Hi, everybody.
Like all of you triple negative friends, I was diagnosed on Sept. 1st with IDC, Grade 3, triple negative, tumor size 1.7 cm based on ultrasound, 4x3 based on clinical examination. Pet scan was clear and bi-lateral MRI showed only the local tumor (I'm still waiting for the full report to see the degrees of invasion). After a lot of research and soul-searching, I decided to go with neo-adjuvant chemo (AC followed by T) in hopes to see a) whether I respond to standard chemo and b) to hopefully kill any free cells travelling through my body early on. I had to persuade the local oncologist about neo-adjuvant since I was not a prime candidate for it (less than 5 cm in size) but I talked to several people at research universities and although some said there is 'no difference', others advocated the neo-adjuvant. I'm just wondering if any of you did something similar and how it went for you (I was told that survival rate doesn't change but most of the studies that were done were with older types of chemo treatments).
| Posts 1 - 30 (170 total) | |
|---|---|
|
Karyll Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 235 |
Sep 24, 2007 11:56 pm
Karyll wrote:
We are still checking if I am stage 3 or 4 but for sure I am triple negative. My tumor was 3.5 cm and my surgeon recomended a radical modified mastectomy because the cancer is so aggressive. I had that and was glad because I also had 12/14 positive nodes plus three Sentinal Nodes all positive. I start chemo on Thursday, 5 weeks after having the mastectomy. Iknow many doctors follow different protocols but I was so relieved to have the main tumor out of there. (Plus it was very painful). Did they want to do surgery first? is that why the onc was reluctant? Karyll Dx 8/14/2007, IDC, Stage IIIb, Grade 3, 15/17 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER- |
|
Negative3Gr
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 101 |
Sep 25, 2007 12:28 am
Negative3Grade3 wrote:
Yes, the local oncologist (I live in a small town) thought I was not a typical candidate but when I brought in other opinions, he agreed on going with neo-adjuvant. But then again I had to 'fight' for how the chemo will be given (they wanted to split the AC before surgery and then T after), so I had to bring in again the expert opinions from research and cancer centers, so at at least for now we are settled on giving the whole treatment upfront pending of course what response I have to it. I'm going in for my second treatment on Oct. 1 |
|
Sadie-Rose Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 205 |
Sep 25, 2007 05:21 pm, edited Sep 25, 2007 09:44 PM
by Sadie-Rose
Sadie-Rose wrote:
Hi Everyone, This is my first time to respond on this topic. I have triple negative bc. I am three years out from treatment with no new signs of the disease. My oncologist was very excited at my last visit because the three year mark is a big one for us. In the beginning, I had a surgery to remove 14 lymph nodes with one positive. I then had chemotherapy and we watched my tumor to see if it would get smaller before surgery and to make sure the chemo was working. My tumor was 3.9 c. It did not get smaller on the AC cocktail so after 9 weeks we switched to 6 rounds of TC. It did shrink enough that my doctor felt the chemotherapy had been effective. I then had my tumor removed with breast saving techniques. I had a full 6 1/2 of radiation. Today I feel really well. Sadie |
|
Negative3Gr
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 101 |
Sep 25, 2007 05:57 pm
Negative3Grade3 wrote:
Thank you for sharing your story, Sadie-Rose.
