Topic: Bone Mets Thread

Jul 6, 2021 05:10AM JoynerL wrote:

jsniffs, I believe that some with oligometastasis have started with stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) in an effort to wipe out the cancer entirely while it is so limited in scope and location. You're fortunate to perhaps have that option, in addition to whatever other approach(es) your oncs recommend. Good luck!

I had SBRT last year to address a worrisome periclavicular node, and it appears so far to have eliminated that problem.

Jul 6, 2021 09:51AM elenas401 wrote:

This sounds promising. They are starting trials on solid tumors including breast cancer in different countries, hopefully soon in the US. They are using it on skin cancer and mets at Sloan Kettering Cancer in NYC. 100 % of tumors responded with 100% having a complete response.

Jul 6, 2021 09:46PM star2017 wrote:

Hi Jsniffs, I just noticed that like me you were diagnosed while pregnant. I hope you and your family are doing well, though I'm sorry that you're back here like me.

I had my last radiation treatment today (15/15). I've already started fulvestrant. After a break and some bloodwork, I'll be starting Abemaciclib and Xgeva. Leg pain is pretty much gone (tho the couple days after my fulvestrant shot, there was a bit of an ache down my leg, not near the injection site). I'm still taking it easy and avoiding putting weight on my leg, but I do feel I need to figure out what kind of exercise I can do. I'm not a super-active person, but I can feel that this past month or two of reduced activity hasn't been good for me. I want to figure out what sort of exercises I can do safely.

Jul 7, 2021 11:09AM buttonsmachine wrote:

star, regarding the ache down you leg after the Faslodex injection - it is possible for the nurses to hit your sciatic nerve if they do the injection in the wrong location, which can cause that kind of pain. I had that happen once. Every time I put weight on that leg I had pain going down my leg, and it took a month or two for my sciatic nerve to heal. Fortunately it did heal! After that I actually started marking the good/correct area to inject with a sharpie, as an extra measure of protection against nurses who don't know the best location. (Although again, most nurses do know.)

I don't say that to scare you, but rather just to make you aware that it can be important to guide some nurses with the Faslodex injection. Most nurses at my center are good at it, but I think a few were not as experienced with it, and according to my MO there's a bit of a learning curve with giving that shot. I also found that it helps to just ask for whoever is best/most experienced at giving it.

Just a few tips I learned while on Faslodex, in case it helps!

Jul 7, 2021 09:10PM star2017 wrote:

buttonsmachine, Thank you! The nurses themselves always ask about how it feels and warned me about the nerve issue, so they are pretty careful. The ache was the same sort of dull ache toward the front of the thigh that the metastasis caused (before the radiation). I wonder if it's either just weakness in the bone after radiation or, what I think is more likely, some sort of temporary inflamation caused by the fulvestrant. The pain was gone after a couple days. I'll definitely mention it to the MO and the orthopedic oncologist.

Jul 7, 2021 10:51PM star2017 wrote:

I had a bone biopsy after my MRI and CT scans showed concerning imaging. I was not under general anesthesia. Rather, I was sedated in the twilight state. I was mostly awake but dozed a little during and immediately after the procedure. The procedure was not a problem. No real pain beyond the numbing shot. My bone mets was causing me pain, and after the procedure I didn't notice more pain than before.

Jul 8, 2021 12:28AM Snow-drop wrote:

forevermom, I diagnosed de novo as well, same story as yours. No bone biopsy for me though, since scan, bone scan and mri confirmed those lesions are Mets. See this thread: https://community.breastcancer.org/forum/8/topics/876918?page=28#idx_811

Jul 8, 2021 03:18AM SondraF wrote:

de novo as well, but no bone biopsy. Confirmed through CT, MRI and bone scan. However, I had one sacral lesion causing serious pain so I guess that was pretty obvious what was going on. Not sure why they don't bone biopsy here (probably cost) for de novo, though I imagine if I didn't respond to hormone therapy that they would have done it then.

Two spots isnt a bad deal though - you should join us on the de novo thread as there are some doctors who are challenging the conventional thinking around oliogo treatment (which you are).

Jul 8, 2021 05:30AM star2017 wrote:

For me they needed to biopsy to confirm it was breast cancer (and not some new cancer) and that it had the same characteristics regarding estrogen, progesterone, and her2 as the primary. How do they develop the treatment plan without the biopsy?

Jul 8, 2021 08:31PM Forevermom10 wrote:

Thank you everyone for your responses . I really am nervous but know that I’m in good hands. I hope that I can continue with my current treatment as I am able to tolerate it so far. Next appt is with radiologist to talk about zapping the two spots.

Today I spent most of the dat crying. In a normal summer, i would be decorating my deck or planning a little summer getaway. I am mourning my carefree future. I hope that one day it wont be this hard....

