TRIPLE POSITIVE GROUP
Comments
-
I am one year out from completion of chemo and we can all agree that it is a journey through hell. I also had a UMX, no reconstruction, plus 28 sessions of radiation. Thirteen years ago I had DCIS, stage 0 with one per cent chance of recurrence after undergoing a lumpectomy plus radiation. Imagine my shock to have a much more serious form of cancer and a large tumor under my arm. I take letrozole and function well on it. I also do not obsess about the what-ifs down the road. I refuse to be covered in ANTS, automatic negative thinking.
I am amazed at well I feel now and how healthy that I appear to be. My MO tells me that I have an 80 percent change of non-recurrence which are wonderful odds.
I have discomfort from my surgical site whenever I lie down to sleep, but it is manageable. My MO told me today that it is simply nerve and muscle damage. I suppose every day will bring reminders of this disease. Still, I am happy that I did the treatments and I am grateful to be alive.
0 -
I teach at a school where the students are from all over the world. It is their first year in America and they are learning English. Since my dx I've been wearing a breast cancer bracelet and most recognize it and know what's happening to me. They have all been very kind and supportive, but just like adults, they do say things you would rather not hear. I cannot count how many kids have come up to me to say "my grandmother or aunt had bc but she died." I try to keep in mind these kids come from poor countries with limited medical care. Finally, last week, a boy handed me a homemade card, saying my grandmother had that, she's ok now. Despite their limited English, the students have found ways to show they care. I get random hugs and cards and one sweet girl looks for me everyday to say "you be alright, miss". When I started wearing scarves they told me not to worry about my hair, just get better. Great kids. I miss them this week while chemo has me out of commission.
0 -
debiann, children are the greatest. I know. I used to be a fifth grade teacher many years ago. Consider them angels that you need in your life right now.
0 -
vette - I think it is important to remember that chemo is not used for the purpose of eradicating the tumor in the breast - that is what surgery is for. Systemic treatment, chemo/targeted/hormonals, are meant to eradicate random cells and keep them from setting up shop outside the breast. Pathological response measured after neoadjuvent chemo is a gauging tool, but may not necessarily be indicative of what is going elsewhere in your body. On an individual basis, I don't think any doctor can tell you that either, and, yes, you are correct that those of us who do chemo and other systemic therapy adjuvently will never know if it worked, or by what percentage.
0 -
When I was first diagnosed as her2-my BS said to me-"this changes everything, we now have to treat this as a whole body disease...you are going straight to chemo". I think that is what you are saying too-SpecialK-that chemo is more for those stray cells, and to shrink tumors, but possibly not remove them. MY BS also told me that my non her2 breast may not respond as well to chemo as the her2 breast-and she was right....that tumor shrank less than any.
0 -
so I went to see my MO today and we had a LONG discussion about hormone therapy - here are the goods:
at the ASCO in Chicago the results of the "don't know the name" study (sorry cant remember) compared
pre-meno women on tamox plus ova suppression AND pre-meno women on an AI plus ova suppression - results were that the women on ova suppression plus an AI did better - statistically enough for her to change me to Femara
now the results of SOFT and TEXT wont be out until the end of the year but she said one can "guess" that tamox alone wont do as well but she cannot say for sure. Plus if you are really young the implications of shutting down your estrogen might be worse then the risk of recurrence. I think if you are high risk then that should be weighed in to the decision for sure
I asked about her2 and if we are safe after 5yrs if we are hormone positive. She said that there are no long term studies to follow women in this boat but in her opinion she feels that yes, we are as much at risk as the hormone pos her2 neg ladies. She said the her2 part is what puts you at early recurrence risk but that the er risk continues past 5 years which is not what I wanted to hear!
so im stopping tamox and starting femara, continuing w the shots and if the SOFT trial has similar results the ovaries are coming out
0 -
lago - my MO also said she prefers femara to arimidex -didn't ask why, I was so tired of all the medical speak at that point!
0 -
I have heard from a friend that is on Femara that it seems to be more effective in women over 60 (past menopause for several years. Don't remember the exact number). In my case I wasn't even 50 when I started this and chemo put me in menopause. But my onc also put my neighbor on Anastrozole and she is over 60. So who knows.
