Log in to post a reply
Oct 25, 2020 07:24AM
Beesie
wrote:
Jpk, your stats are still not visible on your signature line.
I don't have a copy of an Oncotype report for a 17 score, but I do have the TAILORx study, on which the current Oncotype recurrence risks (for node negative) are based.
Here's a chart from the Appendix of the report; I've highlighted a 17 score. I included both the 'aged 50 and under' graph, and the 'over age 50' graph because I don't know how old you are.

What this is saying is that at an Oncotype 17 score, someone who takes endocrine therapy will have a 9-year risk of metastatic recurrence just below 5%. Since endocrine therapy reduces metastatic risk by about 1/3rd, this means that without endocrine therapy, 9-year metastatic risk will be approx. 7%. What could change this, either increasing or decreasing the risk, is if something about the patient or her diagnosis is way off the average, i.e. a tumor that is significantly larger or smaller than average (average tumor size in TAILORx was ~1.75cm), if the grade of the cancer was higher or lower (the average in TAILORx was grade 2), and if the patient is significantly younger than the average (in the '50 and under' cohort) or significantly older than average (in the 'over 50' cohort). The Oncotype report that patients receive don't reflect any of these differences - everyone with a 17 score will receive the same recurrence information - but Oncotype provide to MOs a separate computer model that allows the MO to recalculate the risk by applying these factors (age, tumor size, tumor grade, and whether the patient will be taking an AI or Tamoxifen) against patient's specific Oncotype score. This is the Oncotype RSPC model (Recurrence Score Pathology Clinical).
In any case, unless your diagnosis or age is way off the average, it appears that the extra metastatic risk that you face by not taking endocrine therapy is in the range of 2.5%. For many patients, trying endocrine therapy is worth it for that additional risk reduction benefit, but for other patients it's not.
Jpk, since you said that "The medical team cannot or will not understand my decision" I would suggest that you ask them for their take on the information I provided. I'm pulling it from the TAILORx report; it would be interesting to see what your doctors tell you about how much additional risk you are exposed to by not taking endocrine therapy.
“No power so effectually robs the mind of all its powers of acting and reasoning as fear.” Edmund Burke