| Posts 1 - 30 (938 total) | |
|---|---|
|
lminior Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 433 |
Apr 11, 2005 06:33 pm
lminior wrote:
Hello Joyce Anne,
I am 37 and was just diagnosed on 3/15/05. At this point I am looking at 24 weeks of Chemo. to begin next week. So, if all goes well, I will be 37 at the end of treatment as well. Oh, and I found the lump myself during a BSE, and before I knew it, was scheduled for my baseline mammo. What a baseline! My first mammo led to a primary cancer! Lori |
|
Roxiesmom Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 692 |
Apr 11, 2005 06:36 pm Roxiesmom wrote: 2 months after my 47th birthday. I'm now 49 1/2. Docs said I had mine 5-8 years b4 diagnosis. yet it never showed on any mamograms. Susan |
|
3boysmom Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 39 |
Apr 11, 2005 06:38 pm
3boysmom wrote:
I was 50 years old when officially diagnosed. Went undiagnosed for at least 1 year. BE VIGILANT. If you think something is wrong, pursue it on your own. You can't always rely on your doctor. Joanne |
|
RDLD Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 177 |
Apr 11, 2005 06:40 pm RDLD wrote: I was 46 when diagnosed and after treatment will be 47. I think I had my breast cancer about 6 months. It was not on the mammogram in July of 2004. Makes me really wonder how long I have had it. I have had mammograms every year since age 40 and had a baseline at 35. |
|
WendiLou Joined: May 2003 Posts: 510 |
Apr 11, 2005 06:51 pm
WendiLou wrote:
1 week after my 34th birthday I am 2 years out now and doing great! Wendy |
|
MurphyD Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 14 |
Apr 11, 2005 06:53 pm MurphyD wrote: I was 60. Have "dense" tissue, but all previous mammos had been o.k, This showed up as microcalcifications. |
|
aprilmaestr
Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 159 |
Apr 11, 2005 07:02 pm aprilmaestri wrote: I was (and am) 41 when diagnosed on 1/7/05. |
|
wakebrat7 Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 200 |
Apr 11, 2005 07:14 pm
wakebrat7 wrote:
I was 40, diagnosed 10/04. Stage IIB. Lillie |
|
iodine Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 7128 |
Apr 11, 2005 07:23 pm iodine wrote: One month after my 59th birthday. (fortunately, i had delayed it for a family vacation, glad I didn't know on vacation) It was on the films from the previous year, but not identified. Most lesions have been there for about 7-8 years. We were actually watching microcals on the other breast for about 6 years. Go figure! |
|
toree Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 88 |
Apr 11, 2005 07:30 pm toree wrote: Originally saw my family dr approx. Dec. 18th, 2003 as felt lump. Did mammogram & ultrasound first part of Jan. Told it was cyst. Back in Oct 2004 to have cyst aspirated with ultrasound - saw surgeron instead as ultrasound looked iffy, and on Nov. 16th had lumpectomy. Found out moderately differentiated invasive ductal carcinoma, Stage II on Dec 2nd. Estrogen and progesterone negative. Back in on the 17th for sentinel node and take out more tissue. Turned 48 on Dec. 14th. Finally got started on chemo March 3rd. Treatment is every 21 days for 6 treatments and then 6 weeks of radiation (5 days on/2 off). |
|
3strikes Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 1105 |
Apr 11, 2005 07:39 pm 3strikes wrote: I was 37 back in the day of my original dx. Am now 49 and still playing the game. |
|
nosurrender
Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 4692 |
Apr 11, 2005 08:15 pm
nosurrender wrote:
I was 39 and it was in 2001. I had my cancer for 6 months. It was a fast growing sucker and I was really lucky to have found it when I did! |
|
Mitla96 Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 785 |
Apr 11, 2005 08:26 pm
Mitla96 wrote:
I was 49-just a month from my 50th birthday. janet |
|
Carol_D Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 631 |
Apr 11, 2005 08:48 pm Carol_D wrote: I was 41 at diagnosis in 9/04. Have since turned 42. |
|
JoJo Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 736 |
Apr 11, 2005 10:38 pm
JoJo wrote:
Hi Joyce Anne, how are you doing? I was 43 when I was diagnosed with bilateral IDC in Feb. 2004. Hope things are going well for you. |
|
LouiseB Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 182 |
