Can we have a forum for "older" people with bc?
Comments
-
In case I don't log on, just wanted to wish you guys a Happy Mother's Day.
0 -
Normal day, let me be aware of the treasure you are. Let me learn from you, love you, and bless you before you depart.
Mary Jean Irion
0 -
Carole - you are right. I am very close to each child and one-on-one have a great time with them. And when all five of them get together, spouses included,we all have such a good time, my face gets sore from laughing so much. It is just their insatiable need to criticize each other that drives me crazy. It's like they need to prove they are the "best" child. As far as I am concerned, it is kind of like the Bible verse that says "Take the plank out of your own eye before you worry about the splinter in someone else's." They all have their own issues to deal with, but I love each of them whole heartedly. If each of them would just concentrate on themselves and their own families, I would have the perfect family.
I am going out for lunch today at the Cheesecake Factory with an old friend. Both of our girls, who have been best friends since middle school have both moved to GA. They are each about 40 minutes from the Mall of GA, in opposite directions. Like me, Jo is here this week because of her grandson's birthday. So, we are meeting there. We looked at possibly going to the movies at the mall, but there is nothing playing there that meets our tastes, so we will eat, then walk around the mall for a while. Other than dinner on Michael's birthday, and trips to the grocery store or Walmart, it will be the only social contact I will have this trip. I head home next Wed.
Sending good thoughts to Di, Puffin, Sandra et all. Have a wonderful Mothers Day.
Anne
0 -
HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY gals!
0 -
The Tao Te Ching says, When I let go of what I am, I become what
I might be. When I let go of what I have, I receive what I need.
Have you ever struggled to find work or love, only to find them
after you have given up? This is the paradox of letting go.
Let go, in order to achieve. Letting go is God's law.Mary Manin Morrissey
0 -
Beautiful sunny morning here. I think our temps have risen and hopefully will stay nicer. Back to wearing Capri's . Still going daily to the Manor to sit with Sally. Time to take her some more cookies too. I don't take too many at a time since she is known to over-indulge and not eat her meals. No wonder I like her, she has a couple of my bad habits.
Anne, love just often over-powers a lot of the negatives we are handed in life. It is not a bad thing. As long as we are aware of the negatives and are able to find some ( it isn't required that it be a huge amt. ) general acceptance, then we can build easily on the more genuinely positive things. I have so disliked some of my children's negatives and felt them a burden -- but the if they are that, the burden isn't mine but theirs. So if they never see those items that way, so be it. I still want to have a relationship with them not defined by the love I feel for them.
We have a place ( you can buy Cheesecakes ) called Say Cheesecake. I think the man has been there now for 5 or so years. The cakes are really good, but a bit on the pricey side. I have to be REALLY feeling carefree to buy a whole cake. Usually only come home with one or two pieces if I go at all. I'm glad he is there because I really do love cheesecake but even he does not make the old-fashioned kind which I sorely miss. Folks used to get it at the corner bakeries in St. Louis, Missouri. In those days 30's - 40's there were bakeries on nearly every street corner. They had a favorite one and any time they had to go to the city ( not too often ) they would get a cheesecake. The pieces sliced were small because it had to last as long as possible. Hard to describe because in those days there was 'actual' cake ( like the regular cakes we bake ) and the filling ( cheese part ) did not have the consistency that we have now which is a whole lot creamier. It was a lot more coarse, and the flavor was out of this world. I have to assume it must have been harder to bake or took a lot of mixing/other handling because that cheesecake to me was so superior to what passes for cheesecake now. Still, I love it enough to eat it and guess I won't ever give it up -- but I do miss the REALLY good, to me almost perfect cheesecake of my childhood.
Off and running. I'll see you all later.
Jackie
0 -
Happy Mother's Day to all of you wonderful ladies! I probably won't get on tomorrow. We are driving up to the homefront....about 2 1/2 hours to decorate Mom's grave for both Mother's Day and Memorial Day. Then we are coming home through Rock Island and eating the Mother's Day Buffet at Jumer's. My son usually never comes home for Mother's Day so I've tried to find a different tradition for the day.
I got a great Mother's Day present in the mail today from Susan G. Komen. It was the official letter saying that my mammogram was normal! Who could ask for more????
