Just what the Subject is asking.
Im hoping to find some Her2+ with a Low Score Oncotype DX ...Since I didnt have enough tissue to test.
I am wondering if it every happens.
If you did get a low #. What was your stage & grade also.
Thanks,
Pam
| Posts 1 - 17 (17 total) | |
|---|---|
|
Dejaboo Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1021 |
May 12, 2008 03:06 pm
Dejaboo wrote:
bump Anyone? Dx 3/7/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/1 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2+ |
|
magentagirl
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 34 |
May 12, 2008 03:24 pm
magentagirl wrote:
I am new to all this and I don't know what you mean by low onco type score. please advise |
|
jpann39 Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 2742 |
May 12, 2008 04:00 pm
jpann39 wrote:
Pam, I dont know if this will help but my info is: IDC, 2.4 cm, node negative, Stage 2, Grade 1....her2 negative.....onco score 12... I had lumpectomy w/snb and 37 rads...now on tamoxifen. And doing wonderfully. I had my 6 month followups last week and was told I am NED :) Jule 'Life may not be the party we hoped for...but while we're here we might as well dance!!!!"
|
|
Dejaboo Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1021 |
May 12, 2008 04:07 pm
Dejaboo wrote:
Hi Magentagirl- Oncotype DX is a Test that can be done in CA. for Node Negative ER+. It will give you a # that will help assess your Recurance of BC & Help one decide to do Chemo or not. Some Insurances wont pay for it. But alot will. Someone else can Probably explain it better then Me- Like Otter. Jule, Thanks. Glad you had a Good Score. Great to hear your 6 mo was NED! Im really looking for People with Her2 Positive that had a Low Onco score. Im wondering if there even is any People with that. Dx 3/7/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/1 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2+ |
|
magentagirl
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 34 |
May 13, 2008 10:45 pm
magentagirl wrote:
Thanks Dejaboo. i guess i don't qualify for an onco score now that my node turned out to be positive (the pathologist screwed up!) Is that a chocolate lab in your picture? |
|
swimangel72
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 643 |
May 13, 2008 11:31 pm
swimangel72 wrote:
Hi - sorry I didn't see this thread earlier. I'm Her2+ - yet my oncologist originally told me my Oncotype DX score was "low" (he didn't give me the number). A week later, after he got the results of my Fish test showing that I was Her2+, he told me my Oncotype DX score was "intermediate". When I asked for the number, the nurse-practitioner told me 22 (or maybe it was 23). Then the oncologist said it was higher because we finally got my Fish test results which showed that I was Her2+. I started a thread somewhere else about how my onc himself could change the score from "low" to "intermediate" just because of the Her2+ results......and now I'm anxious to get my hands on the Oncotype DX report to see what it actually says. My onc admitted to being very aggressive treating cancer (which is what I wanted to hear) - but it does cause confusion in my mind when trying to understand how the Oncotype DX score is calculated. I need absolute honesty at all times with this disease! My question is the same as yours then - is it possible to be Her2+ and have a low Oncotype DX score? And must one have a Fish test done BEFORE getting the Oncotype DX results? Or does the company that conducts the Oncotype DX perform their own pathology testing on the tumor, including the FISH?? I hope someone else can answer this question - it IS very confusing! 3/3/08 Right-side mastectomy with immediate Diep
Dx 2/5/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/7 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
Dejaboo Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1021 |
May 14, 2008 08:27 am, edited May 14, 2008 08:28 AM
by Dejaboo
Dejaboo wrote:
Hi Magentagirl- I may be wrong...But I almost think they are just starting to do an Oncotest for Node Positive....Or will be. I think I read that somewhere. Didnt pay alot of attention. You could search or post the question. Sorry to hear your Node came back Positive. My Avatar is a Flat Coated Retriever. Swimangel-I wonder if your Onco said it was low because he felt it was low. But then when the Her2 came back he decided with that added the # now felt Higher to him ? So he interepreted it different after he had all the info in. Dx 3/7/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/1 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2+ |
|
Christianne
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 59 |
May 14, 2008 04:42 pm
Christianne wrote:
Tomorrow I will find out my Onca score. I am dreading the appointment. I am Her positive, so expect chemo will be in my future. I will post when I find out. I am Stage 1, Grade 2. Dx 4/7/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage Ia, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
swimangel72
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 643 |
May 14, 2008 07:35 pm
swimangel72 wrote:
My thoughts exactly Dejaboo.....but I don't really like that kind of "subjective" interpretation. I would have preferred if my onc told me the real numbers from the Oncotype DX and then explained to me about the "gray" area - instead of just saying my score was "low". This is why I really want to see the report - his office said they'll mail it to me today. It won't change my mind about my treatment.....but at least I'll know what the official report said. What is your onc recommending Dejaboo? If you are pre-menopausal, will you go on any anti-estrogen hormone drugs? Good luck tomorrow Christianne - I know that dreaded feeling.....here's hoping you get a low score! 3/3/08 Right-side mastectomy with immediate Diep
Dx 2/5/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/7 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
Dejaboo Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1021 |
May 14, 2008 08:44 pm
