Please help! I am 43 yrs old and diagnosed with breast cancer on 02-14-08. Does anyone have IDC, Stage I cancer, 1.8 cm tumor, her2/neg, ER+ PR+, negative lymph nodes, had a lumpectomy and lymph node biopsy, oncotype dc recurrence score of 13. My oncologist's recommendation is to get chemo treatment. I am waiting to see another dr. to get a second or third opinion. Does anyone have the same diagnosis as me and is having chemo. I definitely know that if I decide not to have chemo I will need radiation therapy and hormonal therapy.
| Posts 1 - 30 (56 total) | |
|---|---|
|
otter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 1863 |
Apr 25, 2008 09:05 pm
otter wrote:
nikkiannej, First, I am not a doctor, so I'm only offering you advice as a fellow BC "survivor" (although I don't quite feel as if I've survived this, yet). I don't have the same dx you have, but I do think you need to talk to a different oncologist. I doubt either of the oncos I consulted would have recommended chemo for a situation like yours. You have a Stage I tumor, it is only Grade I, and your Oncotype score is in the low risk range. I checked your recurrence risk on the AdjuvantOnline website, based on your age and Oncotype score. With surgery plus tamoxifen, your risk of distant recurrence (metastasis) with an Oncotype score of 13 is just 7.9%. That means the likelihood of your living 10 years with no distant recurrence of your tumor is greater than 92%. Depending on the type of chemo you would get, that risk could be decreased, but not very much because it is already so low. For instance, if you are given Adriamycin/Cytoxan (AC), your risk of distant recurrence would drop to 5.6% (an absolute improvement of just 2.3%). If you are given AC followed by Taxotere, your risk would drop to 4.5% (an absolute improvement of 3.4%). Each of the chemo drugs has its own list of short-term and long-term side effects. Some of the side effects can be pretty serious, and some of them occur at a rate that's nearly as high as the gain you would be getting from chemo. Chemo is "do-able", though, so if you decide to get chemo, believe me, you can do it. I wonder what reasons your current onco gave for recommending chemo to you. One might be the size of your tumor. In the past, before tamoxifen and way before Oncotype testing, a lot of women automatically got chemo if their tumors were larger than 1 cm. That's not true anymore, though. It turns out that tamoxifen (or other methods of blocking the effects of estrogen) play a greater role in preventing recurrence than chemotherapy does, for most ER+ PR+ HER2- tumors. All of this is up to you, of course; but I definitely think you need to have someone explain the rationale for chemo (or no chemo). I hope you get this resolved soon. otter Dx 1/14/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
nikkiannej Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 15 |
Apr 25, 2008 09:19 pm
nikkiannej wrote:
Hi Otter, My onco is fairly new. He just started practicing maybe a year or two. My surgeon recommended him. The onco says my oncotype dc recurrence score is on the borderline and that my tumor was 1.8 cm. He said he would not recommend chemo if my recurrence score was 11 or below and if my tumor was 1.3 cm or less. I am definitely going to get a second opinion. The onco said the same as you that if I get chemo it would lessen about 2 percent of recurrence. I already made two other appts to see 2 other onco's. Thank you so much. Nikkiannej Dx 2/14/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
nikkiannej Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 15 |
Apr 25, 2008 09:20 pm
nikkiannej wrote:
Hi Otter, My tumor is Her 2/neg. Dx 2/14/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
wallycat Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 683 |
Apr 25, 2008 09:29 pm
wallycat wrote:
I was under the impression that onco score of 17 or less was a no-brainer for no chemo. I agree, 2nd opinion. My onc said the current rate of thinking is that if chemo offers 4% or less benefit, to try and skip it. I had ILC but yours is a grade 1....and I had a score of 20. Dx 4/07; ILC 1.8cm, ER+/PR+, HER2 neg., Stage 1, Grade II, 0/5 nodes. Bilateral Mast., tamoxifen
|
|
jpann39 Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 2592 |
Apr 25, 2008 09:34 pm
jpann39 wrote:
Oh Yes, Please get a second opinion!!!!! I was stage II because my tumor measured 2.4 cm, but grade 1, no nodes involved, onco score of 12, er/pr+, her2 neg.....my onco never once breathed a word about chemo....I actually asked him...he said that the 1% benefit that I might gain wasnt worth the side effects that could potentially be life long..... I had lumpectomy, snb, 37 rads, hysterectomy, currently taking tamoxifen and Im just at my 18 months from diagnosis and doing wonderful... Jule 'Life may not be the party we hoped for...but while we're here we might as well dance!!!!"