Hugs to all of you as you celebrate the important role you play in your families!
0 -
Happy Mother's Day to you Rita and that letter is not only a fantastic gift but proof that you are needed in this world. May you never get a letter that says anything different from Susan Komen's letter this time.
I will be going to see Sally tomorrow. Dh is working so I will have a quiet day -- partially alone, but that is ok with me. Dh gets off early enough. Then we will figure out something to do -- like have an ice-cream supper and pop-corn later with a movie.
Jackie
0 -
And Happy Mother's Day all! I already got a great present! I CAN HEAR OUT OF MY LEFT EAR!!! I still have to wear my hearing aids, but my PC must have been right! She said that bad infection, Bronchitis & Asthma probably caused me to lose more hearing in that ear... but it must be BETTER! I'm still going to the ENT Monday... Then on the 18th for another hearing test and maybe new hearing aids... They are over 5 years old. I hope if I need new ones, they will serve me as well as these have...
Congratulations Rita! Great news!
Anne.... good luck with keeping the kids untangled! Sometimes you probably feel like they are little kids again! After my 2 Daughter's grew up, they became "best friends"... In fact the older one thinks her Sister is her own little kid.... I think.... Ha!
So our oldest one is coming out on the 14th with our 2 Grand-sons....! Trying to get the house and the yard ready! I KNOW we will be busy with them!
AND our kitchen sink plumbing WORKS!!!! Daughter's friend came by when I was having a frustrating bad day... about the pipes, and why they were leaking, and us trying to put them back together... leakless! I just cried when I saw him....
Now they are WORKING! Sometimes things just fall into place! Like miracles.... when you need them the most!
0 -
Finding even after all these years, almost 13, Mothers Day is one of the difficult holidays for me. Amy, my daughter who passed from BC at 33, was always the one of my 3 who took the time to send a card, flowers or a gift! The other two I wait to see if they will remember to call. Same for birthdays and Christmas. Don't know if it will ever get easier!
Hope you all have an enjoyable Mothers Day. We are actually supposed to get some sun.
0 -
Morning Bonnets! Oh don't go payin' any attention to those brats.... I mean kids. I don't know what happens to some people when they grow up, but their heads just get screwed on back-wards.... They start thinking only about themselves...
You are not alone... So many Mom's are wishing the same thing today.... Hopefully these same "kids" won't know the heart-break their own Mom's feel.
I have an idea! YOU call THEM! Tell THEM Happy Mother's Day! Even if they aren't a Mother, they made YOU a Mother! Hah! Just act like you are happy, and proud they are in your life.... if even not as much as you would like!
Guess we showed THEM! Anyway, happy Mother's day gals!
0 -
Happy Mother's Day to all the Mothers on this board.
I'm 62 and just completed active BC treatment. I enjoy BCO but as the thread-starter Northstar said, many of the posts are from younger women. I would like to pose a BC-related question to the other 'older' women on this thread:
Did your age impact your treatment decision when facing BC treatment? I often look at the signature lines under posts and so often their treatments (for the same BC stats as mine) are far more involved than mine. For instance, double mastectomies for women who had an in-situ BC or a smaller than 1cm BC with no lymph node involvement.
I realize we each have to reach our own treatment decisions and, at least in the US, we are lucky because most of our insurance companies cover whatever treatments we decide to get. So again, I ask: how, if at all, did your age factor in to your BC treatment decisions? Did you decide to forego chemo or rads because of your age? Did you decide that you didn't need a treatment because BC in older women often (but not always) seems to grow less aggressively or more slowly than in younger women?
I would love to have your input.
Thanks!
Sunnyone
0 -
Sunny.... good question! I was 72 when first diagnosed... and since my cancer was only stage 1, grade 2.... and I had a Lumpectomy with the Mammosite device... I decided I didn't WANT to have chemo... Yes, my age had a lot to do with my decisions... first on not having a mastectomy, nor chemo.... I didn't want to go through all of that, considering my diagnosis... My Onco test was 19.... (Low intermediate)
What does your team say? Mine thought if I didn't want chemo, then it was up to me.... I also had the same diagnosis as you....no nodes involved, AND I'm over 6 years out!