|
|
Sadie-Rose Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 205 |
Sep 25, 2007 09:48 pm
Sadie-Rose wrote:
Hi Negative3Grade3, Where are you at in your treatment? If I can answer any questions please ask. Warmly, Sadie-Rose |
|
Negative3Gr
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 101 |
Sep 25, 2007 11:52 pm
Negative3Grade3 wrote:
I'm just finishing the first treatment (10th day tomorrow, Wednesday, Sept. 26) and I'm scheduled for #2 treatment on October 1st. I've been reading about assessing the response of the tumor to neo-adjuvant based on patholology, clinical exam, and radiology and I'm just wondering how your doctor determined that there was no effect with AC? By the way, that's what I'm starting with and we'll see. So far I have tolerated the AC fairly well but all that I care is what it does to the tumor. I'm willing to put up with whatever to get better. By the way, based on what I read T in combination with AC prior to surgery (at least in some studies) seemed to have the best effect but then others have told me that from the three, the A and T seem to be the most promising and yet in your case is was CT! It shows that they don't have a target yet for Triple Negative but one has to find what works for the submarker of an individual. And thank you for your interest in me because as I said in an earlier posting I felt rather lonely with my decision to go with neoadjuvant. |
|
Sadie-Rose Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 205 |
Sep 26, 2007 12:43 am, edited Sep 29, 2007 06:58 PM
by Sadie-Rose
Sadie-Rose wrote:
Hi Again Neative 3Grade3, When I was first diagnosed there was a debate about what I should do first chemotherapy or do surgery. I asked what the concerns were. My doctors said that if we do surgery first we won't know if the chemotherapy is working because we won't have the tumor to check to make sure it is reducing in size. Then they said if we do chemotherapy first we won't know if the cancer had gone in the lymphnodes because the chemo would impact their cells. I suggested we do part of the surgery first, remove the lymph nodes to check to see if there were any cancer cells in them. I had one positive node. Then we could do chemo therapy to reduce the size of the tumor before my second surgery. This would be breast conserving because my tumor was 3.9 and I wanted a lumpectomy. After the first three treatments we did an MRI and there had been no change in the size of the tumor. We stopped the AC and changed the chemo cocktail. I was really sad at the time and felt hopeless. Here I had endured 9 weeks of chemo and lost my hair with no impact. Then my doctor told me we would have to add on an two extra rounds of the new medication. I had 9 rounds of chemotherapy in all. The tumor did respond this time, not as much as the surgeon had wanted, but enough to feel assured it had responded. We did the second surgery and got clear margins. Then I completed radiation. My doctors have scheduled MRIs, Mammograms, PET scans and more all coming back free of cancer. Now I am three years out from treatment. I am really please my ocologist was so vigilant! Sadie |
|
Sadie-Rose Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 205 |
Sep 26, 2007 12:43 am, edited Sep 26, 2007 01:00 AM
by Sadie-Rose
Sadie-Rose wrote:
Hi Again Neative 3Grade3, When I was first diagnosed there was a debate about what I should do first, chemotherapy or surgery. I asked what the concerns were. My doctors said that if we do surgery first and then chemotherapy, we won't know if the chemo is working because we won't have the tumor to measure to make sure it is reducing in size. But they said, if we do chemotherapy first we won't know if the cancer has moved into the lymph nodes because the chemo would impact their cells. I suggested we do the surgery in two parts; remove the lymph nodes first to check to see if there were any cancer cells in them. Then we could do chemo therapy to reduce the size of the tumor before my second surgery to remove the tumor. This would be breast conserving because my tumor was 3.9 and I wanted a lumpectomy. After the first three treatments we did an MRI and there had been no change in the size of my tumor. We stopped the AC and changed the chemo cocktail. I was really sad at the time and felt hopeless. Here I had endured 9 weeks of chemo and lost my hair with no impact. Then my oncologist told me we would have to add on two extra rounds of the new medication. I had 9 rounds of chemotherapy in all. The tumor did respond this time, not as much as the surgeon had wanted, but enough to feel assured it had responded. We did the second surgery and got clear margins. Then I completed radiation. My doctors have scheduled MRIs, Mammograms, PET scans and more all coming back free of cancer.Now I am three years out from treatment. I am really please my ocologist was so vigilant! Sadie |
|
Negative3Gr
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 101 |
Sep 26, 2007 07:08 am
Negative3Grade3 wrote:
Thank you, Sadie. It sounds your oncologist was very vigilant, indeed! I didn't have this kind of luck with the local oncologist but the others we consulted from cancer centers and a very good friend of mine who is a radiation oncologist with ties to MD Anderson helped me make my decision. I debated about the sentinel node test prior to chemo and as recently as last month at a conference in Hawaii there was a debate about whether you do it prior to chemo or after chemo during surgery. I decided to forgo the sentinel node test and start the chemo since I knew, no matter what, I need to treat the tumor aggressively since mine was GRADE III. I know I'll never find out how many lymph nodes I had involved in the first place but hopefully the underlying issue of the cells going places will be addressed through chemo. I'll keep my fingers crossed that I respond but I'll try not to be demoralized as much if the first line of defense doesn't work, knowing that, at least in your case, another kind of combination of treatment worked so well. I can't thank you enough for sharing your story.
