Best Of
Re: Mucinous Carcinoma of the breast
sonia…so there is no confusion….in the body of my post, I explain my primary was 90% ER positive and the recurrence is 100% ER positive. The primary was 50% PR positive. Recurrence, PR negative.
i also had PT for cording following my lumpectomy. I also had a procedure that released my frozen shoulder caused by another, unrelated issue.
Moving forward, I will not be addressing anything else regarding mucinous breast cancer. The reason being, is, as I mentioned before, there are so many gaps with respect to understanding its treatment. As Obsolete suggests, Mucinous should be looked at, as, on a spectrum. And then, there is data. Dealing with a rare subtype, often times, the only way to understand treatments is through meta analysis because there are too few diagnoses to establish statistical significance through randomized studies.
i have discussed at length with my team, my concern regarding the PR negativity, the micropapillary features, and the change from pure mucinous to IDC with Mucinous features. Have I read about the potential negative consequences of being PR negative? Of course. That said, most of the data specifically addresses the traditional types of breast cancer. There is, here and there, very small studies regarding PR negativity and Mucinous breast cancers. Most data is not statistically significant. Recently, I zeroed in on Korean study of mucinous breast cancer recurrences. If I remember correctly, I was scratching my head because two of the four were Luminal A. While the other two, were Luminal B. Again, the data is so sparse, it would be difficult to draw any conclusions….
i will repeat what I have said from the beginning of my journey, for many of us, breast cancer is a very treatable disease. Yesterday, I met with my local medical oncologist. She said, “You had a very small tumor. You had surgery to remove it. You will do well, just like before.”
Hope springs eternal.
carpe diem.