Just go on living without worrying about what MIGHT happen....and have a HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY!
0 -
Good morning Sunnyone22. I'm not a good person to ask but I'm sure others will come on at some point. As a former WAC I had no insurance ( lost it a short time before diagnosis ) and had my treatment through the V.A. I listened to options, but generally deferred to them. So, it ended up being a lot of tx. since at first I had a slow growing lazy tumor --- them upon removal ( lumpectomy ) a second, much larger, aggressive tumor was found which threw me into a way different, much longer tx. plan.
I hope you get lots of answers to your questions. May take a day or so here. I don't celebrate Mother's Day -- another work day for me, but since having cancer which is and has been NED I celebrate everyday with as much devotion to and gratitude for as I can develop. I feel like the Universe showered me with love and care in my darkest days and I respectfully wish to give some back --- and as well to my fellow travelers on the path called life.
Jackie
0 -
Love is the greatest force for good.
- Jonathan Lockwood Huie0 -
Sonnyone- good question. I was 64 when diagnosed. I did everything the Drs wanted, but immediately chose a double mastectomy with no reconstruction. I had had scares in my left breast a few times, so I just didn't want to take any chances. I remember telling that to my breast surgeon the first time I saw him, and he agreed immediately, but told me I had lots of time to decide on reconstruction. Then I found this site and read a lot about reconstruction, which just reinforced my original decision. I don't know for sure, maybe there are lots of good reconstructions, but all I was reading about was the nightmares some people went thru - some needing multiple revisions, and even the ones that had success on the first try reported a great deal of pain going thru the process. Maybe a big part of my decision was the fact that I had lost my husband of 42 years thirteen months before I was diagnosed. I have a very busy life with 5 children and soon to be 8 grandchildren. I knew I would not be dating, much less remarrying. But even earlier, when we would hear of someone having breast cancer, I always said that if that was to happen with me, I would go for the double mastectomy.
One decision my Drs made was to do the chemo before the surgery, which I had not heard of before. But my soon-to-be daughter-in-law's sister is a well respected Dr, (not an oncologist), had vetted my BS and MO and said they were the top of the top in their fields, so to trust what they said. I aM glad I did, because I was stage three, and looking back now, when I have been NED for 3 years, I believe that decision was absolutely the right choice
There are as many different reasons for choosing or refusing a particular treatment as they are women diagnosed with BC. Unfortunately we are forced to make those decisions when almost everycell in our brain is just shouting "I've got cancer, I've got CANCER". I didn't even think of questioning the Drs plan - all I knew was I wanted to live. I believe my age factored in, only in the sense that I did not choose reconstruction. If I haD been younger, married or not, I might have chosen recon. Hope that helps- it's only my humble opinion.
HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY TO ALL, even those whose children are the furry kind.
Anne
0 -
Chevyboy - Thanks for your positive reply - good to hear you're 6 years NED. I agree with your attitude of gratitude and like to think this BC incident just strengthened mine.
I got pretty much the same feedback from my MO as you did. I got a second opinion from the chief MO and he concurred. Both felt the risks wouldn't outweigh the benefits. An added point was that my BC was ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma) which tends to be less responsive to chemo than other types of BC.
Jackie from Centralia - Thanks also for your lovely reply. I understand why you gave over your decisions to the docs - that's what they're paid to do - give us informed advice. Actually, even though my docs left decisions to me, both BS and MO gave me their opinions and I agreed with them, following their advice.
I'm (gratefully) having virtually no side effects from the Aromatase Inhibitor I'm taking for the next (at least) 5 years and I am so grateful not to be reminded every day of BC (which was happening when I went to 28 days of radiation). Time to look forward and be grateful that I live in an age when I have access to such modern medicine and wonderful healthcare professionals.
How about others on this thread: Did your age impact your treatment decision when facing BC treatment?
