Has anyone had this test? And, does anyone know how long it would take to get it?
| Posts 1 - 7 (7 total) | |
|---|---|
|
Cathy-CA Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 232 |
Apr 20, 2008 03:50 pm
Cathy-CA wrote:
I did not have it and here's why. I discussed it with my onc and her concern was that only one study shows a link between topo 2 and adriamycin's effectivenss. That study (according to her) was a retrospective study meaning they went back and looked at existing data rather than designing a study to specifically test for this. There can be unaccounted for variables in a retrospective study that end up leading to conclusions that can't be replicated. She felt my learning whether or not I was topo 2 shouldn't be the sole basis for making a treatment decision. That's not to say that new research may not come along that makes it as important to know as Her2 or hormone receptor status, but for now, she felt it wasn't critical information. Her explanation made sense to me and since I had already decided I didn't want adriamycin, I didn't bother with the test. I can't believe that postponing the start of chemo by a week or two to wait for results will be a problem for your oncologist. Since attitude is such an important piece of the equation, if you feel more confident in your decision by testing for this first, you should do it. Dx 10/24/2007, IDC, 2cm, Stage IIa, Grade 3, 0/3 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2+ |
|
TenderIsOur
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 2913 |
Apr 20, 2008 05:23 pm, edited Apr 20, 2008 05:50 PM
by TenderIsOurMight
TenderIsOurMight wrote:
It cannot be emphasized too strongly that treatment of each patient is a highly individualized matter. (FDA-approved labeling for warfarin (Coumadin) NDA 9-218/5-105)
|
|
TenderIsOur
Joined: May 2007 Posts: 2913 |
Apr 20, 2008 05:54 pm
TenderIsOurMight wrote:
It cannot be emphasized too strongly that treatment of each patient is a highly individualized matter. (FDA-approved labeling for warfarin (Coumadin) NDA 9-218/5-105)
|
|
Erica2 Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 80 |
Apr 21, 2008 07:19 am
Erica2 wrote:
Cathy and TomatoJuice, I didn't get the TOPO test either. In my case my oncol was pushing me hard to start therapy. I was 7 or 8 weeks beyond DX and he thought that was getting very near the limit of what he was comfortable with. In my case from all that I had read I really didn't think the test would have changed my decision anyway so there was no need. Glad you are near the end. Also good for you for not postponning the fun things in life in the midst of all this. Distractions are good for the soul.
|
|
katymom Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 133 |
Apr 22, 2008 09:31 pm
katymom wrote:
Tomatojuice: I did have the topIIA test......I have read good reports on it... I am her2 positive, ER+. My topIIA test was non amplified which means that the anthracyclines would not have been as effective for me. Therefore, I chose to go with TCH.....based on the BCIRG0006 clinical trial. It didn't take long to get the blood test back from the lab in California.....Good luck with your decision. I am personally glad that I did not have to combine an anthracycline with Herceptin. |
|
janet11 Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 449 |
May 7, 2008 04:11 pm
janet11 wrote:
My onc requested the topoII test for me too, and based on its results, I had TCH. That was over a year ago. She says that now she wouldn't request the test, but she would STILL have recommended TCH for me. Janet Dx 7/21/2006, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 3, 0/4 nodes, ER-/PR-, HER2+ |
|
AlaskaAngel
Joined: Jun 2005 Posts: 85 |
May 7, 2008 05:33 pm, edited May 7, 2008 05:33 PM
by AlaskaAngel
AlaskaAngel wrote:
Hi Janet! I was treated 6 years ago before there was any real info about TOPO II, but I'd love to know my TOPO II just out of pure curiousity since I am still NED and I never had either a taxane or trastuzumab. But sadly back then the treatment was not AC it was CAF, so I did get the 5-FU (reported to cause chemobrain damage that gets worse as time goes by). Likely some of the drugs used currently will have long-term adverse effects as well, and we just don't know yet what they are. We just have to hope for the best. A.A. Dx 12/3/2001, IDC, 1.6 cm, Stage I, Grade 3, 0/1 nodes SNB, ER+/PR+, HER2+++ |
© 2008 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.