|
|
Sadie-Rose Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 205 |
Sep 26, 2007 09:41 am, edited Sep 26, 2007 09:44 AM
by Sadie-Rose
Sadie-Rose wrote:
Good Morning Christina, It was my pleasure to share. Are you in the middle of chemo treatment? If you are I would suggest that after three treatments you ask your doctor to do an MRI to see if the tumor is getting smaller. That will tell you if the chemo is working on your particular tumor. I was stage IIb and grade 3 too. It was interesting for me to hear how you made your decision and it makes sense. I know I had one positive node, but I don't think knowing that changed my treatment in any way. We already knew we had to treat this cancer aggressively. It sounds to me like you and your consultants made a wise decision for you and it was helpful for me to hear their reasonings. There is always more than one perspective. As you take this journey if you have any questions please ask me. I will always answer them as best I can. Warmly, Sadie |
|
twink Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 1564 |
Sep 26, 2007 06:58 pm, edited Sep 27, 2007 07:30 AM
by twink
twink wrote:
Hi Christina and Sadie. I too was diagnosed with Trip Neg (Gr III) IDC (3.5 cm) in my left breast. Long story short, I opted for neoadjuvant chemo. I did 4 DD AC, followed by 4 DD Taxotere. The AC didn't seem to have much of an impact -- the Tx didn't reduce the size noticeably (but we didn't have a good baseline since the MRI, Mammo, and U/S were pre-incisional biopsy). The doc remarked that the chemo seemed to be affecting the density of the mass. The Taxotere, however, did have a very noticeable impact. I finished T on May 24th and underwent the bilateral mastectomy (with immediate reconstruction / implants and Alloderm) on June 6th. Intraoperatively, the SNB came back negative (Yay!). The path report, which came back a week later, showed micro mets in the two sentinel nodes and one volunteered with breast tissue. I underwent a full AND on July 6th. All 14 nodes came back negative. They (onc and BS) told me I was done with treatment. I sought a second opinion at a local teaching hospital. I was very concerned about the presence of micro mets post chemo. I just had my 3rd of 4 Carboplatin infusions today. Last one is scheduled for October 17th -- another Yay! I consulted with a radiation oncologist who has recommended I close off this nightmare with radiation therapy. The tumor was largish. Three nodes were positive (albeit with micromets, but who knows what was there pre chemo -- nothing 'lit' up on the PET/CT scan but doesn't mean much). The cancer is triple negative and Grade III. I just turned 51 last week...so should have plenty of years left in me. There are issues with neoadjuvant treatment. I chose this approach so that I could possibly have a lumpectomy option. I realized mid-Tx that I couldn't live with that option. I wanted a bilateral mastectomy to be done with it (emotional, yes, but...). I will never be absolutely certain about my 'stage' at diagnosis. That's the biggest problem. Worst case...probably Stage IIb. I don't have access to much in the way of meaningful stats -- recurrence risk, survival. That could be a bit of a blessing I suppose. It was nice to see the chemo take the tumor from about 3.5 cm to <2 mm at the time of surgery! Hmm...not really a short story...sorry for rambling. Why limit happy to an hour?