0 -
I was diagnosed a week after turning 71. I had a lumpectomy and the margins weren't good enough. The re-excision for better margins found a slightly larger more aggressive tumor that was not on the mammogram. At that point, I decided on the mastectomy. The margins on that were good, so I was able to avoid radiation. There was nothing suspicious in the other breast, so I decided only to do the bad side. I never considered reconstruction. Perhaps if would have if I was much younger; I don't know. Currently I'm considering having the other side removed for symmetry. It's difficult to match a sagging bag of marbles with a perky foob and the bra strap crosses a nerve that's acting up. Still it's unnecessary surgery, so I'm not sure I'll do it. I didn't have an oncotype test and was happy that no one thought I needed chemo.
Happy Mother's Day to all.
0 -
Absolutely not Sonny. I've never been one to mark time by my chronological age. I think general health was more relevant for me than years - and I was in the best health of my life at age 67. And then...
I had "only" DCIS, but stage 3 and extremely dense breasts & lots of scares over the years. I opted for BMX, mainly because I didn't want to deal with it ever again (ha ha) and it turned out there were several tumors in both breasts. But margins were good & sentinel nodes were negative. I was ER/PR negative so no other treatment recommended. I opted for expanders during the BMX and reconstruction with Anatomical 410s six months later because I wanted to just continue to pull on my clothes in the morning & run on. I do take the time to brush my teeth but resent even the time to run a comb through my hair and I knew prosthetics would not be a viable option for me Like Anne, I have no intention to date, but knew reconstruction would make my day to day life easier - and it has. Things were great I was almost back where I started (minus nipples) and making lots of travel plans.
Unfortunately the cancer came back at 2 years and it was IDC & HER2+. I had neoadjuvent chemo without a complete response, then ALND surgery, then more chemo w/different poisons, then rads, then herceptin for the remainder of a year. Unfortunately I ended up with truncal lymphadema and my feet are numb with neuropathy from the chemo, but mostly my life is back on track. I've taken two extended trips in 2016 & rented cars, navigated new cities, hiked trails, walked beaches & celebrated sunrises. I am never sorry I chose double mastectomy & reconstruction.
0 -
Sunny I love your user name. I asked the same question of myself over and over during my experience. I had screening mammo 1/2016 and was not told I had cancer until 2/25/16. I began getting angry. I couldn't understand why it was taking so long. It turned out to be invasive Ductal carcinoma but I was also having atypical Ductal hyperplasia in opposite breast. I am 65 and I asked myself what I would do if I was younger. But I realized the only difference to me would have been the recon decision. I wanted both breasts gone but the surgeon I had at the time said no but that he'd probably have to do it later. I wondered why not get it over with now. As things led from one thing to another I wound up going to a doctor who specializes in breast surgery. She agreed to the BMX and I thought about it and wondered if I would feel mutilated or at least very depressed if I didn't at least try for reconstruction. I have a wonderful husband I have been married to since I was 16 and he was 17. I don't think he wanted me to go through the recon but left it up to me. I had the surgery 4/19/16 with recon TEs placed and yes there has been pain and a lot of exhaustion but I would do it again. So far I am not sorry. I knew it would be a battle but I have a lot of support. I love the doctors I have now and trust them. As it turned out I have stage 2A cancer right side clear sentinel node but unexpectedly had atypical cells in lymph node on left side. Pathologists are not sure what's going on so now I am scheduled with a good oncologist and am to expect at least chemo treatments and 5 years treatment for Er+, Pr+, her2- receptors. Oncotype score hasn't come back yet. But to answer your question the only difference related to age for me is I would make the same decision if I had the same options available
Happy Mothers Day to all my BCO sisters. I love you all and will forever be grateful to you for sharing your experiences with the rest of us
Sharon
0 -
I was 67 when I was dx'ed. Age affected my reconstruction choice. I chose immediate recon with implants because I wanted to recover as soon as possible and get back to playing golf and being active. If I had been younger, I probably would have chosen DIEP, which was an option for me. The recovery is longer because of the incision for removing the tissue that is relocated. It never once occurred to me not to have reconstruction. I went into the hospital with small breasts and was discharged with breasts, and that made the whole bc trauma a little easier to tolerate.
0 -
Ah, you gals are great! We're all in this together... no matter what our diagnosis was!
0 -
Anneb1149 - Good that you landed on a decision you were comfortable with. About your pre-surgery chemo, yes, neo-adjuvant chemo has been reported by quite a few posters here - not only does it shrink the tumor making it easier to excise, but it gives the docs an idea of what course of chemo works (or doesn't). Good point about how difficult it is to make important treatment decisions when our brain is paralyzed with the "I've got cancer" scream.