Dejaboo wrote:
Yes swimangel he certainly should have told you the #. One Onco says Tamox- even though he knows that is not safe with my heart thing. My Other Onco says to take Nothing... orIf I want to try something she said Zoladex (the Monthly Shot to put me into Menapause for 2 years) I am considering that. Good Luck tomorrow Christianne- I am hoping for a Low score for you! Dx 3/7/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/1 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2+ |
|
Christianne
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 59 |
May 15, 2008 10:53 pm
Christianne wrote:
Thanks for the good luck wishes. Ok, I got my Onco results today. My oncotype score was 20, which is in the bottom of the intermediate range. My oncologist said my risk for recurrence in the next 10 years is 12% and that chemo would only reduce my risk to 9%. He didn't think it was worth it. Another way to say this is that 97 out of 100 women would do no better with chemo and only 3 would benefit. And my doctor felt that the side effects and risks of chemo would outweigh that 3%. So even with a high Her-2 score, which he said is factored into the oncotype test, I didn't get a high risk score back. I was very, very relieved--I totally expected to be in the high risk range. I will start Tamoxifen and be closely monitored. Dx 4/7/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage Ia, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
Dejaboo Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1021 |
May 16, 2008 08:51 am
Dejaboo wrote:
Hi Chistianne Thanks for posting your score. That isnt much benefit that you would gain from the Chemo. Good that you can take Tamox. Did he say how much benefit you will gain with that? Dx 3/7/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/1 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2+ |
|
otter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 2401 |
May 16, 2008 06:48 pm, edited May 16, 2008 06:51 PM
by otter
otter wrote:
Swimangel (and Dejaboo, and others), I don't normally hang out on this thread since I'm not HER2+, but I saw your question about your HER2 report and your Oncotype score: "...is it possible to be Her2+ and have a low Oncotype DX score? And must one have a Fish test done BEFORE getting the Oncotype DX results? Or does the company that conducts the Oncotype DX perform their own pathology testing on the tumor, including the FISH?" Yes, it is mathematically possible to be HER2+ and have a low Oncotype score. The formula for the Oncotype recurrence score contains weighted results of tests for the expression of genes in 7 different "gene groups". Results from 4 of those gene groups add to the recurrence score; results from 3 other groups subtract from it. HER2 is in one of the groups that increases the score, but so are other genes like Ki-67. ER and PR are in a group that subtracts from the score. So, it's all very complicated; but theoretically, even if the HER2 result was positive, it could be counterbalanced by high numbers in the "subtractive" groups or low numbers in the other "additive" groups. And, no, it is not necessary to have a HER2 test result before the samples are sent for Oncotype testing. It's my understanding that only the size of the tumor, a positive result for ER, and negative nodal status, are necessary. Nodal status may be changing, but our insurance companies are not even keeping up with reimbursement for testing on node-negative tumors. Genomic Health does test the tissue for HER2 as a part of Oncotype testing, but they don't include those results with their report. They only include the Oncotype recurrence score and the ER and PR results. You should be able to get a copy of the actual test report--it's part of your medical record, and it includes an interpretation of the results. There is also lots of stuff available on-line, including on the Genomic Health website, that explains the test and its interpretation. otter Dx 1/14/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
Christianne
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 59 |
May 16, 2008 11:43 pm
Christianne wrote:
Dejaboo, You asked about how Tamoxifen would affect my risk recurrence. The Onco results assume you will take Tamoxifen, so it is factored into the score. In fact, it says right on the results sheet that the scores/risk recurrences were based on the study that produced these scores by women who were taking Tamoxifen. Dx 4/7/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage Ia, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
Dejaboo Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 1021 |
May 17, 2008 09:00 am
Dejaboo wrote:
Thats right Christianne, I forgot thats how it is done. Ok- thanks! Your avatar is so relaxing. I wish I was there Dx 3/7/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/1 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2+ |
|
vam923 Joined: May 2007 Posts: 2 |
May 17, 2008 12:06 pm
vam923 wrote:
I am ER+/PR- and HER2+, and my oncotype score was 39... pretty high. My onc explained that because of the HER2+ and PR- status, it would return a fairly high number. However, I did have 4 rounds of TC followed by a year of herceptin, which will be completed this September. I had a very small cancer (0.5 cm), but I had signs of lymphovascular invasion. Even though my pathology returned as low-grade, the oncologist felt it was important to treat the heck out of the cancer, since I was only 28. I am currently on lupron, tamoxifen, and herceptin. I think my chance of recurrence is somehwere between 5 and 7% after all these treatments. |
|
swimangel72
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 643 |
May 18, 2008 02:15 am
swimangel72 wrote:
Thanks Otter for the explanation of the Oncotype DX scoring.....as usual, you were a big help! ![]() 3/3/08 Right-side mastectomy with immediate Diep
Dx 2/5/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/7 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
© 2008 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.