|
|
Negative3Gr
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 101 |
Sep 26, 2007 10:45 pm
Negative3Grade3 wrote:
Hi, Pa, and happy birthday! I'm turning 47 in November and like you, I'd like to be around for many years but let's see what happens:-) Thank you for sharing your story. I realize that you took a conservative approach with the bi-lateral. I've been reading the literature on patterns of recurrence of the triple negative and it seems that we're more in danger of distant metastasis than local recurrence but I'm not a doctor. I'm just trying to learn as much as I can about my enemy and what the medical community has discovered thus far. Was the bi-lateral recommended by all the doctors you consulted or you reached your decision based on your feeling more secure with the future, which I would perfectly understand! As for the radiation, I think you are doing the right thing. I read of a study that was done that compared surgery, chemo, with and without radiation and patients with radiation had much better rates of lack of local recurrence. And congratulations on finishing your treatments very soon! You must feel so elated! I'm going in on Oct. 1st for my second treatment (I'm doing dense dosage too) and I can't wait to lose my hair:-) :-) I have ways to go... |
|
Sadie-Rose Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 205 |
Sep 26, 2007 11:53 pm, edited Sep 26, 2007 11:59 PM
by Sadie-Rose
Sadie-Rose wrote:
Hi Twink It's interesting that AC didn't have much of an impact for you. It didn't for me either. We tried 3 rounds and found it did not shrink the tumor at all. My oncologist decided I should do 6 more rounds of Tx and Carboplatin. The tumor did decrease in size. I wonder if triple negative cancers don't respond well to the AC cocktail? My oncologist is from a teaching hospital and she stays up on research. My treatment started in 2002 and she knew about the success of Carboplatin and TX together. She told me it is part of the standard treatment now for triple negative cancers. Hope you are doing well now. Warmly, Sadie PS I just wanted to add that I also did radiation treatment for 6 1/2 weeks. I have hit the 3 year mark after treatment! |
|
Sadie-Rose Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 205 |
Sep 27, 2007 12:24 am, edited Sep 29, 2007 07:09 PM
by Sadie-Rose
Sadie-Rose wrote:
Negative 3 Grade 3, Your are about to start the journey to save your life. I focused on the chemotherapy as my friend helping me tackle this intruder in my body. I also did acupuncture. My acupunturist gave me an Eastern herbal medication called Chemo Support. I took vitamins too. I had to come to a compromise with my oncologist about the vitamins. We decided I would take them but stop two days before my treatment and not take them for three days after. She was okay with the Chemo Support formula. She was always amazed at how quickly my blood counts came up. She now sends her patients to my acupuncturist. I also spent time visualizing little fish in my body eating the cancer cells. Some people imagine sharks or other aggressive things, but I wanted a gentle picture. My fish were little and gold and very hungry for cancer cells. This may sound funny but there is a lot of research that shows we can improve our immune systems with a mind over matter approach. Your "just starting out" has reminded me of some things I did to prepare for the treatments. If you haven't had anyone give ideas I could offer a few. Warmly, Sadie |
|
Negative3Gr
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 101 |
Sep 27, 2007 10:12 am
Negative3Grade3 wrote:
Hi, Sadie.
|
|
twink Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 1564 |
Sep 27, 2007 12:37 pm, edited Sep 27, 2007 12:37 PM
by twink
twink wrote:
Hi Christina, Re the bilat...my BS recommended this approach initially, then gave me the neo-adjuvant option. The onc had no opinion. When I told the BS I'd made my decision he said he completely agreed. He remarked that my rationale was probably more emotional but he felt it was the right approach medically too. I understood that the lumpectomy/radiation option was pretty well equivalent (in terms of recurrence and survival stats) to the bilat mast option. I went for the bilat anyway. I couldn't imagine going through this again frankly. t Why limit happy to an hour?