Wren44 - Sorry they found the larger, more aggressive tumor but SO glad they did. You said it was not on the mammogram and that lead me to wonder.............what other imaging did you have before your lumpectomy? Did you have ultrasound and/or MRI? Whatever you decide about any future surgery (for symmetry) you know you'll have support here.
MinusTwo - (hilarious name by the way!) Good on you not to mark time by chronological age! I am proud of my years but try not to let that number affect me in my life. So sorry about the recurrence and subsequent complications. You've had more than your share of BC treatments, for sure. Sounds like it hasn't kept you down, though. Thanks for being such an inspiration.
Seedsally - I'm surprised that your first surgeon said no to your BMX choice - especially if he felt it would be needed later - that's crazy! You're very lucky to have a supportive hubby with you during your BC experience. I lost my DH 15 years ago and have thought about how great it would have been to have him around during my surgery/rads, etc.
It seems odd to have atypical cells in lymph node on opposite side - how were they discovered? Doc exam? MRI? Please let us know.
CarolH - thanks for your reply. Sounds pretty straightforward to me!
Thanks to all for replying to my question. I think my age wasn't a huge factor in my treatment however when I read about younger women deciding to throw the kitchen sink at their BC's because of young children, etc. I completely understand. Not having young children and being widowed might have played a role, even if subconsciously, in my decision to do a more conservative treatment regime.
0 -
Sunny - before my initial surgery, I had a mammogram, an Ultrasound & ULS biopsy, a CT scan to pinpoint the tumors for the surgeon and a PET scan to make sure nothing had yet metastasized.
0 -
I was halfway through 64 when diagnosed--after years of normal annual mammograms, the words “focal asymmetry not present in 2013 & 2014” gobsmacked me. Turned out to be grade 2 stage IA 1.3cm IDC, ER+/PR+/HER2- (more strongly PR+ than ER+, so that probably raised my oncotype score out of the very low range). My BS gave me the choice of lx + rads, umx or bmx w/or w/o recon; she showed me a decision tree video and computer program that led to my decision to do just lx + rads, especially because my husband & I had booked the cruise of a lifetime for the week before Christmas and I wanted to be done with rads (and time chemo, if needed, to not be during the cruise dates) before setting sail. The cruise was wonderful--and my husband having recovered from two emergency intestinal surgeries was the motivating factor in taking it. I was focused on completing active treatment in plenty of time to take that cruise.
But in retrospect, I think I should have opted for bilateral reductions along with the lx. BMX seemed like overkill to me since the mammo on my other breast was still dead-bang normal, and even UMX would have been messy with or w/o recon. Plastic surgery would have extended recovery time long enough that we probably wouldn’t have been able to take the cruise even with short radiation because I would have been too exhausted. Whether I chose implants or DIEP (I have loads of belly fat & skin to work with), symmetry would have been tough to achieve. My breasts are huge, size H/I or even J (note to preteen girls: be careful what you wish for). There is no way i could do a UMX w/o recon unless I had the other one reduced--they just don’t make prostheses and mastectomy bras or camis that big. Though due to a tumor-cavity seroma and rads I had enough swelling that both breasts are now about the same size, I’m not sure what will happen if & when all the swelling disappears. (I’ll probably use a “shell” in my bras on the surgical side). And the size and weight of my breast turned out to have pulled open my SNB incision and caused the seroma to burst--delaying the start of rads by another two weeks. I cut it REALLY close. So my surgical decision was based partly on age--we’ve been married nearly 45 years and we’d both learned that health crises can mean that any more time than that is not a given.
The margins were clear, the nodes (2 sentinel, 2 non) all negative. My Oncotype DX score was 16--still technically in the “low” range but too high for me to be absolutely comfortable. My MO had said before the test that she was 90% sure that she wouldn’t recommend chemo, even before I told her about my concerns about cardiotoxicity (given my age), neuropathy and possible hearing damage (I’m a musician), and impaired immunity (I’m allergic to three major groups of antibiotic). When the score came back (and her e-mail to me read “Good news--your Oncotype is low--16, and you won’t need chemo”), she told me it was my choice but if it were her mother she would recommend against chemo--compared to just AI therapy chemo would have conferred only a 1% advantage in terms of recurrence risk and added less than a year and a half to my life expectancy--and who knows what the quality of that extra lifespan would be? If I were 20 or even 10 years younger, I think we would have both weighed the options a bit differently.
