I say YES. YOU say NO....Numero Tre! Enjoy!
Comments
-
Well that lays it out to a tee.
1 -
Well if it isn't the orange loon grifter with no bottom.
1 -
Some people have totally wiped the word shame out of their vocabulary. I think disgrace is likely missing as well and that is what you and that asshat partner of yours really are. It would seem you're a matched pair deserving of each other so no one decent is ruined.
1 -
2 -
How interesting you are NOT.
2 -
What I often think about is how easy it was to dupe people into believing just from a tv program (it was most certainly not reality tv either) that Trump had some sort of brilliance as a businessperson. I think of that saying if you can't dazzle them with your brilliance beat em' with your bullshit. And here is at least 25 to 30% convinced that Trump is the real thing when all he was is a made up tv personality — with the only thing going for him, a producer who knew how to get results from a total loser.
Worse yet he was given a second chance by people who really should have known better.
2 -
I definitely hope they tell him to shove it up his grifting heart.
1 -
This has no other reason than the full throated and total stupidity of two people who have about as much sight as moles underground. It is stupidity on an order that is almost un-believable for anyone.
1 -
Just a thought here guys — just a thought.
0 -
2 -
Elon's not going to like this one.
3 -
Don't tell Musk. He seems to like to pry into many things that don't concern him.
2 -
True, but there are some people in government especially that haven't received that memo yet.
2 -
2 -
So there we are — where we were not supposed to be — but it's the grifters in charge getting away with whatever they like.
2 -
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to allow mass firings of probationary workers
The appeal is part of a nascent effort by the Trump administration to press the Supreme Court to rein in district court judges.
By Kyle Cheney
03/24/2025 12:50 PM EDT
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Monday to allow it to follow through with its attempt to fire thousands of probationary workers across the federal government.
The administration filed an emergency appeal of a March 13 ruling from U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who ordered the government to immediately rehire probationary workers who had been terminated at six federal agencies.
Alsup’s order required the government to offer reinstatements to about 16,000 federal workers, Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris wrote in the appeal.
Alsup’s ruling let “third parties hijack the employment relationship between the federal government and its workforce,” Harris argued.
“That is no way to run a government,” she wrote.
Alsup, a San Francisco-based appointee of President Bill Clinton, ruled that the administration had violated federal law and skirted required procedures when it conducted the mass terminations. A second judge — Baltimore-based U.S. District Judge James Bredar, an appointee of President Barack Obama — similarly found that the terminations of probationary workers was illegal, and he issued an even more sweeping order requiring the workers to be rehired at 18 federal agencies.
The emergency appeal of Alsup’s ruling is part of a nascent effort by the Trump administration to press the Supreme Court to rein in district court judges who have barred dozens of early actions by federal agencies seeking to implement a wave of executive orders by President Donald Trump. Harris described Alsup’s ruling as part of a series of rulings in which district court judges had overstepped their authority.
“This Court should stop the ongoing assault on the constitutional structure before further damage is wrought,” Harris wrote.
Harris submitted the appeal to Justice Elena Kagan, who handles emergency matters originating from California. Kagan is likely to refer the appeal to the full court.
1 -
We are so screwed…….
The Other 98% In a dangerously comical breach of national security, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth inadvertently shared classified war plans with The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, via a Signal group chat just hours before U.S. forces launched airstrikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen. This incident occurred when Goldberg was mistakenly added to the chat by Michael Waltz, Trump's national security adviser, revealing sensitive details about targets, weaponry, and the timing of the strikes. What else did we expect from DUI hire Pete Hegseth who is barely even qualified to host a show on Fox News let less run our entire military?
Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, initially thought the classified war plans shared with him via a group chat were a prank. Who wouldn’t? The detailed information about imminent airstrikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen seemed too specific and sensitive to be real. However, his skepticism turned to shock when the strikes began exactly as described in the messages, with bombs dropping at the precise time and location mentioned. This stark realization left Goldberg grappling with the implications of having received such sensitive information and the potential consequences of its leak.
The incident has sparked bipartisan criticism and raised questions about the Trump administration's handling of classified information. Which is especially ironic given how much hoopla trump made over Hillary Clinton’s private email server. The use of Signal, an unapproved platform for classified discussions, further exacerbates the issue, as it could expose vulnerabilities to adversaries like China, Iran, and Russia. Former officials have emphasized the severity of this breach, suggesting that if lower-ranking employees had committed a similar mistake, they would face severe repercussions, including potential loss of security clearances.2 -
We know there were all kinds of leaks during Trump's first four years — along with his stolen documents that he would not give back and this time around he seems far worse. Ruth, I think you might be right for sure. Trump wants loyalty to him and damn the rest of it. I think Walz should feel some concern but there again if anything were to take place it would be have to be from massive and nearly un-ending reports on this.
Trump ran on keeping people safe but he could care less in truth. This whole time out has been nothing but one disaster after the other. It is getting hard to see why anyone — no matter which side is willing to keep trying to go forward when we are in this rugged terrain and can count on nothing but trouble and disaster from the current group in charge. It's quite a mishmash in charge of people who have no idea what they are doing and putting us and millions of others in dire circumstances. Everything they do is destructive and hurting people and at some point — who knows. We are a ticking time bomb just waiting for this batch of losers to do some really irreparable harm.
1 -
I received the following from a friend. I don't know whether it's accurate information or not, but I think it's smart to make copies of your information, and encourage your friends to do the same.
"Those who work in high positions within the Social Security Department are sounding the alarm. Elon Musk & Trump are about to cause the Social Security Department to collapse. The most important advice that they offered is to: Go into your Social Security account & download a hard copy of your LIFETIME WORK RECORD!!!!It is really easy to do. Here is the information:
Go to: the ssa.gov website.At the top of the page you want the category: CARD & RECORD
Go down to PERSONAL RECORD
Print out your EARNINGS RECORD and keep them for your records.
If you have never been to the website before you will need to create an account. Also, if it has been a long time since you have logged onto your account, you may need to create a new account. They have changed the sign-in procedure recently for greater security. I had to create a new account and that didn't take long. Once I got into my account, the rest was easy.
This may seem extreme but if Musk deletes all of the social security records in his purge and you don't have a copy of your own information, they can easily say that you don't have a work record and deny you any social security payments. If you have a copy of your own records denying you will be much more difficult. If we don't need it, no foul. If we do need it, it is better to have access to it on our computer
Please share it with all of the individuals that are almost eligible or are currently eligible for benefits.
I also recommend that everyone who has paid into the Social Security system download their information, especially if they’ve accumulated the 40-week/credits minimum for benefits."
3 -
Ruth - SCARY. Thanks for the info.
1 -
Thanks for this, ruth. Who knows what they will do.
2 -
1 -
0 -
0 -
1 -
I can't even stand it!!!!!!!
3 -
The Not Ready for Prime Time Players
3 -
Absolutely because the corn dog wouldn't look as though it was as high as a kite just for openers.
2 -
Betrayal, I didn't make any emoji's because your cartoons were so ON all the way.
1 -
Well if he did, three words would suffice: No f-ing Thanks —- not needed and wanted way less.
2