|
|
Negative3Gr
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 101 |
Sep 29, 2007 11:26 am, edited Oct 9, 2007 09:08 PM
by Negative3Grade3
Negative3Grade3 wrote:
Thank you so much fro your response, Twink. I'll have to cross that bridge a little later, I guess, so I have some time to think about it. I agree with you. The thought of going through this again is too much. For the time being, I'm focused on the chemo treatment and see if I respond to the CA regimen or I need to be switched to T+ something like you had to do and Sadie. I'll let you know what the oncologist said when I see him on Monday. Have a nice weekend. |
|
Sadie-Rose Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 205 |
Sep 29, 2007 07:46 pm, edited Sep 29, 2007 07:49 PM
by Sadie-Rose
Sadie-Rose wrote:
Hi Christina, I wanted to answer your question about the vitamins. I took a multi-vit, C, E, Cal w/D., fish oil, and mag. My oncologist suggested I take glutamine ( I'm not sure I spelled that correctly) to prevent nerve damage in my hands and feet. Although I had some numbness before I started the glut I don't have any evidence of it now. My acupuncturist is also a RN. She worked with cancer patients as a nurse. She had calmed my concerns about the vitamin debate by reminding me that I had taken the vitamins for a long time. She said a few months without them wouldn't impact my health much. I just couldn't come to grips with the fact that at the time I needed my immune system to be at it's best, that I would take away it's supports. I did understand their concern that they wanted the chemotherapy to get into my cells and stay there for awhile. I think we came to a comfortable agreement. I had chemo every three weeks, so the two days off before and three days off after my treatment worked for me. I thought I'd mention I was a college professor before I went into my private career. I had the same approach to research as you did. I read everything, more than once. It reminded me of a time when I was working with parents who had just had an infant with special needs. These new parents would read everything they could and go to every specialist they could find to help their babies. The intense focus also served to help them with their grief. We called that time of grief as the "speeds." I was really speeding around. I looked it as if I was entering this new culture. I needed to know the language (vocabulary), so I could have intelligent conversations with my doctors and so I could advocate for myself. Later in my treatment I calmed that need and it was a relief to not be consumed with reading. The information I read was helpful, but they always talked about the vast complications or side effects one could have. But not everyone has everything. I think it caused me some anxiety, but I had to do it! I probably got off topic so I'll stop. Enjoy Suday, Sadie |
|
Sadie-Rose Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 205 |
Sep 29, 2007 07:51 pm
Sadie-Rose wrote:
Twink, I just reread some of the comments from last week and realized you are close to finishing your treatments. How are you feeling? Where are your spirits at? Just wanted you to know I was thinking about you. Warmly, Sadie |
|
Negative3Gr
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 101 |
Oct 1, 2007 04:31 pm
Negative3Grade3 wrote:
Hi, everybody.
|
|
TINAMAE Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 86 |
Oct 1, 2007 05:48 pm
TINAMAE wrote:
Hello negative3grade3, I too have triple negative my tumor was 4.5 cm at start of chemo had 4 ac and my tumor is so small they cant feel it at all, next is surgery in about 3 weeks , my dr said dont worry about being triple neg it really is just about biology and how you respond to treatment, even though I wish I wasnt . Just keep a positive attitude and have faith in God, he is what has gotten me through this.I wish you luck with your chemo. Hugs Tina |
|
twink Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 1564 |
Oct 1, 2007 05:56 pm, edited Oct 1, 2007 05:56 PM
by twink
twink wrote:
Aww..thanks Sadie. I am close to being finished...one more to go on October 17th. That'll be it for chemo, then, on to rads. Overall I'm doing pretty well. Carboplatin is easier than AC and Taxotere. Why limit happy to an hour?