Apr 12, 2005 01:53 am LouiseB wrote: 52y/o diagnosed w/2cm IDC on 6/17/04 that was not present on mammogram done 9 months prior....a fast-growing bugger. |
|
mpwolfe Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 169 |
Apr 12, 2005 02:29 am
mpwolfe wrote:
I was 49 when dx in 5/04 with IDC. I have turned 50 since then. Mary |
|
Maria_C_ Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 1050 |
Apr 12, 2005 02:43 am
Maria_C_ wrote:
I was 36, Dx. 07/2004 - IDC. II, made 37 around those days too. |
|
LyndaH Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 126 |
Apr 12, 2005 03:04 am LyndaH wrote: Wow. So many women in their 30's and early 40's responding to this. My heart goes out to all women going through this, but especially those who are so young. I can't help but wonder, is it the advanced medical technology that allows us to catch this so much earlier than ever before? Or is it something "in the air" (or in the beef, chicken, water, etc.) I prefer to believe the former and feel so very fortunate to have benefited from these advancements myself. I was dx last summer at 48. |
|
mlr Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 31 |
Apr 12, 2005 03:26 am
mlr wrote:
I am 43 and have not been dx yet. I have a biopsy next Wednesday for 2 small clusters of calcifications. First to have any type of problem on either side of my family , my 3 sisters have all been clear w/ no problems. Blessings to all of you.
|
|
kimmytoo Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 3216 |
Apr 12, 2005 03:26 am kimmytoo wrote: I was 31 when diagnosed 8/03 - now am 33... |
|
Sunshine Joined: Nov 2001 Posts: 3738 |
Apr 12, 2005 03:32 am Sunshine wrote: I was 38 years old when diagnosed. Now 41. |
|
Jennifer Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 1430 |
Apr 12, 2005 03:52 am Jennifer wrote: I was 40 when I found my breast cancer in the shower doing a BSE in 2002. It must have been fate because I was scheduled for my routine mammo and uiltra sound (had been getting them since 29). I called my gyn and she changed it from a screening to a diagnostic. I pointed out the area to the tech and she did the mammorgram and then place a sticky magnet on the area and redid that side. Next onto the ultra sound and that's when the radiologist came in and also did the ultra sound. After I was dressed she came in and said there was definately something there that should not be and that's when my rollercoaster ride began. Well at least that's what it looks like but I beleive it began 15 months earlier when there was something there and we repeated the mammo and ultra sound 3 months later it was gone. I have a hard time believing it was gone and then a year later it's back. But I am grateful we found it and the medical professions did not just blow me off. I turned 43 this past February and hope to see 83. |
|
Sachi Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 2641 |
Apr 12, 2005 03:58 am
Sachi wrote:
I was 43 when diagnosed. I'll be 46 this month!! Barb |
|
kats Joined: May 2003 Posts: 2770 |
Apr 12, 2005 04:16 am
kats wrote:
I was 48 when diagnosed, I'm 50 now.
My mom was 73 when diagnosed, she's 84 now. |
|
Marie_S_ Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 578 |
Apr 12, 2005 04:19 am
Marie_S_ wrote:
I was diagnosed with a small tumor with a mixture of low grade IDC and DCIS in February 2004...just a week after my 49th birthday. The tumor showed up on the first mammogram I'd had after skipping them for about 7 years. I was already in menopause at diagnosis and now I'm 50!!(still can't believe I'm really that old!! )
|
|
CasinoGirl Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 1227 |
Apr 12, 2005 04:22 am
CasinoGirl wrote:
Was dx w/ IDC in Oct '04 at 42. Will turn 43 in June. Donna |
|
Fitztwins Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 5357 |
Apr 12, 2005 04:27 am Fitztwins wrote: 39 when I noticed something was not right. I had just turned 40 before I was dx in December 2004. |
|
JillCR Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 170 |
Apr 12, 2005 04:50 am JillCR wrote: I was 33 when diagnosed and had my surgery the day before I turned 34. I finished chemo and on my third week of radiation and I'm feeling good. |
|
dazedandcon
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 459 |
Apr 12, 2005 04:51 am dazedandconfused wrote: I was diagnosed a month after my 49th birthday. |
© 2008 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.