The other age-related pieces of the puzzle were radiation and hormone therapy. I had assumed that I would be getting the full 33-treatment whole-breast protocol, giving me less than a week or two to recover in time for the cruise. But my RO surprised me by telling me of a study in which he’d just finished participating, finding that in women over 60 with stage IA Luminal A tumors (like mine), 16 stronger treatments to just the tumor bed and a small margin around it was equally effective in reducing recurrence. He offered me the choice, and I jumped at it. Good thing I did: the seroma burst two days later, yet even so I was finished with rads three weeks before setting sail--before Thanksgiving, in fact. Had I opted for the full protocol, I wouldn’t have been able to take the cruise at all. The downside was I’m not sure whether the stronger radiation, even abbreviated without the SNB site in the field of treatment, might have caused the cording and stage 1 lymphedema I now have. I know for sure that it caused the enlargement of my mammary seroma, fibrosis of the tissue around my lx scar and swelling of my breast (which before all this had been half a cup size smaller than my left). I notice that my treated breast shows marks from bra seams that remain longer than on my left one--even though my LE doctor and therapist both say that’s not breast lymphedema, I’m not so sure. (Thank goodness it’s not truncal).
As to letrozole, age is a two-edged sword. On the good side, I’d been 10 years postmenopausal, so the drop in estrogen wasn’t as abrupt as in a newly or peri-menopausal woman (much less a premenopausal one thrown into pharmacological menopause by ovarian suppression, SERM or AI therapy); the side effects are fewer and milder thus far (4 months in), but beginning to intensify somewhat: trigger thumb, muscle aches, more night sweats. stronger carb cravings coupled with lowered metabolism and morning and “startup” joint pain. But all of that (except possibly the weight and appetite stuff) are also symptoms of ordinary menopause--and my natural menopause was quite “kind” to me in that regard. I worry, though, that the milder SE’s I’m experiencing might mean that the drug isn’t lowering my estrogen as much as it could, and recurrence always looms (as it always does with Luminal A bc if you live long enough past average age without succumbing to the usual elderly-woman causes of death)....but it could also mean time & tide took care of most of the estrogen before I began taking the drug--just more gradually. I also wonder if I had entered menopause 5 years earlier (statistically average), I’d have had SEs at all....or even developed bc.
In contrast, my close friend (who was motivated by my own experience to get her first mammogram in 25 years) was recently diagnosed at 70 (15 years widowed, 20 years postmenopausal) with ER-/PR- DCIS--large, centrally located in a small dense breast, multifocal grade 3; her other breast was discovered to have “anomalous calcifications." She reasoned that she hadn’t worn a bra in 30 years, had no interest in dating, a lumpectomy would have been so wide as to be almost a mastectomy, and that she didn’t want to go through the whole diagnostic roller coaster in the other breast down the road, a BMX made sense. Her surgeon tried to talk her into BLX with oncoplasty, or at least reconstruction, but she was adamant that she wanted to be “one and done” as far as breast surgery of any kind. (She has also had two stents and an arterial separation--so her reluctance to go under the knife for appearance’s sake is understandable). Her path report came back with pure DCIS in the left breast and “stellate radiating scarring” (perhaps from a long-ago surgical biopsy for a benign mass) containing ADH in the other, with the pathologist considering that ADH to have been precancerous. Her sentinel nodes were all negative. And her margins were clear. In her case, she made the right decision: all that’s left for her now is to heal.