Blessings and healing to everyone. X

Jul 8, 2021 09:02PM SF-Cakes wrote:

Forevermom, I had to have a biopsy to confirm my spinal met, the MRI was "inconclusive but cannot rule out metastasis". And similarly, this was shortly after being diagnosed stage 2b, I was in shock. The biopsy went well, I was awake but not anxious due to IV meds, and the doctor did hit a nerve at one point - about 2 seconds of pain, but no other pain and no problems afterwards. Other than getting the phone call from my doctor confirming it was a met...that was much more painful.

I cried so much at first, just could not believe it was happening so fast. I'm now about six months out from the MBC diagnosis, and my life is surprisingly relatively like it was before. I'm much more tired due to the meds, but I'm still working and doing yard work (just not for hours at a time like I used to). I know this can change at any time, and I do live my life in three-month chunks, from one scan to the next. Really hope your biopsy goes well and I'm sorry you're here, and glad you found this site - the people here have helped keep me sane many times in the past six months!

Jul 12, 2021 02:24PM - edited Jul 12, 2021 02:41PM by NicoleRod

Well tomorrow is the PET and MRI of Liver but the MRI of C spine hit the My chart not good...looks like Afinitor failed...

TECHNIQUE: Multiplanar, multisequence MR imaging of the cervical spine was

performed before and after the intravenous injection of 5 cc of Gadavist.

FINDINGS: There is progressive signal abnormality centered in the spinous

process of C7, with more focal STIR hyperintensity that measures up to 8 mm

AP. The findings are most consistent with progressive tumor in this region.

There is new abnormal signal with enhancement involving the articular facet

and pedicle of C7 on the left. No significant epidural tumor is identified.

There is multilevel degenerative cervical spondylosis, as before. The

cervical spinal cord is normal in caliber and signal intensity.

There is a lesion in the T2 vertebral body which will be discussed on the

concurrent thoracic spine MRI report.

IMPRESSION:

Disease progression, with interval enlargement of the C7

spinous process lesion and a new lesion involving the articular facet and

pedicle of C7 on the left.

THIS is the T- spine...what is that t9 all about????!!!!!! I am really upset...

COMPARISON: Prior thoracic spine MRI 07/09/2021

TECHNIQUE: Multiplanar, multisequence MR imaging of the thoracic spine was

performed before and after the intravenous injection of 5 cc of Gadavist.

FINDINGS: New from the prior MRI examination, there is abnormal STIR

hyperintensity and enhancement involving virtually entirety of the T3

vertebral body which is consistent with progressive disease. There is

minimal extraosseous extension, with epidural tumor ventrally that measures

up to approximately 2 mm in thickness. There is no associated significant

canal stenosis or cord compression.

No additional worrisome thoracic lesions are identified. There is a small

hemangioma involving the dorsal aspect of the T9 vertebral body, as before.

The spinal canal is widely patent. There is prominence of the central canal

of the thoracic spinal cord, without focal intramedullary lesion. There are

hepatic lesions that are partially imaged and incompletely evaluated.

IMPRESSION:

There is a new metastatic focus replacing majority of the T3

vertebral body. There is early canal compromise with minimal tumor

extension into the ventral epidural space. The spinal canal remains patent.

Jul 12, 2021 02:51PM candy-678 wrote:

Nicole- I posted to you on the Liver Thread. Again, I hate this for you.

I do wonder how my bone mets are. I have a CT of chest and MRI of abdomen and pelvis as my scans. The CT chest will document "unchanged sclerotic areas seen in bone window". So, unchanged where they can see, but how about areas not visualized on these scans?? Cervical spine--- I have C2 mets, and my pubic bone where I have mets. So I could have progression of bone along with my small progression of my liver mets. Who knows.....

Jul 12, 2021 06:24PM NicoleRod wrote:

Tink...I had radiation to the sacrum..and that is what is confusing me..the report looks like progression in sacrum which would mean the rads didn't work...but I have a ton of relief there??? well my MO just called...she thinks on the report where it mentions T2 might be a mistake and its just the T3 (that I had , and is worse) she said the sacrum could look bigger bc it was radiated and be dead. She is going to double check with the RO.

Jul 12, 2021 07:39PM - edited Jul 12, 2021 07:41PM by Snow-drop

Nicole, I just wanted to say that my spine mri 4 months after radiation showed progression in new areas + radiated tumors got bigger + 2 lesions were seen in epidural space as big as 8mm. RO believed that those are “inflammation" and flaring (I guess). Thank god both my MO and RO were highly experienced so they didn't freak out like neuro oncologist (assistant professor tittle) did. I had to do mri every 6 weeks then 8 weeks then 3 months, so fed up with them, until things got stable, next mri in 6 months. Those nasty tumors get to be stable sooner or later (((hugs)))