Best Of
Re: Can we have a forum for "older" people with bc?
This must be the day for mistakes…I put too much down the disposal last night and, yep you guessed it, the sink stopped up and overflowed underneath—my fault. My DH was still at the gym so I had to unstop, empty, and clean underneath the sink by myself. I got it done and it runs smoothly now—I hope. I am exhausted since I had to bend and get down on my knees. I had plans to do other things today but I can usually only do one big activity a day. When my DH got home, before I had it all finished and sanitized, he put the air sanitizer nearby for the smell. He has bad knees so I knew he wouldn't do it. Oh well, at least that helped.
Re: Mucinous Carcinoma of the breast
Hey sisters! I'm back and so is my breast cancer after 15 years. Yep! A "morphologically comparable" 6mm tumor to the 1.6 cm tumor that I had 15 years ago. So here is the short version. Reviewing the tumor from 2010, it turns out that I didn't have pure mucinous BC. Instead, according to MSK, it was pure mucinous BC with micropapillary features. And that Grade 1? It was a Grade 2. Interestingly, I had the 2010 slides also reviewed by a third pathologist who concurred with MSK after they looked at it a SECOND time. Oh, well. And the new tumor? Well, it is no longer classified as pure mucinous with micropapillary features. It is now, IDC with mucinous features.
So, what does this all mean? Well, it could take days for me to bring all of you sisters up to speed. The only thing I can say is that according to the wonderful MSK pathologist, whom I have known since my journey began, has told me that there are too many gaps at this time to say with any certainty whether or not this recurrence is more or less aggressive than the original tumor. Both of us looked up what little literature there was and it appears there is lacking consensus even on how much micropapillary features a tumor must have before it is even classified as pure mucinous with micropapillary features! She and her MSK colleagues have even written a paper on pure mucinous with micropapillary features. Having a recurrence without those features? No data reported. Furthermore, when micropapillary features are present, there is a higher incidence of LVI and positive lymph nodes. In my case, both negative. The only more aggressive feature in the recurrence is that it is now PR negative. But, it also went from 90% ER positive to 100% ER positive. Go figure. Both tumors were described as well circumscribed and glistening. So, on gross examination they are comparable and retain somewhat of the favorable mucinous characteristics.
With all of that said, my two medical oncologists are cautiously optimistic. One said, don't rack your brains out looking for treatment and prognosis because you won't find any data. But, he also said that I still had one of the better cancers. Second medical oncologist said not to worry about the PR negative because the 6mm makes it unlikely to go rogue. Okay. Last time, I did 8 years of endocrine therapy and three years of ovarian suppression because at age 53 I was premenopausal. Also did 6 Zometa infusions. Quit endocrine therapy at 8 years because the BCI index score came back low risk and I wouldn't benefit from further therapy. Discussed the ESR1 mutation. Very unlikely because recurrence occurred 7 years following discontinuing endocrine therapy. First tumor, Oncotype DX score 15. Low risk and chemo would have been more harmful than beneficial.
So, had double mastectomy with implants and now embarking on many more years of endocrine therapy depending on what the future data says and the future holds….
I delayed sharing this news for 6 months while I gathered as much details as I could provide.. I wanted to first get from my pathologists and medical oncologists as much info as possible so I could pass it along to all of you. I wish my team could have given me more solid evidence to help me make as best of an informed decision as possible. Unfortunately, this case, which happens to be my case, is an outlier in the annals of mucinous breast cancer. So, if you have any questions, you might want to ask AI first for some answers. Believe me, AI helped me a great deal, but only up to a point. So be my guest…feel free to find answers to your questions from AI because if you ask ME any questions, I would probably refer you to AI….
Oh… last point…My first tumor was misdiagnosed as a benign cyst for THREE years before a second radiologist pinpointed it and said he was going to biopsy that sucker. He has been on my team for the last 15 years and was a PIT BULL. I am so grateful to him and he has promised me he isn't retiring anytime soon and will continue doing annual sonograms especially since both tumors were deep inside at the 5 o'clock position. Never palpable.
I feel so blessed. Here I am now. My kids grown. Grandkids. I will repeat what I have said from the beginning of my journey, for many of us breast cancer is a treatable disease. When I began my journey HER2 positive treatments were just evolving. Today, with all the treatments available, mortality rates have improved to the point that they are coming close to those with ER positive disease. My wish has always been that we find better treatments and a dare I say a CURE especially for those younger patients who are more often than not diagnosed with more aggressive tumors.
I wish all of our sisters, young and old long lives! And for those who have passed, whose journeys coincided with mine, I continue to think of them and how they have affected my life and I will remain grateful for having known them as well.
Carpe Diem!