|
|
Negative3Gr
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 101 |
Oct 1, 2007 09:59 pm
Negative3Grade3 wrote:
Thank you so much, Tina. Your news is very exciting and encouraging for any triple negative and grade three friend out there. It also shows that although at this point, we are all in one big category, soon, they should be able to identify specific submarkers to target with individualized therapy (I read of a study from Great Britain that focused on a CK14 marker, for example. Having a positive attitude and faith in whatever makes you feel strong is very important but also having friends like all of you makes me, at least, feel, so much better. So thank you all! I affectionately refer to our group as the sisterhood of triple negative friends:-) |
|
cathie Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 1 |
Oct 9, 2007 01:06 pm
cathie wrote:
Hi, My biopsy revealed a 2.2cm. in Aug 07. I had a lumpectomy 2 weeks later. clear margins and neg nodes. However if I had not asked the nurse for a copy of my path report a week later at my post op appt., I never would have known that I was triple neg, grade 3. The report stated that the triple neg finding was from the biopsy. I was never told any of this. I was not referred to an ocologist prior to surgery or given any options other that a lumpectomy or mastectomy. I am now having some serious doubts about whether I should have considered neoadjuvant therapy. I had my first AC which I will get every 2 weeks for eight weeks, followed by weekly Taxol for 16 weeks , followed by radiotherapy. None of my health care providers explained my sub-type to me. I had to bring it up myself. I have downloaded a veritable library of information concerning triple neg. Has anyone been given Abraxene instead of the Taxol? If so let me know what you know about it. Thanks for listening. |
|
Negative3Gr
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 101 |
Oct 9, 2007 08:51 pm
Negative3Grade3 wrote:
Dear Cathie,
|
|
FloridaLady
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 459 |
Oct 9, 2007 09:47 pm
FloridaLady wrote:
Hi Carthie, I think you only can receive Abraxene if you have mets. It's for liver, lung or bone mets. I did not get told about the path report until I asked. Then I had to do the research about it. All they would say is it was a young lady bc and more aggressive. Living in hope Fla |
|
Indigoblue Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 435 |
Oct 11, 2007 12:44 am, edited Oct 11, 2007 12:59 AM
by Indigoblue
Indigoblue wrote:
Hi Fellow Triple-negatives, Friends, It's upsetting to see us all in this confused smattering of advice and information from the medical professionals who "know better" than we do about the possible pro's and con's of treatments offered to the sub-types, such as triple negatives. It's my understanding that neoadjuvant chemo is supposed to shrink the tumor and any possible microcells which may have escaped through the blood or lymphatic system. Reducing the size before surgery, also reduces the risk of distant mets. I was not offered this option, never given the "actual" realistic statistics regarding triple negative aggressive activities. This is why the physicians generally give patients the most effective treatments available, depending on the "price-guide". I am disappointed that a bilateral was not offered, especially since I have family history, cysts, calcifications and nodules. Less than two years later, pain has returned, and I am considering "no more treatment". Sick of the entire mess, frankly. From what I understand, Abraxane is rarely offered due to it's High Cost $$$$$, and instead, Taxol, the less expensive version of the drug, is often given; especially to the "grade 3" patients. Unless, ofcourse, you know someone who will help guide you through these treatments, you truly walk into treatment "blind, deaf, and dumb". I had a "Helen Keller" moment after reading and researching the endless mounds of paperwork, books, medical libraries, and getting to know some of the medical personel. In a sense, triple negative patients become a short term investment for insurance companies, doctors, hospitals, etc. If we don't "act" and "know" quickly what options are available and what our disease involves, then we are the losers. Follow-up treatment, acupuncture, a vitamin protocol and nutritional advice is almost never offered at most hospitals/clinics. I have extreme pain in, under, around my breast, and breasts, in the ribs, shoulders, spine, neck. Pain pills (which I never, or rarely use) are not helping. I cannot think, or even consider who to call since I know they will give me the "usual " line...and more expensive tests only to find out it's a waiting game. If cancer shows up on a Pet Scan it means you have a mets, according to my sources. The cell size don't appear until they are 2mm. , occurring most likely in the bones, lungs, or liver, and possibly the brain. Before I began my breast cancer tour through the fantasy world of "Cancerland", I had great faith in science, physicians and was extremely hopeful and fearless. Now, no matter what the decision or dx. I feel uncertain, misguided and lied to by every physician, hospital