posted in:
Tests, Treatments & Side Effects + Breast Prostheses and Reconstruction Alternatives, Created: Jan 24, 2008 06:37 am
? on prostheses-how inconvienentI had a single and have never been tempted to have reconstruction. I prefer keeping things simple. I am one year out. I use a prosthesis when I go out but am often lopsided at home. My only issue is that my prosthesis is somewhat heavier than I expected. It is fine once on. It goes in a pocket in the mastectomy bra. No problem with slippage. |
© 2008 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.