0 -
I was 57 when Dxd. I was 3 years past menopause. I got anastrozole. (Arimidex)
0 -
I will be taking Femara and I am 56. Guess the Dr thought I was close enough to 60. LOL
0 -
So many posts I can't keep up... And my cat did not puke today!
So I decided to just post this to all of you going through chemo. My final chemo was 2/26/13 and final Herceptin was 12/9/13. So today, 6/5/14, I can tell you I feel like a million bucks. I had to run all over our campus for meetings and I just couldn't believe how much I felt like my pre-diagnosis self! I have strong legs again, I can stand up from a chair without using my arms to help. My feet tingle and burn here and there, but I can keep that from happening by wearing good shoes, taking my B vitamins, drinking lots of water, being patient and getting enough sleep. I have hair and nails and I can breathe without feeling wheezy or short of breath. I'm flexible again (as much as I ever was, which wasn't much) can sit with my right leg tucked under my left butt cheek, which I've done all my life except the past year and a half when I just couldn't bend my knee that much.
I feel happy and hopeful. Food tastes good and I sleep well. I still sleep too much when I get the chance, but heck, I've always been like that. My skin on my left boob looks normal after 35 cycles of radiation (I had one very tan, brown boob last summer which sat next to a big pale white one). I'm no longer crippled from the AI and besides a few recent hot flashes and some mild anxiety here and there, I don't even know I'm on it. Hopefully my bones don't either.
And yes, chemo came close to killing me. There's something in that sweet little mix of taxotere and carboplatin that knocked me on my butt and put me in the hospital bubble ward for 5 days. I wasn't even allowed to have flowers in my room or wander down to the gift shop. I never told anyone but my nurses this, but I had tarry black stools during my stay, which is a sign of bleeding in the upper GI tract and can be very serious. I think it was a tear somewhere from all my vomiting. I needed at least 2 units of packed red blood cells during taxol, but my NP could only get reimbursement for 1. At a hemoglobin of 6 I wasn't low enough for 2 (huh?). I was gasping for air just walking through the parking lot at Meijer. I couldn't stop pooping, couldn't control when it would come on and had to wear diapers during dog walks and work days. My washing machine and rug scrubber got quite a work out. (I actually killed the washing machine, it had had enough). I had hemorrhoids that made me cry. I couldn't sit in meetings, had to get up and pace on my wussy legs. I went from a left ventricular ejection fraction of >70 to <55%. I was one sick, tired, old, haggard, bald, sore, toe-nailess puppy.
So keep going! It really is a blip and then slowly (way too slowly for my taste) it all starts to come back. Many, many prayers and much understanding from Pbrain!
0 -
hi all. Interesting conversations! My MO who is the chief of oncology at the hospital where I am being treated told me that I have a 15% chance of reoccurrence but that he feels that with my cancer and my current health, that I will live a long life. Whatever that means. Lol
Today hubby and I rode bikes for 18 miles I just can't get over how this is possible when I am receiving chemo for breast cancer! I also walk and do weights. Everything that I did before
I am hoping that as I move forward with this that I forget about the possibility of dying young. Mom is 91 and dad was 87 when he passed away. Sis is 65 this year. Time will tell!
Funny. 2 of 21 lymph nodes were had cancer but there's been no mention of radiation for me. I wonder why when it seems that many women with impacted nodes get rads
I'll chat with my mo next tues
0 -
football - because you had all those nodes removed, if you had not done the ALND then rads would have been recommended. I know there are those that do both, but I think that number is diminishing and now it seems to be an either/or situation.
0 -
I had intrabeam at the time of my surgery where the tumor was located. But the radiologist still wants me to do five weeks of radiation after chemo. I really tried to talk her out of it, but she said I needed to treat the whole breast.
0 -
Pbrain, is your ejection fraction going back up? How bad is radiation? I'm having a hard time committing to it, thinking of umx instead, but then wonder if I'll regret that down the road. My current train of thought is that the purpose of chemo is to save my life, I have to do that. But the purpose of rads is to save my left boob, so by removing it I could avoid exposing myself to more se's. I'm sooooo tired of decisions.
0 -
Getting a UMX is not a guarantee of no rads. I am currently getting rads x30 after UMX. LVI and 9 nodes all with extranodal extension put me in the need rads category. There are many factors that go into each person's treatment plan.