|
|
nikkiannej Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 15 |
Apr 25, 2008 09:37 pm
nikkiannej wrote:
Hi Wallycat, Yes, I am definitely going for a 2nd and a 3rd opinion. I think my onco is a new kid on the block. He is 48 years old. Thank you, Nikkiannej |
|
MAMHOP Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 616 |
Apr 25, 2008 10:58 pm
MAMHOP wrote:
My Oncotype score was a 16 -- I had a 3mm tubular, stage 1, grade 1, no nodes -- I had two opinions and both said no chemo -- additional benefit was not worth the potential long term problems -- I would get a 2nd opinion as well. -- Oncotype scores below 17 are considered low risk. M. |
|
MarieKelly Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 137 |
Apr 26, 2008 07:25 am
MarieKelly wrote:
My diagnosis was similar (grade 1 IDC) with the exceptions that the tumor was smaller at just under 1.0 , 40% of it was grade 1 DCIS and I was 49 at diagnosis and already in menopause. I never had the Oncotype testing. Chemo wasn't even recommended but I would have refused it for this type of cancer even if it had been. The only treatment I had was a lumpectomy and SNB. I refused radiation and I also refused hormonal therapy. It's over 4 years now and I've had no recurrence of that cancer. Definately seek as many opinions as possible to get the best prospective on what treatment is an absolute necessity and what can be safely declined. The odds are greatly in your favor in support of that particular cancer having been completely cured by just surgical excision.
Dx 2/22/2004, IDC, <1cm, Stage Ib, Grade 1, 0/1 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
Aug242007 Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 84 |
Apr 26, 2008 09:09 am
Aug242007 wrote:
Go for a second opinion. I have a very similar diagnosis and Oncotype. Did not do chemo. Melissa Oncotype 11, Melissa
Dx 8/24/2007, IDC, 2cm, Stage II, Grade 1, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
Deen Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 73 |
Apr 26, 2008 09:22 am
Deen wrote:
Hmmmm. This is making me wonder. I have a similar diagnosis: IDC, grade 1, stage 1, ER/PR+ HER2-, but multifocal (1.3 and 1.4cm). No oncotype testing. I'm on AC. I'm 33 and was told that due to my age there would be no question that I would be given all available treatments. I also chose a bi-lat. I went extreme, but this is what I wanted to do. D. Dx 1/2008, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/35 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
kimbly Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 186 |
Apr 26, 2008 01:08 pm
kimbly wrote:
How did you use that Adjuvant Online website?? are you a healthcare professional just curious as I had never heard of it before. Dx 11/21/2007, IDC, 1cm, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
diamondmaha
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 1 |
Apr 26, 2008 02:29 pm
diamondmahala wrote:
Howdy everyone! My first visit here. I had lumpectomy w/clear margins and snb = neg 2 weeks ago. IDC Stage 1, Grade 1, .7cm, her2/-, ER+/PR+. Next week I consult w/ medical onco, the follow week w/ radiation onco. Surgeon said 6 weeks radiation and hormone blocker. I am almost 50 and postmenopausal w/ fibromyalgia. Very concerned about effects on fibro from radiation and hormone blockers. Any info would be greatly appreciated. I don't want a fibro flare-up from treatment for bc and not be able to stay on treatment schedule. My goal is finish treatment by 50th birthday in July. Thank you and God Bless, |
|
swimangel72
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 413 |
Apr 26, 2008 02:41 pm, edited Apr 26, 2008 02:41 PM
by swimangel72
swimangel72 wrote:
Hi Diamond - sorry you have to join us here, but welcome anyway. Your diagnosis is similar to mine, except I ended up being Her2+ thus I needed Herceptin and chemo. However, prior to this knowledge, I was certain I only needed hormone blocker (no radiation necessary since I had a mastectomy).......but my oncologist told me I would have to take Arimidex orally once-a-day for five YEARS. So even if you do finish your rads by July - since you're ER+, you may end up on hormone blockers for a long time. Best thing is to talk to an oncologist and get as much information as you can. Good luck and God bless you too! Dx 2/5/2008, IDC, <1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/7 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2+ |
|
otter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 1863 |
Apr 26, 2008 02:57 pm
otter wrote:
kimbly, the AdjuvantOnline website address is: http://www.AdjuvantOnline.com. Yes, it is supposed to be restricted to health professionals, and I can honestly claim that title (although I am not an M.D.). I had no trouble registering and logging in under my professional name and address. I've heard other people were able to sort of "sneak in," althought the site discourages non-physicians from accessing the information. I guess they're worried we would not know what to do with it. otter Dx 1/14/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
ICanDoThis Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 235 |
Apr 27, 2008 01:00 am
ICanDoThis wrote:
Same stage and grade. 1.5 cm tumor. ER/PR+ Her - Well, the nurse who runs the tumor board told me before my surgery that "all their ladies" with more than a 1cm. tumor have chemo, but when the docs got my path, they all said no chemo. I got a second opinion, and got the same answer. Are you pre- or post-menopausal? I am almost 60, and 3 years post-menopause. |
|
Coltsneck Joined: May 2006 Posts: 244 |
Apr 27, 2008 10:50 am
Coltsneck wrote:
I was diagnosed in May 2006 with IDC. Had lumpectomy, 4 cycles of chemo, 33 rads treatements, and now Arimidex for at least 5 years. My tumor was 1.3 cm and I was grade 3, my Oncotype was 15. Both oncs recommended chemo. Then my case was presented at the hospital's breast cancer board which was attended by oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and surgeons. The recommendation was the same. As much as I dreaded going for chemo, I felt it was the right thing to do for me because I wanted to make sure that everything was done to eradicate the cancer cells (never can be 100% sure but I didn't want to take any chances). I had chemo in June 2006 and it was tough but it was doable and I think I would make the same decision if I had to go back again. In addition to the medical info, it comes down to a personal decision. You just have to be careful - on this site and with your doctors - because often people are trying to push their own agenda (not from the people who responded to you thus far). What you'll find in this world of cancer is that the answers are sometimes murky and the physicians will often turn to us - the least informed/educated - to make the final decision. By the way, having a new onco may not be a bad thing - what they lack in experience is made up by the fact that they usually have the most recent and state of the art knowledge about cancer treatment. |
|
nikkiannej Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 15 |
Apr 28, 2008 07:45 am
nikkiannej wrote:
Hi Girls, I just got my 2nd opinion this past Saturday on 04-26-08 and the onco says that I do not need chemo. He also said years ago when they did not have that ONCOTYPE DX report that women with 1 cm or more would definitely need chemo. He says that the oncotype dx report is not always accurate. The onco says I need radiation therapy and he already wrote me a prescription for tamoxifen. I wasn't sure if I should take tamoxifen before my radiation therapy. Do any of you girls know if I should take tamoxifen right away before getting radiation therapy. I am going for my 3rd opinion on 05-07-08. Love you all and have a great day, Nikki Dx 2/14/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
nikkiannej Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 15 |
Apr 28, 2008 07:46 am
nikkiannej wrote:
Hi girls, Oops, I am going for my 3rd opinion today, 04-28-06 at 3:30 p.m. and will be going for my 4th opinion on 05-07-08, Wednesday. Nikki Dx 2/14/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
Jaydee Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 41 |
Apr 28, 2008 09:53 am
Jaydee wrote:
Hi nikkianne - Felt I had to chip in here as my diagnosis was almost identical to yours, only difference being that my Her 2 was 2+ which is borderline. I was told that wlth a low grade, I was grade 1 and no vascular or node involvement I was considered low risk. I was treated with Lumpectomy, rads and Tamoxifen which I commenced immediately, even before rads. I queried my treatment mainly because of views I read on this site that I should automatically have Herceptin because of the HER2 factor and was told that with my particular cancer there was absolutely no advantage, quite the reverse, to taking Herceptin. There are many side effects as someone already said to taking many of the chemo drugs. I was told that Herceptin was there if I am unlucky and require it but that it should not be given unless necessary. I tend to keep off the Her2 site quite a bit now as I am both afraid of upsetting myself and others! Best wishes |
|
otter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 1863 |
Apr 28, 2008 11:12 am
otter wrote:
Nikki, it's good to hear that you might not need chemo after all! I was hoping that was the case. Now, I hope your other consulting docs don't disagree and and make things more confusing. If your oncologist did not make it clear that you should start taking the Tamoxifen now, or wait awhile, you should call to check on that. Sometimes there are good reasons to delay treatments, and I don't know if that applies to Tamoxifen with radiation therapy. otter Dx 1/14/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR-, HER2- |
|
jpann39 Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 2592 |
Apr 28, 2008 12:21 pm
jpann39 wrote:
Nikki, My med oncologist had me start tamoxifen at my first appt with him once we had the er/pr results back.... I was about 4 wks into rads when everyone freaked out.......they said that the tamox can cause severe burn issues and the rad oncologist was furious that no one had caught that I was taking it as it was in my file right on the top of my medication list.....I didnt have issues with burns at all so was lucky in that respect... I would suggest you ask your rad oncologist what he prefers if you will be starting soon....if not they had my friend that it until the week before rads then stop during rads... I know this is all so very confusing!!!! Jule 'Life may not be the party we hoped for...but while we're here we might as well dance!!!!"
|
|
nikkiannej Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 15 |
Apr 28, 2008 07:37 pm
nikkiannej wrote:
Hi Girls Today I went for my 3rd opinion, the onco recommends me chemo treatment because of the size of my tumor which is 1.8 cm and that I am 43 yrs old and that I can handle it. This onco said getting chemo treatment will bring down the recurrence of the cancer by 5%, down 2% more than radiation and hormone therapy.?????????? (I don't think I understood her) Today I didn't tell the onco that I was planning to get treatment from her. Anyway she took samples of my blood to be set to the the lab which I forgot to ask her why. The onco is sending me to the radiology to get a whole body bone spec and wants me to get a CT scan of the chest and abd/pelvis. She says I will be getting chemo treatment (4 times) and will be getting TC which is Taxotex & Cytoxan every 3 weeks. After chemo, I will be getting radiation treatment 5 times a week for 5/6 weeks and will be on hormone therapy tamoxifen. My first onco recommends chemo treatment. My second onco recommends me NO chemo and my third onco recommends me chemo, so that is 1 no chemo and 2 chemo. I will be seeing another onco next Wednesday, May 7th for my 4th and final opinion. I should be able to make up my mind to do chemo or not. Thank you for all your help and your comments. Nikki Dx 2/14/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 1, 0/2 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
jpann39 Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 2592 |
Apr 28, 2008 07:47 pm
jpann39 wrote:
Wow Nikki I was really hoping they would be more on the same page with each other...Im kind of nervous that the 4th opinion is going to be NO chemo and you will have to basically flip a coin.....not like that isnt whats going on anyway, but they are suppose to be the ones that know what they are doing and are suppose to be helping you.....not confusing you more!!!!!!! Im thinking its the age thing that is leading them.... 'Life may not be the party we hoped for...but while we're here we might as well dance!!!!"
|
|
wishiwere Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 1460 |
Apr 28, 2008 08:26 pm
wishiwere wrote:
I know there are many voices to hear and listen or not to. My choice after having Stage 1, grade 2, 1.7cm IDC/DCIS and another 1 cm ILC/LCIS was to do chemo and hormones. The choice of course was mine, and my onco was 11 which was low, but I'm in a trial and was randomized to do the chemo. I could have opted out of the chemo, but b/c of the combined sizes (which measured 2.7 cm) and the grade 2 and the type being both and other factors, we did opt for the chemo. I do wish we had done TC rather than A/C, but thats hind sight before I learned more on this site and other of the side effects of Adriamycin. It's a personal decision and one not easily made. You must be totally at peace with your decision after educating yourself on everything you can. Only then can you go on to treatment and follow your heart and mind. I wish you all that, peace and knowledge! We'll be here too, to help you through as chemo and rads are doable as all will tell you. Good Luck and prayers in your decision and tx! wishiwere
Dx 9/21/2007, ILC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/4 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
Kestrel Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 14 |
Apr 28, 2008 10:01 pm, edited May 1, 2008 06:29 AM
by Kestrel
Kestrel wrote:
This Post was deleted by Kestrel.