0 -
I often wonder why women decide on their treatment plans- I was 67 when diagnosed with this cancer in my other breast ( BC 7 yrs agoDCIS) had many biopsies which should have given me some warning that something just wasn't right but lived the last few yrs trying not to think about it- mammos, US, MRI every 6 months and doctors visits as scheduled- dx in the fall with early BC stage1 grade 1 ILC- as I did years ago I decided on a lumpectomy and radiation this time taking Arimidex - my husband had medical issues 3 yrs ago and I wanted a treatment plan which would have the least down time (within reason) each of us hope that we've made the right decisio
0 -
Hi everyone. I have to say that my age was a factor in almost every decision I made after my diagnosis. I was 62 and was a grandmother for the first time to twin boys. I also have a debilitating autoimmune disease which affected my decisions. I think If I was in really good health I might have made a few different ones. Anyway I wasn't as concerned about how I looked naked, only in clothes. I wasn't as concerned about recurrence since I felt I had less time to recur than younger women. I chose to do direct to implant reconstruction because it was easier even if I had to have smaller breasts. I think I would have considered DIEP if I was younger. I have refused chemo and anti hormone treatment for QOL issues. Lastly I have no desire to do my nipples which I might have done if I was younger. So yes I think my age definitely affected my decisions! Good luck to all....
0 -
chisandy - some thoughts from your post:
Interesting that a cruise entered into your treatment decision - and very understandable. BC is life-changing enough without having to put off such important life events.
We had similar BC's - size, grade, stage, clear margins, no node involvement, normal contralateral breast - just different type (IDC vs ILC). ILC is the step-child of BC's in that it is usually lumped in with IDC treatment protocols...but that's another discussion for another thread.
Your very large breasts have certainly added to your treatment woes - more so than I ever considered. In 2009 I had a cosmetic breast reduction. (Not sure of the cup size pre-reduction, but big enough that surgeon took over 500cc's from each breast. That's a total of over TWO LBS of breast tissue!!) I understand why you say that if you had it to do over, you'd have opted for BR. But the upside is that there was plenty of tissue to remove for a successful LX, in your case.
As for age as a factor when considering chemo - I, too, thought about being in my 60's and chemo. If there had been a clear-cut benefit, I wouldn't have hesitated, but even with an OncoDX of 20, the benefit was small. Factor in tumor size, grade and the ILC (which is typically not as responsive to chemo as IDC) and I decided to stick with two MO's advice for no chemo. Of course, I'll always wonder if I did enough but must just let that go. I am happy that I haven't challenged my healthy tissue and am keeping my immune system strong (sleep, exercise, probiotics, vitamins, etc.)
I'm also on letrozole and, like you, have few side effects in the early weeks. You say your SE's started later........I'm hoping our experiences are different in that regard.
nanagirl - So sorry for the ILC after NED for so many years. Glad it was still early stage. You make a good point for how spouses and their health become part of so many women's treatment decisions. This BC stuff is bigger than just us, sometimes. It affects many of those close to us as well.
dtad - you're a good example of just how much our ages can influence treatment decisions. I am so grateful that we have so many options open to us when faced with BC, especially given how we personalize out treatment plans on so many things such as family, age, children/grandchildren, life plans, etc.
0 -
I think the purpose of life is to be useful, to be responsible, to be honorable, to be compassionate.It is, after all, to matter:to count, to stand for something, to have made some difference that you lived at all. -Leo Rosten
0 -
Sunnyone,
I don't post often, but wanted to chime in here. I was 2 months shy of my 67th b-day when diagnosed in Jan 14. It was a small Stage 1 IDC ,Triple Negative with no lympth node involvement. TN is very aggressive and has no dedicated treatment (other than chemo) unlike the hormone + bc's. If it recurs, it happens more often in the first 3 years after diagnosis. There was no question that I would do aggressive chemo for a total of 6 months, followed by 2 months of rads. I chose an LX over MX as I was told by all my docs that the chances of survival were the same - in fact - slightly better w/an LX. I am small breasted anyway and hardly notice the slight indent on the bc side. I didn't have to think twice about it and I have no regrets over any of my treatment. I was in excellent health before chemo which probably helped me tolerate it very well. I even managed to keep up my exercise (at a slower pace) every day through treatment. I have no lingering side effects from treatment and lead a very active lifestyle. I've had a few scares (2 of them recently), and am very grateful that they turned out to be nothing. I feel blessed beyond words to be healthy, active and to be here to enjoy my kids and 7 grandchildren. Best of luck to you in your treatment.
Paula
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwGvfdtI2c0