Apr 22, 2011 09:58AM nash wrote:
I was 38 at diagnosis and was also surprised, since it's more common in post-meno women.
Posted on: Apr 21, 2011 07:46PM
LauraK wrote:
Hi everybody,
I just got diagnosed with ILC. I am only 31 and was just wondering if there are any other people this young with the same diagnosis. I understood ILC was much more common in older age groups..
Regards, Laura
Log in to post a replyPosts 1 - 30 (123 total)
Apr 22, 2011 09:58AM nash wrote:
I was 38 at diagnosis and was also surprised, since it's more common in post-meno women.
Apr 22, 2011 10:09AM sgreenarch wrote:
Hi. I was 49 at dx and premnopausal. Not sure if this is still considered young:)!
Apr 22, 2011 10:37AM nowords wrote:
I was 50 and not in menopause. I was told that the 10 cm plus tumor (that 10 mammograms missed) was growing for at least 10 years.
Apr 22, 2011 01:05PM roseamy wrote:
Hi,
I am lobular and ductal I was 40 at dx ( misdx at 36).
Apr 23, 2011 08:53AM LauraK wrote:
Thank you for your answers! It seems that I am not completely alone. (Although still the youngest I have been able to find:) )
Apr 23, 2011 01:05PM sweetbean wrote:
I'm 37 - not quite as young as you, though! Lobular and ductal. Blech!
Apr 23, 2011 05:20PM Jalsmama55 wrote:
I'm 37 and pleomorphic lobular with ductal features, you're definitely not alone doll :)
Apr 27, 2011 09:12PM elmcity69 wrote:
39 at dx, ILC....
Apr 30, 2011 04:31PM Nicoleb wrote:
I was 36, almost 37, when dx'd w ith ILC. I guess that puts me in the "younger" category. :)
Apr 30, 2011 04:35PM cathmg wrote:
Hi Laura,
I was 43 and premen when diagnosed...4 cm tumor that I'm sure had been growing for awhile...
Apr 30, 2011 09:29PM JennyB wrote:
I was 39...
hugs,
Jenny
May 1, 2011 03:19PM MandaLynn wrote:
I was 44 at diagnosis. It's been 2.5 yrs now. Went for bilateral mx, have had major doubts about that, but they're gone now, so I'm moving on. Going to have diep in nov (I've had expanders in this whole time- must be a record). I'm on the hormone shots (zoladex). Getting tiredoif the monthly visit. I forget every time and have to scramble to get the appt (shots are best every 28 days). I'm holding offln ooph because my hot flashes are minimal now and I've got this belief that they'll be worse without my ovaries (although the shots shut them down anyway). Does anyone know if it's different? I think I'll list that question under hormonal board.
Believe it or not, even after the cancer dx, my biggest problem right now is losing weight. You know- all that info that says under 25 BMI is least reoccurrence. Oh, sh*t.
Amanda
Jul 10, 2011 04:46PM CorinneM1 wrote:
I am 39 and was diagnosed in May of this year. I was also told that our ILC is more common in women in their 60s and that I was/am considered young for ILC.
I was also told that I probably had it at least 3 years. I am grateful and thankful for the latest technology and treatments as early detection saved my life. They were able to find 3 tumors, grade 1 stage 1, despite ILC being a "sneaky" cancer.
Jul 10, 2011 11:02PM JennyB wrote:
I was 38 when I felt the lump; 39 when dxed.
jenny
Jul 11, 2011 02:19PM ValerieF wrote:
I was 39, and I have a friend who was 28. It is unusual--on the Young Survival Coalition website, only about 3.5% of the young women diagnosed with breast cancer had ILC.
Jul 11, 2011 02:20PM elmcity69 wrote:
39 ....
Jul 11, 2011 02:47PM cd1234 wrote:
I was 37 when I was diagnosed.
Jul 12, 2011 05:32PM - edited Jul 12, 2011 05:32PM by sweetbean
Aug 26, 2011 02:19PM ValerieF wrote:
Aug 26, 2011 03:27PM snicklefritz wrote:
I was 44. Don't know of any family history. I did go to get tested for the gene which was negative. I did this for my daughter so she could use as much info from me to help her in future.
Aug 26, 2011 08:29PM CorinneM1 wrote:
Valerie, did you get tested with your family history?
Aug 27, 2011 08:22AM Robyn_S wrote:
I was premenopausal and diagnosed at 46 with a 8.7cm tumor. As it was a grade 1 and slow growing it could have been there for 10 years. I have finished chemo and will have 25 rads before 5 years of tamoxifen. The gift that just keeps on giving!!
Aug 27, 2011 08:28AM odie16 wrote:
4o at dx 2-3 cm ..no family hx....premenopausal .
Sep 2, 2011 11:53AM CML0310 wrote:
I was 41 at diagnosis- didn't feel anything mamogram/ultrasound detected it no family history
Sep 2, 2011 01:30PM CynLyn wrote:
Yes, and I was 28 when I was diagnosed. I am now 29 years old. Have a family history of breast cancer and test positive for BRAC1 gene. Had a right modified mesectomy, 5+ cm tumor. Dr's say that I had the tumor for maybe 7 years! Went through very aggressive chemo and 31 radiation treatments. I just finished treatments in late July, I am having long term side effects from chemo, neuropathy in both hands and both feet, crushing bone pain. I hope it gets better with time. I really hope that I didn't pass this gene to my daughter, she is only 23 months right now. :(
Sep 4, 2011 10:39PM Katarina wrote:
49....
Sep 4, 2011 11:40PM Seashellie wrote:
46 for me. Post-menopausal (early menopause!) I was on bioidentical hormones that made my breasts sensitive and prompted me to do a really good self exam where I found the lump just before my yearly mammogram - and it wasn't seen on the mammo. but the ultrasound picked it up. Grandma had BC but I tested negative for BRCA.
Sep 5, 2011 10:22AM mary625 wrote:
49 for me.... Pre-menopausal.
Sep 9, 2011 09:19PM Mela3 wrote:
Hi ladies, I was 47 at Dx-I was Premenapausal but haven't had a period since the third treatment with AC-in October 2010. Guess that's that. My onc said when you're in your upper 40's it often just speeds up the inevitable but if your in your 30's everything can go back to normal after treatment.