and testing service in which I was treated. I wish, at least one human being offered information about any of the topics you have discussed here. Dense breasts, hormone receptors, the suseptibility of cancer spreading without having a bilateral, a the "push" to have so-called lumpectomies, which are just an easy way of saying "lesser mastectomy"; that definition should only apply to in-situ, and even then the chances of different types of cancers appearing are indeed a liability. Thank you for all your input, strength and sharing of valuable enlightening information. I only wish more women had access to this sight and that the "appearance" of a breast, and the "appearance" of a triple negative aggressive cancer are two entirely different matters. Thanks. Indi "It's All Your Fault"
Dx 12/15/2005, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 3, 0/4 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2- |
|
Skippy123 Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 11 |
Oct 13, 2007 03:40 pm
Skippy123 wrote:
Indigo, I've been reading some of your posts. You're pissed. Like you, I get really angry...wanting to get OFF of the cancer train. I'm sick of the attention, sick of the nebulous responses to my questions from my onc, who I do like, and sick of the negative press in the media relating to triple negative breast cancer. I'm tired of people telling me that their grandmother and great aunt had survived breast cancer for 30+ years, etc., you know the stories. For what it's worth, the Triple Negative Breast Cancer Foundation is sponsoring a focused session on tnbc at the 2007 breast cancer symposium in San Antonio this December. You can get more info on it at www.tnbcfoundation.org. The ladies comprising the foundation's board were featured on Fox Network's Mike and Juliet Show on October 2nd. Together they did a really nice job focusing attention on tnbc and the need to find specialized treatment for our disease. I believe the link to the show's segment on tnbc is still on their website at www.mandjshow.com . The link can also be found at the tnbc foundation's website. Indi - I know you're pissed. Thank you for your honesty. It's how I feel some of the time also. Negative3Grade3 - Good luck! I was diagnosed in late July of this year. I did my first round of Taxol this past Wednesday. I finished 4 DD A/C 2 weeks ago. I haven't had surgery yet. That bridge I get to cross in January. Skippy in Austin Dx 7/24/2007, IDC, 3cm, Stage IIIc, Grade 3, ER-/PR-, HER2- |
|
HollyHopes Joined: Feb 2007 Posts: 347 |
Oct 13, 2007 04:26 pm, edited Oct 13, 2007 04:27 PM
by HollyHopes
HollyHopes wrote:
Hello dear ladies and warriors! I was dx in Feb 07 with Trip Neg. I am now post lumpectomy, dose dense AC/T and 7 weeks of rads. I had follow-up appts with my surgeon and med onc this past week and am officially 'disease free'. It was a long and hard journey but I feel so good now. I will see onc every 12 weeks for the next 2 years to check tumor markers and LFT's. I wish each one of you health and peace. Please let me know if I can help. Dx 2/7/2007, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 3, 0/3 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2- |
|
FloridaLady
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 459 |
Oct 13, 2007 06:33 pm
FloridaLady wrote:
Indi, I hear you sooo well and the truth hurts. I been through 3 cancers center. One MDA #1 and one other top 10 research center. I had very aggressive bc from the on set. Dx stage IIIc a 7 mm tumor. I had surgery first and than DD ACT my bc tripled in size while on chemo than did rads and it cancer spread to skin. Why did they not do bilat. mast? I asked for one. Now I find out I should not have had rads because the chemo can not treat my locally aggressive chest wall through damaged blood cells. We knew this info before rads. I think they did not take my other breast because they thought I would not live long enough to make a difference. I had 27 nodes positive first mast. and they told my family I had 3 to 6 months because it was so aggressive. Well I'm 2 years out and have been in treatment the whole time. (7 diff chemo's a total of 24 hits and 3 surgeries & Rads & 51 Nodes positive) Now I have been told that I have beat the odds so far because I only have a few small nodes behind chest wall positive and I have ran through all the "protocols". All three centers have told me that they have ran out of options. Or I could do very experimental Phase I only drug trials. I have decided to take a break from treatment and wait and see if they come up with something new. I love how everyone is quick to tell you about trials but I don't hear of anyone doing one. I did one and what a bad experience. My other complaint is when are they going to tell us bc warriors how to take better care of are selves in treatment and after. I think I learn more on this site or reading than I ever did from the doc. I feel great and have worked through out my tx. This because I have educated myself on eating and supplements not from any doc's care. Help! I have cancer and they are guessing on what to do next. Living in hope Fla |
© 2008 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.