0 -
My bs said I don't need rads if I do umx. I already had lump with no node involvement, but the margins were close so she wants to clean things up. I don't think she's planning on taking anymore nodes. Of course I'm getting used to all these wonderful surprises, so I guess someone could think I still need rads.
0 -
That is good that you would not need rads with UMX. They are not just for saving your boob though. They are to go after any possible remaining cancer cells in the area. They do this in a different way than chemo. If I remember correctly, it destroys part of the cells DNA, keeping it from reproducing. Radiation info link
0 -
Amazing thread- amazing amount of info!
Debiann- A UMX will give you side effects, lasting ones, especially if you choose reconstruction.My chest/arm area will never feel the same. My range of motion is getting better through yoga but still a little limited. (w/0 recon probably easier). However, I didn't have the choice of a lumpectomy because of multifocal- also had a spot of DCIS.
I had rads --supraclavicular, chest wall, scar, drain site - not full armpit as I had had ALND and they didn't find anything additional). My rads was due to nodes, LVI. , Because I had UMX they used the bolus on me every day in order to try to give my upper tissue an intense burn (which I fought with my calendula cream). Anyway, the last week I finally got a pretty ugly burn. Now a year out, my radiated skin looks like all my other skin and it's not sensitive like it once was. Rads was hard for me psychologically I think because I had put all my energy into getting through chemo in as positive a way possible and I was just not up for "waiting for the burn" of rads. But physically, rads and the recovery from it was not all that bad.
Rozem, I don't see my MO till July. I'm 49 (dx at 47) and haven't had a period in a year and half and estriol levels are extremely low- below 5%. She had me start with tamox because she was afraid my period would come back. She didn't think there was a need to take the Lupron shots and take AI. I'm wondering now what she will think. Does this mean tamoxifen is a bad choice? Should I be worried as these are my vulnerable years - I'm just a few months out of finishing Herceptin- 1.75 years from dx?
Footballnut- you are rocking chemo! Keep up the great spirits! I know there are down days but isn't it awesome what you can do!
Lago, I actually find the idea of bc as chronic as oddly comforting-- I think of a chronic disease as one that you can LIVE with, like lupus or MS, or heart disease or diabetes. I like to think it's a condition that I hate but that I can manage.I also think that in the future they will be able to do tumor analysis that will more accurately predict recurrence- so perhaps they really will know when some people are cured.
PBrain- you went through the wringer. So inspiring how you didn't give up and that you've recovered so well.
I also wanted to mention I have three old friends who were triple positive. They all were premenopausal. Two got Herceptin right when it came out. One is eleven years out (1b), one is ten years out (3A- BRAC+)), and one is six years out (2A). And they are all doing great.
0 -
momwriter - of course not, tamox is a great choice. Remember that there is a statistical difference but the majority still do great on tamox - ive been on for 2.5 years already so I hope so! I worry big time about the estrogen depletion though because add the H and E (in fec) and that's a lot on your heart. Im still confused. I want to do everything possible to hit this thing hard but I don't want to die of heart failure due to rx -
0 -
Thanks momwriter for telling me about the se's of umx. If I go this route I'm not doing recon, at least not right away. When I was discussing options with the ps he asked me what my goal was. I said I want to do the thing that's the easiest with the least se. now if I could just figure out what that is.
0 -
Reconstruction can be a long, drawn-out process. I'm not sure what I would have decided if I would have had a crystal ball.
Regarding chemo, in a lot of ways it reminds me of pregnancy and maybe vice versa. Years ago, when I was pregnant for the first and only time, I described how I felt (early in the pregnancy) to a friend of mine. Fortunately, I never had morning sickness but nonetheless, I felt crappy and tired. After one particularly crappy weekend I told her I was convinced I had cancer versus pregnancy. Flash forward 25 or so years and I felt like I was pregnant versus going through chemo. It also reminds me of pregnancy in that time takes the edge off of the experience, at least it has for me.
I was able to breathe a sigh of relief today. I got the results of my comprehensive metabolic panel from last Wednesday and every single category was in the normal range, including liver enzymes! Every single liver enzyme was elevated about a month ago but I had just had surgery the week before. It's a roller-coaster.
