Log in to post a reply
Aug 16, 2011 07:28AM
Aug 16, 2011 07:30AM
If you go with a lumpectomy, you will pretty much have to have radiation to zap any cells that are left. Otherwise you may be in this same boat a couple of years from now. They say that a lumpectomy plus rads = mastectomy as far as survival. However, I was told that a lumpectomy had a 8-14% recurrence chance in the same side, while a mastectomy had a 3-5% chance recurrence.
I am one of those who was totally eligible for a lumpectomy and opted for a total mastectomy to avoid the radiation. I did not want to put my body through more after chemo than I had to. And having four kids, going for radiation every day for 5 weeks seemed daunting.
It's a personal choice. Also, if you have radiation, you can never have it there again, in that same side.
It all depends on how important your breast is to you. I understand - we're young (I was 41 last yr on my diagnosis). But for me, I'd already breastfed my four kids - having it off was not a big deal to me. My breast surgeon argued with me, but I made my choice and have not regretted it for one single day. But for other women, it would be extremely traumatic to have to have a mastectomy when they could have had a lumpectomy.
Just be aware that if you have the lumpectomy, you will need to have radiation. Not to do so could have dire consequences.
"But when he saw the wind, he was afraid and, beginning to sink, cried out, “Lord, save me!” Immediately Jesus reached out his hand and caught him. “You of little faith,” he said, “why did you doubt?” Matt. 14:28
6/12/2010, IDC, 1cm, Stage IIA, Grade 2, 2/12 nodes, ER+/PR+, HER2-