|
|
nikkiannej Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 15 |
Apr 29, 2008 07:22 am, edited Apr 29, 2008 07:25 AM
by nikkiannej
nikkiannej wrote:
This Post was deleted by nikkiannej.
|
|
amberyba Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 225 |
Apr 29, 2008 07:38 am
amberyba wrote:
hi Nikkiannej, I have almost identical IDC, 1.5cm, erpr+, 0/3nodes, her2-,onco-7, age 43, diagnosed 2-2008 no chemo 4 me...your scored in the low range as well...0-17...sounds like the medical oncologist in your area are aggressive treaters.... it is your body and your decision...no doctor can make you take chemo. my sisters oncologist was very pushy with hormonal therapy...she tried and then due to side effects refused...the doc was unhappy...but he couldn't force her... pray about it and put it in the LORD's Hand...I will pray too! Lord, Help Nikkiannnej to know what to do...give her peace and reassurance...put her in capable doctors hands who are wise, experienced and understanding. Thank You for Nikkiannej...Bless her in ways she never imagined. Jesus is Lord, Amen Best! Amber Amber Almond
Dx 2/2008, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/3 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
|
amberyba Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 225 |
Apr 29, 2008 07:38 am, edited Apr 29, 2008 07:39 AM
by amberyba
amberyba wrote:
This Post was deleted by amberyba.
|
|
ICanDoThis Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 235 |
Apr 29, 2008 09:19 am
ICanDoThis wrote:
Nikkiannej Wow, confusion! Have you considered - you probably have a good 40 years to go when this breast cancer is successfully treated. ER+ breast cancers always have a chance of recurrence, so there is something to be said for hitting it out of the ballpark on the first pass. I hate saying this, because I didn't want, and didn't get chemo, but it's worth considering. One thing you may want to consider, whether or not you go for chemo, is to look into the possibility of partial breast irradiation. That would be 1 week of treatments, rather than 5, and would get you back to your life sooner. Here's a link to the most recent research, and the ladies on the radiation therapy topic have been talking a lot about short term options. http://www.breastcancer.org/treatment/radiation/new_research/20080319.jsp It probably doesn't seem like it, but this will all be over fairly soon. I was diagnosed the first week of January, made the best choices I could, and finished radiation a week ago. Hang in there, sweetie. |
|
Lynne Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 564 |
May 13, 2008 02:18 am
Lynne wrote:
Nikki, I was diagnosed at 43 also, 3 years ago this month. My oncologist is also young and suggested chemo too. My tumor 1.5cm, er and pr+, grade 2, her2-, no lymph node involvement, Stage I, pretty close to what yours is. My surgeon suggested I take the Oncotype DX test. He said the only reason they had suggested chemo was because I was premenopausal and any tumor over 1cm, they suggest chemo. My Oncotype DX score was 12. 92% chance cancer would not come back. Chemo would have brought it up only 3%, to 95%. I decided then and there that I would not have chemo. I had 6 weeks of radiation and I decided to have a total hysterectomy (ovaries,everything) after my radiation, to get rid of those estrogen ovaries (I already have 4 kids) and awful heavy periods. 2 weeks post surgery I started on Arimidex. I switched to Femara after a year, because of all the joint pain. About 9 months later I switched back to Arimidex, because my feet killed me so much on Femara, I had a hard time walking. I have about a month left on Arimidex, and then I'm trying Tamoxifen. If my pains do not get better, I'm getting off everything. I've a couple of breaks from all of the meds, and the pain, hot flashes, etc. all go away. I'm just sick of feeling 90! Good luck in you decision! Lynne Carpe Diem-Live for Today
Dx 5/26/2005, IDC, 1cm, Stage I, Grade 2, 0/1 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2- |
© 2008 Breastcancer.org. All rights reserved.