0 -
I too am doing rads on both breasts-including my masectomy left breast. My BS also originally told me I would not have to have rads if I had a masectomy. However, that changed as I was multi tumored in that breast and now they are saying one of the six tumors was also close to my chest wall. So a masectomy does not always guarantee no rads. And my BS was actually trying to use no rads as incenitive to have a double masectomy...so I am glad I did not listen to her with that just in mind. I would have been pretty upset.
0 -
Regarding rads:
Not all of us need it but if the choice is yours and you are having a difficult time with it, this article may help with your decision. It is a few years out but as far as I know still definitive and supported by more recent study.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/20/health/research/20cancer.html?_r=0
0 -
momwriter I was 49 at diagnosis/perimenopausal. Last cycle 2 weeks before chemo. My onc felt I was so close to menopause (also bases on my mom and sister) that it would not come back. She started me with Anastrozole and tested my estiol levels for 5 months to be sure (while I started Anastrozole). My on never liked Tamoxifen and now with the latest info from last weekends oncology meeting it is supported that the AIs are more effective and luprin/AI might be an option in some cases for premenopausal women. But my onc definitely has a bias against Tamoxifen which IMO might be a bit unfair. At one time there were no AIs. All women got Tamoxifen and did very well on it. That's why they still use it today. It's a good medication and lots of women are on it with great outcomes
Debiann I ended up doing the BMX because they found a small amount of LCIS in the other breast so it was recommended. Do I feel different, well yes but I don't really remember what I felt before because this seems normal to me. My main issues are from the lymph node surgery. My range is not the same but not bad and a little stiff when I raise my arms high. As far as the implants, well my PS doesn't want me to do exercises the focus on only on the pecs but that's about it. Also remember you will lose sensation in that area. I have some skin sensation but there is a dead spot but it doesn't bother me. I'm glad I did it. Reduces my chance of a new breast cancer to 1%. I had very dense tissue. Also if I kept the other breast and just removed the LCIS I do believe I would have had to do rads. I got a pass on rads even though I was in a grey area. So far I'm fine.
0 -
Thanks Lago and Rozem, You all are very helpful and informative. I won't panic right now about tamox and I'll have lots of info when I meet with my onc in July.
LeeA- I agree- I'm not sure I would have done reconstruction had I known how it would feel. Are you recovered from your implant surgery yet? I've delayed mine till after the summer. I also felt chemo was a little like pregnancy- in fact, I felt that I had an equally low chance of being pregnant as I had of getting BC- sometimes I still think- wow, I'd have a year old baby if it had worked out that way- how would that have changed things? (I have a 10 and 12 year old).
Lago, did they find the LCIS before your BMX or after? I have dense tissue as well- the MRI was clear last year. But I was told I can't have another breast MRI till I get my TE out. That is one huge benefit of a BMX- don't have to worry about regional recurrence as much. Also, sometimes I don't know if my ROM issues in my shoulder are ALND or Recon related.
0 -
as far as recon goes. Not everyone has problems and takes the scenic route. But we don't know that until we go through it. I had BMX with TE's, fills then permanent saline implants back in 2000. The first couple weeks were rough with pain, but after that it was not so bad. I never had any healing issues or infections. After the permanent implants and the tattoes I never saw a PS for almost 9 years when I decided to exchange for silicone gummies. Yes, you have a loss of sensation, and they will never look or fell like real ones, and it did take a while to get my range of motion and strength back, but I never regretted my decision. In my naïveté ,and because I was never told otherwise, I did all kinds of excercises and jobs I probably should not have. It's a wonder I didn't get LE along the way!
0 -
momwriter I had an MRI before surgery (BS always does this) that showed 4 suspicious spots in the "good" breast. One that my BS was really concerned about (and I think he knew it was LCIS). Since there were so many delays (initial mammo was 2.5 months before my surgery date) that he didn't want to delay surgery any longer so he could do a biopsy. That's why I also had a SNB on that side too. If they knew it was LCIS I don't think they would have done that.
But even with a BMX you can get a new cancer in your breast. Happened to a friend of mine and a couple of others on this site. I think it's about a 1-2% chance but the BMX greatly reduces your chances.
0 -
BTW...
ICYMI from ASCO Vitamin D is not tied to breast cancer outcomes. We've discussed this many times here.
0 -
a kind of flawed study in that they only tested the D levels once. It would have helped to test the D level on the recurrences or mortality subjects. Bit D is probably not a cure. Still anecdotally on the boards, Vitamin D was very low on most.
0